No. I have made it clear that they should be withdrawn from the market. But these things exist now. And the actions of the FDA have removed any incentive to make a good product or to improve the product over time. That's all that I was pointing out.
No. I have made it clear that they should be withdrawn from the market. But these things exist now. And the actions of the FDA have removed any incentive to make a good product or to improve the product over time. That's all that I was pointing out.
It seems to me that the FDA is transactional. The people there are concerned with keeping their jobs, paying their mortgage, and making more money in the future.
btw, I'm not trying to be prosecutorial. What you are saying is very much in line with Dr. Robert Malone said in an interview with Candace Owens. Referenced here:
It's hard, very hard...to realize that evil gets done with regular folks paying the bills.
It's hard because it ultimately implicates all of us. We all have to make trade offs to survive.
So this is what I think about a lot. And all you have to do to cull the herd, if you wanted, say.
Is set up incentive structures.
But if you keep following the incentive structures up the chain in every field, they all connect somewhere in the Black Rock, State Street, Vanguard universe. And if you keep following them, there is some darkness setting up the incentive structures.
Darkness that is about far more than $$$, as they already have more than they can ever spend.
So why? Why set up those incentive structures? Why?
No. I have made it clear that they should be withdrawn from the market. But these things exist now. And the actions of the FDA have removed any incentive to make a good product or to improve the product over time. That's all that I was pointing out.
Do you still roughly adhere to the guiding premise that the FDA is concerned with public health?
Tough question but it's straightforward.
It seems to me that the FDA is transactional. The people there are concerned with keeping their jobs, paying their mortgage, and making more money in the future.
btw, I'm not trying to be prosecutorial. What you are saying is very much in line with Dr. Robert Malone said in an interview with Candace Owens. Referenced here:
https://sagehana.substack.com/p/determining-credibility-2-a-simple?s=w
But any way you slice it. It's corruption.
It's hard, very hard...to realize that evil gets done with regular folks paying the bills.
It's hard because it ultimately implicates all of us. We all have to make trade offs to survive.
So this is what I think about a lot. And all you have to do to cull the herd, if you wanted, say.
Is set up incentive structures.
But if you keep following the incentive structures up the chain in every field, they all connect somewhere in the Black Rock, State Street, Vanguard universe. And if you keep following them, there is some darkness setting up the incentive structures.
Darkness that is about far more than $$$, as they already have more than they can ever spend.
So why? Why set up those incentive structures? Why?
And thus if these goals are in opposition to public health?
And they are.
Then one must conclude that the FDA is not concerned with pubic health, yes?
Any more, say, than the Corporate News is not concerned with presenting a full representation of events.