Just here to say that as I am slogging through the CDC list I am developing a very strong distaste for all things "Medical Officer," "Epidemic Intelligence Service, "Preventive Medicine Officer," and everything else that smacks of "public health" or "preventive health" or such. It sounds like so much blather for "we want to control your lives, but it's all for your own well being."
(I'm looking up the brief bios/CVs for each person, and my emails to pediatricians are slightly different than ones to adult drs. And the numbers of them who are one of the above is just making me want to throw up.)
Know that the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) is for the purpose of indemnifying Pfizer from lawsuits as a result of harm caused to children by its vaccine. So to using the EUA obviously carries with it the potential of harm that vaccine maker knows its vaccine may cause. Otherwise, why this desperate attempt to protect itself - especially after its tests on children failed?
Correction on the WSJ article:, with due respect: It's not just "healthy kids don't need vaccines" - vaccines are even more dangerous for children with pre-existing conditions. It's also what causes many of the massive under-reporting, and cover-ups.
I know to just write the letter; its numbers, momentum, persistence, a solid conveyance of the outcry of Americans over this travesty. Too bad they are not seated directly in front of the American People!
NO child should be jabbed with these horrific vaccines to prevent a disease that doesn’t even happen in children. Pfizer's Fauci-sponsored testing of its vaccines on children resulted in most of the children suffering lifelong severe disabilities, and many died.
can you send me a ready to mail or email letter, my english is not the best and i like it clear, to the point, and quick to do in my own daily challenges (time wise and health wise)
Toby, the article and contact information are outstanding. A lot of work goes into the article! Thank You for this excellent resource.
At this point, I do not believe I have the patience to write and convey language in a ‘please…’ appeal letter to these bureaucrats without expressing very very strong language, to the detriment of the letter’s effectiveness.
I’m all for stopping this shot but if phizer owns cdc and fda as quoted in previous article that brought me to this page then I believe at that point all one can do is make sure they don’t take the jab and spread knowledge to the others,, the government, cdc, fda, etc. have engaged in war with you and yet you still keep bending over for more
Thanks again, Toby, for your leadership in this call to action! I drafted a new letter, and I'm just wondering if you or anyone sees anything incorrect or problematic in it. I don't have a ton of background in tobacco, but I keep thinking about it and the seeming parallels. Recently it also occurred to me that the whole tobacco thing might actually be fairly close to home for some of these folks? I don't know, just a thought. In case anyone has a minute to glance at this one before I start sending it off . . . thanks!
Dear ______,
I am writing to share my grave concern about Pfizer’s plans to submit another EUA application for a COVID-19 vaccine for children 6 months-4 years old, despite the lack of medical necessity and the egregious level of risk that we have already suffered from this shot for the other age groups. I sincerely request you to deeply consider the following before you cast your vote (of conscience):
1. Consider how desperate Pfizer is to get their COVID-19 shot onto the children’s vaccine schedule. They are undoubtedly motivated to do and say anything to try to get that accomplished because it’s their ticket to liability protection for this product. As you know, they can’t get it onto the schedule if they don’t first get this most vulnerable age group approved. Please do not pretend that this this context is irrelevant.
2. Kindly also bring to mind everything we now know about Tobacco industry ‘science.’ When the financial and reputational stakes are as high as they currently are, what would prevent a pharmaceutical company from acting precisely the same as a tobacco company? At this point in history, the term “Tobacco science” has practically become a household euphemism for ‘fraudulent-science-used-to-manipulate-the-population-at-the-expense-of -public-health’.
We are counting on you to pierce through the charade and insist on an honest, robust, scientific risk/benefit analysis for our nation’s most innocent and vulnerable population. We can’t undo the injustice done to the other age groups that were approved for this shot without sufficient evidence of safety or efficacy, but it’s in your hands now to help prevent an even greater tragedy. One honest, clear-headed voice can activate others!
We are witnessing intentional genocide by the elite gatekeepers who believe in a scorched earth policy to reduce the global population. The death toll when it all is counted in the west is going to be incalcuable. Perhaps this is God's judgment over us for allowing abortion to go on unfettered for 50 years?
Mar 25, 2022·edited Mar 25, 2022Liked by Toby Rogers
"reject Pfizer's junk science mRNA shots inKIDS UNDER 5". And what about kids OVER 5? What about adults? Is it ok for them? Saying we have to stop it for the "kids under 5" indirectly suggests, that it's ok for everyone else. Why do we have to tip-toe around the simple fact: this kills shot is detrimental to everyone with no benefit in exchange. It's like a very bad business deal, where you pay 10% off for something that not only doesn't work, but has the potential to maim or kill you. It should be ditched altogether and the people responsible are jailed or executed. Period.
Done! I put all the ACIP folks in the "To:" line, and all the others in the "CC:" line. Reworded a few things to make the points even 'friendlier' and/or more impactful. Already getting a barrage of automatic "out of the office" replies. Hmmm... I'll post again if I get anything of actual value.
Just here to say that as I am slogging through the CDC list I am developing a very strong distaste for all things "Medical Officer," "Epidemic Intelligence Service, "Preventive Medicine Officer," and everything else that smacks of "public health" or "preventive health" or such. It sounds like so much blather for "we want to control your lives, but it's all for your own well being."
(I'm looking up the brief bios/CVs for each person, and my emails to pediatricians are slightly different than ones to adult drs. And the numbers of them who are one of the above is just making me want to throw up.)
Know that the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) is for the purpose of indemnifying Pfizer from lawsuits as a result of harm caused to children by its vaccine. So to using the EUA obviously carries with it the potential of harm that vaccine maker knows its vaccine may cause. Otherwise, why this desperate attempt to protect itself - especially after its tests on children failed?
Correction on the WSJ article:, with due respect: It's not just "healthy kids don't need vaccines" - vaccines are even more dangerous for children with pre-existing conditions. It's also what causes many of the massive under-reporting, and cover-ups.
I know to just write the letter; its numbers, momentum, persistence, a solid conveyance of the outcry of Americans over this travesty. Too bad they are not seated directly in front of the American People!
Remember their names and which way they vote.
NO child should be jabbed with these horrific vaccines to prevent a disease that doesn’t even happen in children. Pfizer's Fauci-sponsored testing of its vaccines on children resulted in most of the children suffering lifelong severe disabilities, and many died.
can you send me a ready to mail or email letter, my english is not the best and i like it clear, to the point, and quick to do in my own daily challenges (time wise and health wise)
Done, done, and done. I wrote them all paper letters and will dash off a quick email at the start of next week.
Toby, the article and contact information are outstanding. A lot of work goes into the article! Thank You for this excellent resource.
At this point, I do not believe I have the patience to write and convey language in a ‘please…’ appeal letter to these bureaucrats without expressing very very strong language, to the detriment of the letter’s effectiveness.
I’m all for stopping this shot but if phizer owns cdc and fda as quoted in previous article that brought me to this page then I believe at that point all one can do is make sure they don’t take the jab and spread knowledge to the others,, the government, cdc, fda, etc. have engaged in war with you and yet you still keep bending over for more
Thanks again, Toby, for your leadership in this call to action! I drafted a new letter, and I'm just wondering if you or anyone sees anything incorrect or problematic in it. I don't have a ton of background in tobacco, but I keep thinking about it and the seeming parallels. Recently it also occurred to me that the whole tobacco thing might actually be fairly close to home for some of these folks? I don't know, just a thought. In case anyone has a minute to glance at this one before I start sending it off . . . thanks!
Dear ______,
I am writing to share my grave concern about Pfizer’s plans to submit another EUA application for a COVID-19 vaccine for children 6 months-4 years old, despite the lack of medical necessity and the egregious level of risk that we have already suffered from this shot for the other age groups. I sincerely request you to deeply consider the following before you cast your vote (of conscience):
1. Consider how desperate Pfizer is to get their COVID-19 shot onto the children’s vaccine schedule. They are undoubtedly motivated to do and say anything to try to get that accomplished because it’s their ticket to liability protection for this product. As you know, they can’t get it onto the schedule if they don’t first get this most vulnerable age group approved. Please do not pretend that this this context is irrelevant.
2. Kindly also bring to mind everything we now know about Tobacco industry ‘science.’ When the financial and reputational stakes are as high as they currently are, what would prevent a pharmaceutical company from acting precisely the same as a tobacco company? At this point in history, the term “Tobacco science” has practically become a household euphemism for ‘fraudulent-science-used-to-manipulate-the-population-at-the-expense-of -public-health’.
We are counting on you to pierce through the charade and insist on an honest, robust, scientific risk/benefit analysis for our nation’s most innocent and vulnerable population. We can’t undo the injustice done to the other age groups that were approved for this shot without sufficient evidence of safety or efficacy, but it’s in your hands now to help prevent an even greater tragedy. One honest, clear-headed voice can activate others!
Thank you in advance for doing the right thing.
Sincerely,
We are witnessing intentional genocide by the elite gatekeepers who believe in a scorched earth policy to reduce the global population. The death toll when it all is counted in the west is going to be incalcuable. Perhaps this is God's judgment over us for allowing abortion to go on unfettered for 50 years?
"reject Pfizer's junk science mRNA shots inKIDS UNDER 5". And what about kids OVER 5? What about adults? Is it ok for them? Saying we have to stop it for the "kids under 5" indirectly suggests, that it's ok for everyone else. Why do we have to tip-toe around the simple fact: this kills shot is detrimental to everyone with no benefit in exchange. It's like a very bad business deal, where you pay 10% off for something that not only doesn't work, but has the potential to maim or kill you. It should be ditched altogether and the people responsible are jailed or executed. Period.
Done! I put all the ACIP folks in the "To:" line, and all the others in the "CC:" line. Reworded a few things to make the points even 'friendlier' and/or more impactful. Already getting a barrage of automatic "out of the office" replies. Hmmm... I'll post again if I get anything of actual value.
Now they are pushing Moderna, since people aren't including Moderna they will ignore these demands on respect to Moderna's death shot.
I emailed 1/2. Will do the rest tomorrow. I got one auto response that Alejandra.Gurtman@pfizer.com is out of office.
SARAH LONG EMAIL sarah.long@drexelmed.edu I searched the NIH for her publications and found the link in an attached document in the NIH post. https://www.journalofinfection.com/article/S0163-4453(16)30052-4/fulltext Full length article| Volume 72, SUPPLEMENT , S68-S76, July 05, 2016
Diagnosis and management of undifferentiated fever in children
Sarah S. Long
Sarah S. Long
Correspondence
St. Christopher's Hospital for Children, 160 E. Erie Avenue, Section of Infectious Diseases, USA. Tel.: +1 215 427 5204; fax: +1 215 427 8389.
Contact
Affiliations
Drexel University College of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, St. Christopher's Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, PA, USA