Beautiful. For decades I've been angry and fighting against the meta-analysis, and now there is a cogent well-written piece I can point to that is not my own writing that I've been sending to anybody willing to read it (Included, in case you are interested): https://tinyurl.com/4pvc36m3
What is your opinion on the adjuvant free rabies vaccine? As soon as we started down the vax are bad news train for our humans we stopped all but rabies for our animals and save a few occasions, do thr adjuvant free rabies vax. Interesting study on adjuvants and autoimmune issues in humans--Acronym ASIA ( Autoimmune syndrome Induced by Adjuvants) It explains exactly what happens to me or anyone in my immediate family who gets vaccinated with anything. Yehuda Shoenfeld is the primary researcher.
Rabies is the only vaccine for dogs and cats required by law. There is a livensed 3 year vaccine that is thimerosal-free but you have to ask for it. It is the only one I ise. There was a crowd-funded Rabies Challenge test done by Ronald Schiltz Nd Jean Dodds, both incredible veterinary immunologists. He was my professor and I credit him for teaching me enough that I refused the recent mRNA injection. The study took a grouo of Beagles, vaccinated them for rabies and then challenfed them with the actual virus. No dogs came down with rabies 5 years after vaccination. The results are online.
Thanks. I didn't clarify previously but I was more curious about the SAFETY of the adjuvant free vs traditional than its efficacy per se.
Given that immunity from one dose seems to provide good immunity for longer than a year or three (depending on chosen vax) do you still boost? For our pets we delay as long as possible.
Our Maltese had a bad reaction to his first rabies vax. Couldn't stop itching and trembling. Was traditional vax not pure vax He hasn't has had one since. He's prob going to college with my daughter tho as an ESA so will need to be current. I'm worried about it. New vet uses pure vax on cats I know but he hasn't seen this vet yet so not sure about dogs. I feel near certain it was prob adjuvant related but I'm no doc so idk. Hoping the pure vax really is safer. Thoughts?
Great read as always. Anecdotally I recall the frustration I started feeling in early 2021 trying to understand the “science” behind the EUA for the Pfizer jab, the safe and effective study from the NEJM etc, and communicating the lack of efficacy and honesty to anyone who would listen. What I didn’t realise at the time to my detriment was that it was pointless focusing on statements like “there are no known real world correlates of protection” in these documents, because people simply don’t ascribe corruption to these entities ... of course vaccines are 95% safe and effective! The reality is as you write, the entire edifice is a “tissue of whoppers” to quote Blackadder, an enormous racket at the heart of which is an endless supply of customers for the medical-pharma complex.
Among the other things to worry about, because pharmaceutical companies are publicly traded stock companies, we have created the situation where people don't have to wait for the companies to bribe them. They can bribe themselves. You buy stock in the company, you push their products, the stock price rises and you collect your reward. It used to be the case where we didn't have to worry about this very much because few people were capable of causing much of a change in stock prices. You watch the most senior government regulators, and maybe a few influential scientists, and just not care about what the rest does because it would hardly matter. Covid was different. If you could convince governments to spend millions on the shots, then of course the price of the stock would go up. Everybody could get in on this action.
I did read a piece by Mathew Crawford on RCT's and also a little on Brian Hooker as well as by Sharryl Atkisson and Jim West on Autism.
I was also quite shocked that it seems according to Jim West that Wakefield did not consider toxicology in his Autism study and did not include any conflicts of interest and there were no controls. I see in your Thesis you discussed the Wakefield issue sure you are aware of it but here is the reference:
Jim west also argues that vaccines are not subject to toxicology testing. I see you do too in your dissertation you discuss it in detail. It is clear that this is ignored everywhere in the Vaccine issue That there is where the bullet must be targeted. For that would hit the main pillar of the fraudsters. I see huge mafia sandbags there though.
Thanks for this eye opener. I agree the financial temptations and investments in vaccines are massive, in fact astronomical and that is why anyone questioning the VIC is smeared and targeted for destruction. There are clear merits that this industry in conflicted from so many angles, one wonders why the authorities don't want to investigate it. Looks like regulatory capture. Skin in the game and GPPP's?
The whole vaccine coverup seems to have the type of momentum the tobacco industry exerted against any voiced dangers of smoking. They eventually lost, and pharma will too, but pharma won't go down without a fight, and they have the funds to drag it out, by paying for fake fact checkers, holding universities to ransom, manipulating the leaders to censor the truth etc.....They won't be able to quash long term the growing awareness of harms from shots, despite the propaganda. That momentum will become adequate leverage to break their stranglehold. We are not nearly there yet though.
Exactly the questions I asked the gal on the phone which she had no answer for. When she couldn't answer my questions, I asked her for the name of the person in charge of all the clinical research studies at UCSD and she gave me two names and their phone numbers - Anthony Magit, M.D. Director UCSD Human Research Protections Program and a person named Rodney who was in charge of the CITI program at UCSD. CITI stands for Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative, a program “dedicated to serving the training needs of colleges and universities, healthcare institutions, technology and research organizations, and governmental agencies, as they foster integrity and professional advancement of their learners.”
I called Anthony Magit and told him I discovered I was enrolled in a clinical research study that I never enrolled in and gave him my clinical research study ID number that I got straight from the IRB department at UCSD. I asked him for the name of the clinical research study and asked him how I became enrolled in a clinical research study that I never signed up for. He said he would look into it and call me back. After a couple of days I called him back and he told me that if I didn’t know the name of the clinical research study I was enrolled in then he couldn’t tell me. I asked how that could be – I gave him my clinical research study ID number along with all my personal information and since he was in charge of all the clinical research studies how could he not know the name of the study I was enrolled in and how I became enrolled in it. His answer was the same, “If you didn’t know the name of the clinical research study you’re enrolled in than I can’t tell you.” He was more interested in knowing how I found out I was enrolled in a clinical research study.
I called Rodney the head of the CITI program at UCSD and he told me the same thing – If I didn’t know the name of the clinical research study I was enrolled in than he couldn’t tell me.
And that is when my whole world view sank to the bottom of the ocean floor.
Yeah, it is wild and horrifying. So, I made an appointment with psychiatrist because I thought maybe psychiatrist would have shred of empathy and point me in a direction I could go to that would get me off this clinical research study that I never enrolled in. I've never seen or talked to a psychiatrist or a psychologist in my entire life. That was that a bad idea and from personal experience I wouldn't recommend going to a psychiatrist or a psychologist in this day and age.
He said he thought I was paranoid. I said, "why do you think I'm paranoid?" He said, "because I don't have any paperwork to show him." I just stood up and thanked him for his time and politely left.
I can see why it took you eight years to articulate this issue. Not only is it complicated, but the forces arrayed to suppress your description are vast. I, as I suspect most people, felt no compulsion to question the "safe and effective" narrative for most of my life. My grandfather was Doctor in General Practice who sang the praises of the polio vaccine and personally administered my smallpox vaccine. The global warming scam should have been enough to tip me over the edge, as I never have believed that heap of propaganda dedicated to manipulating our every action. COVID's only contribution to the world is that it, and the idiotic reaction to it, caused the scales to fall from the eyes of so many. Thanks. Great article, however sad.
GOD bless you TR for being a true medical TRUTH Warrior. We knew of the dangers of vaccines back in 1991. I thank God ever day for our Naturopathic Physician who informed us. There was not much data back than but I knew intuitively, as the mother of 3 young children that they were ALL toxic. I pass on your work to many - thank you, you are deeply appreciated ...
“Plenty of friends” is not evidence in any universe. C’mon Toby you know better than this. There was no “Delta wave.” Why in the world are you pushing these lies?
If RFK, Jr was president, there would be a Sincere federal effort to do honest research. And seek counsel of actually wise doctors, scientists, researchers, and parents. Dr Kory said yesterday on The Highwire he wouldn't be able to say no if Bobby asked him to hold a position in his gov't.
I listen to the bulwark podcast as a passenger in my husband's car. He and I seem to have opposite views on almost everything, too late now though. Anyway, some of these hosts have a thread of bitchy contempt running through their entire dialog. RFK Jr. is ridiculed often, and called an anti-vaxxer, but he is not, and so why they are maligning a long-time democrat I don't know. Unless they are getting money from pharma for their show, or their education is devoid of an understanding of human physiology, so they are prone to viewing biology through the lens of politics instead of reality.
Indeed, systematic reviews and meta-analyses are very easy to rig. Dr John Ioannidis tried to warn us about that.
Very well said. I would add that there needs to be public debate on this topic.
The perpetrators of $elf-$erving $cience decline to debate.
Beautiful. For decades I've been angry and fighting against the meta-analysis, and now there is a cogent well-written piece I can point to that is not my own writing that I've been sending to anybody willing to read it (Included, in case you are interested): https://tinyurl.com/4pvc36m3
Great work!!! 🙌
Veterinary medicine is being hit especially hard. They are not just killing people but our dogs and cats as well!
What is your opinion on the adjuvant free rabies vaccine? As soon as we started down the vax are bad news train for our humans we stopped all but rabies for our animals and save a few occasions, do thr adjuvant free rabies vax. Interesting study on adjuvants and autoimmune issues in humans--Acronym ASIA ( Autoimmune syndrome Induced by Adjuvants) It explains exactly what happens to me or anyone in my immediate family who gets vaccinated with anything. Yehuda Shoenfeld is the primary researcher.
thanks for the article-
i will look it up.
Rabies is the only vaccine for dogs and cats required by law. There is a livensed 3 year vaccine that is thimerosal-free but you have to ask for it. It is the only one I ise. There was a crowd-funded Rabies Challenge test done by Ronald Schiltz Nd Jean Dodds, both incredible veterinary immunologists. He was my professor and I credit him for teaching me enough that I refused the recent mRNA injection. The study took a grouo of Beagles, vaccinated them for rabies and then challenfed them with the actual virus. No dogs came down with rabies 5 years after vaccination. The results are online.
Thanks. I didn't clarify previously but I was more curious about the SAFETY of the adjuvant free vs traditional than its efficacy per se.
Given that immunity from one dose seems to provide good immunity for longer than a year or three (depending on chosen vax) do you still boost? For our pets we delay as long as possible.
Our Maltese had a bad reaction to his first rabies vax. Couldn't stop itching and trembling. Was traditional vax not pure vax He hasn't has had one since. He's prob going to college with my daughter tho as an ESA so will need to be current. I'm worried about it. New vet uses pure vax on cats I know but he hasn't seen this vet yet so not sure about dogs. I feel near certain it was prob adjuvant related but I'm no doc so idk. Hoping the pure vax really is safer. Thoughts?
Great read as always. Anecdotally I recall the frustration I started feeling in early 2021 trying to understand the “science” behind the EUA for the Pfizer jab, the safe and effective study from the NEJM etc, and communicating the lack of efficacy and honesty to anyone who would listen. What I didn’t realise at the time to my detriment was that it was pointless focusing on statements like “there are no known real world correlates of protection” in these documents, because people simply don’t ascribe corruption to these entities ... of course vaccines are 95% safe and effective! The reality is as you write, the entire edifice is a “tissue of whoppers” to quote Blackadder, an enormous racket at the heart of which is an endless supply of customers for the medical-pharma complex.
The safest way to proceed for everyone is to outright stop vaccinating.
Among the other things to worry about, because pharmaceutical companies are publicly traded stock companies, we have created the situation where people don't have to wait for the companies to bribe them. They can bribe themselves. You buy stock in the company, you push their products, the stock price rises and you collect your reward. It used to be the case where we didn't have to worry about this very much because few people were capable of causing much of a change in stock prices. You watch the most senior government regulators, and maybe a few influential scientists, and just not care about what the rest does because it would hardly matter. Covid was different. If you could convince governments to spend millions on the shots, then of course the price of the stock would go up. Everybody could get in on this action.
Fascinating Toby, in fact astounding.
I did read a piece by Mathew Crawford on RCT's and also a little on Brian Hooker as well as by Sharryl Atkisson and Jim West on Autism.
I was also quite shocked that it seems according to Jim West that Wakefield did not consider toxicology in his Autism study and did not include any conflicts of interest and there were no controls. I see in your Thesis you discussed the Wakefield issue sure you are aware of it but here is the reference:
https://harvoa-med.blogspot.com/2019/08/wakefield.html
Jim west also argues that vaccines are not subject to toxicology testing. I see you do too in your dissertation you discuss it in detail. It is clear that this is ignored everywhere in the Vaccine issue That there is where the bullet must be targeted. For that would hit the main pillar of the fraudsters. I see huge mafia sandbags there though.
Thanks for this eye opener. I agree the financial temptations and investments in vaccines are massive, in fact astronomical and that is why anyone questioning the VIC is smeared and targeted for destruction. There are clear merits that this industry in conflicted from so many angles, one wonders why the authorities don't want to investigate it. Looks like regulatory capture. Skin in the game and GPPP's?
The whole vaccine coverup seems to have the type of momentum the tobacco industry exerted against any voiced dangers of smoking. They eventually lost, and pharma will too, but pharma won't go down without a fight, and they have the funds to drag it out, by paying for fake fact checkers, holding universities to ransom, manipulating the leaders to censor the truth etc.....They won't be able to quash long term the growing awareness of harms from shots, despite the propaganda. That momentum will become adequate leverage to break their stranglehold. We are not nearly there yet though.
Exactly the questions I asked the gal on the phone which she had no answer for. When she couldn't answer my questions, I asked her for the name of the person in charge of all the clinical research studies at UCSD and she gave me two names and their phone numbers - Anthony Magit, M.D. Director UCSD Human Research Protections Program and a person named Rodney who was in charge of the CITI program at UCSD. CITI stands for Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative, a program “dedicated to serving the training needs of colleges and universities, healthcare institutions, technology and research organizations, and governmental agencies, as they foster integrity and professional advancement of their learners.”
I called Anthony Magit and told him I discovered I was enrolled in a clinical research study that I never enrolled in and gave him my clinical research study ID number that I got straight from the IRB department at UCSD. I asked him for the name of the clinical research study and asked him how I became enrolled in a clinical research study that I never signed up for. He said he would look into it and call me back. After a couple of days I called him back and he told me that if I didn’t know the name of the clinical research study I was enrolled in then he couldn’t tell me. I asked how that could be – I gave him my clinical research study ID number along with all my personal information and since he was in charge of all the clinical research studies how could he not know the name of the study I was enrolled in and how I became enrolled in it. His answer was the same, “If you didn’t know the name of the clinical research study you’re enrolled in than I can’t tell you.” He was more interested in knowing how I found out I was enrolled in a clinical research study.
I called Rodney the head of the CITI program at UCSD and he told me the same thing – If I didn’t know the name of the clinical research study I was enrolled in than he couldn’t tell me.
And that is when my whole world view sank to the bottom of the ocean floor.
This is terrifying.
That's wild and horrifying.
Yeah, it is wild and horrifying. So, I made an appointment with psychiatrist because I thought maybe psychiatrist would have shred of empathy and point me in a direction I could go to that would get me off this clinical research study that I never enrolled in. I've never seen or talked to a psychiatrist or a psychologist in my entire life. That was that a bad idea and from personal experience I wouldn't recommend going to a psychiatrist or a psychologist in this day and age.
He said he thought I was paranoid. I said, "why do you think I'm paranoid?" He said, "because I don't have any paperwork to show him." I just stood up and thanked him for his time and politely left.
Psychiatry is a disaster. I'm sorry for what you went through.
Thank you, I'm still going through it.
I can see why it took you eight years to articulate this issue. Not only is it complicated, but the forces arrayed to suppress your description are vast. I, as I suspect most people, felt no compulsion to question the "safe and effective" narrative for most of my life. My grandfather was Doctor in General Practice who sang the praises of the polio vaccine and personally administered my smallpox vaccine. The global warming scam should have been enough to tip me over the edge, as I never have believed that heap of propaganda dedicated to manipulating our every action. COVID's only contribution to the world is that it, and the idiotic reaction to it, caused the scales to fall from the eyes of so many. Thanks. Great article, however sad.
GOD bless you TR for being a true medical TRUTH Warrior. We knew of the dangers of vaccines back in 1991. I thank God ever day for our Naturopathic Physician who informed us. There was not much data back than but I knew intuitively, as the mother of 3 young children that they were ALL toxic. I pass on your work to many - thank you, you are deeply appreciated ...
“Plenty of friends” is not evidence in any universe. C’mon Toby you know better than this. There was no “Delta wave.” Why in the world are you pushing these lies?
Great article
Thx
I read the book of the same name prior to watching the show. My comment stands.
If RFK, Jr was president, there would be a Sincere federal effort to do honest research. And seek counsel of actually wise doctors, scientists, researchers, and parents. Dr Kory said yesterday on The Highwire he wouldn't be able to say no if Bobby asked him to hold a position in his gov't.
Elliot Freed is back. Yeay! https://elliottfreed.substack.com/p/welcome-to-my-new-newsletter
I listen to the bulwark podcast as a passenger in my husband's car. He and I seem to have opposite views on almost everything, too late now though. Anyway, some of these hosts have a thread of bitchy contempt running through their entire dialog. RFK Jr. is ridiculed often, and called an anti-vaxxer, but he is not, and so why they are maligning a long-time democrat I don't know. Unless they are getting money from pharma for their show, or their education is devoid of an understanding of human physiology, so they are prone to viewing biology through the lens of politics instead of reality.