I did read a piece by Mathew Crawford on RCT's and also a little on Brian Hooker as well as by Sharryl Atkisson and Jim West on Autism.
I was also quite shocked that it seems according to Jim West that Wakefield did not consider toxicology in his Autism study and did not include any conflicts of intere…
I did read a piece by Mathew Crawford on RCT's and also a little on Brian Hooker as well as by Sharryl Atkisson and Jim West on Autism.
I was also quite shocked that it seems according to Jim West that Wakefield did not consider toxicology in his Autism study and did not include any conflicts of interest and there were no controls. I see in your Thesis you discussed the Wakefield issue sure you are aware of it but here is the reference:
Jim west also argues that vaccines are not subject to toxicology testing. I see you do too in your dissertation you discuss it in detail. It is clear that this is ignored everywhere in the Vaccine issue That there is where the bullet must be targeted. For that would hit the main pillar of the fraudsters. I see huge mafia sandbags there though.
Thanks for this eye opener. I agree the financial temptations and investments in vaccines are massive, in fact astronomical and that is why anyone questioning the VIC is smeared and targeted for destruction. There are clear merits that this industry in conflicted from so many angles, one wonders why the authorities don't want to investigate it. Looks like regulatory capture. Skin in the game and GPPP's?
Fascinating Toby, in fact astounding.
I did read a piece by Mathew Crawford on RCT's and also a little on Brian Hooker as well as by Sharryl Atkisson and Jim West on Autism.
I was also quite shocked that it seems according to Jim West that Wakefield did not consider toxicology in his Autism study and did not include any conflicts of interest and there were no controls. I see in your Thesis you discussed the Wakefield issue sure you are aware of it but here is the reference:
https://harvoa-med.blogspot.com/2019/08/wakefield.html
Jim west also argues that vaccines are not subject to toxicology testing. I see you do too in your dissertation you discuss it in detail. It is clear that this is ignored everywhere in the Vaccine issue That there is where the bullet must be targeted. For that would hit the main pillar of the fraudsters. I see huge mafia sandbags there though.
Thanks for this eye opener. I agree the financial temptations and investments in vaccines are massive, in fact astronomical and that is why anyone questioning the VIC is smeared and targeted for destruction. There are clear merits that this industry in conflicted from so many angles, one wonders why the authorities don't want to investigate it. Looks like regulatory capture. Skin in the game and GPPP's?