Great article, Toby! And thank you for the shout out regarding my quarantine camp lawsuit victory over New York's tyrannical Governor Hochul. Keep up the great work!
Yet another brilliant analysis… I was just talking about Pan to a friend last night. When I lived in California for about a decade, I realized that he was the irrational driving force who pushed hard for vaccinating all children at all and any cost. It made no health sense, but it did make Hell sense. I always wondered if he was a plant from China.
Thank you for this article. Meet Josh Coleman--he is my hero. His son was paralyzed by the DTaP. He was a cameraman on the "Vaxxed" tour when I first learned of him; he started "V is for Vaccine" in CA, a movement which spread to NYC, Hawaii, Seattle, etc. He has followed and been Pan's nemesis for years... https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10229959996161998&set=a.3583508544365
Garret Hardin later had to admit that his conclusion in The Tragedy of the Commons was wrong: history does not prove that people will inevitably mismanage the Commons, rather the contrary. Gardin's thesis was just a Trojan horse for more capture of public lands by private, corporate ownership in the goal so succinctly captured by the WEF slogan: "You will own nothing and be happy." And of course, pay rent for everything from land to air to your technocrat overlords. Talk to any farmer and they will tell you how stupid they'd have to be to over-exploit their land. This typically happens when farmers are taken off the land and corporate agribusiness takes over, with its sole value being maximizing profits. The same applies to forestry: the larger logging corporations have become here in Canada, the worse and more harmful their practices have become. If instead we gave life leases to smaller portions of forest to family-based operations, it would be treated as a legacy to protect and manage wisely for their descendants. Small operators have already proven it.
Here in the Cowichan Valley they are attacking farms through "Water Scarcity" and "Climate Catastrophe". There is an "Atmospheric River" bringing 300! mm of rain this week on the western exposures.
The Official Community Plans and climate remediation scams have been passed down through WEF/UN/ IPCC globalists to their national, provincial, and local minions and useful idiots.
The Epoch Times documentary "No Farmers, No Food" is an important record of the background and agenda.
There's a good documentary from the BC interior near Kamloops where BC Resource Officers came in like storm troopers to shut down an entire farming valley, even seeking out the well pump houses and trying to shut them down. You know you're in trouble when "resource officers" arrive in bulletproof vests and other cop-like gear. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9J5LuFijhBc
"Digital health" sounds like spyware and tracking to me. Anybody with a science, technology, or healthcare background could make a case for being one of the experts. People like Toby are already "blown," but I believe there are many good people with the right background (who are not yet known to the PTB) who could be part of this.
I enjoyed your article but disagree when you make a claim there are trillions of viruses, especially since no one has ever actually found a virus. Bacteria, yes, viruses, no. Scientists have been able to see and isolate exosomes in the body that may be what virologists are confusing with viruses under an electron microscope. But even then, the only way they can ever "see" a virus is after mixing fluid from a person suspected of being sick from a virus with a melange of other components like antibiotics, fetal bovine serum and including cells usually cancer cells or African green monkey cells and then starving them. Then when the cells start to break down they see some debris they say is a virus. But as far as I know, a control experiment watching the same mixture sans the fluid suspected of containing a virus produces the same cell lysis. This does not occur in the real world and in no way proves either existence of a virus.
I did not make claim that there are millions of viruses. I did not write the piece. And the lacking evidence for viruses is the weakness in the piece. I agree with you when it comes to the unscientific method scientists use to claim they isolate viruses.
Are you willing to rubber stamp the new "improved" international treaty as drafted by the privately owned World Heath Organization and your sovereign government concerning health care and pandemics. It smacks of totalitarianism, dictatorship and the death of democracy. VOTE NO !!!!
"... the WHO can provide guidance, give recommendations and technical advice to member nations. But countries, he said, retain “all of their sovereign right to make their own domestic health policies, ranging from treatment to mass mandates and lockdowns and everything in between.” "
Bunch of hysterical little girls whing about some Boogeyman organization
I wish that were true, but the original text was altered to make the provisions of the two treaties concerning health care and pandemics legally binding. What I particularly I dislike are the mandatory vaccinations and lockdowns. In any case as a matter of principle, why should any sovereign nation make a legally binding treaty that carries the force of law with an unelected private corporation that can act as a dictatorship.
Will the WHO be given the power to impose restrictive measures?
Recent reports have highlighted concerns that the WHO may be given powers to impose certain restrictive measures such as lockdowns, mandatory quarantines, or mandatory vaccines.
The proposed treaty does not currently have any provisions for such measures, nor grant the WHO such powers. When asked during a Parliamentary debate whether the UK Government could give assurances that the UK would not accede sovereignty and power to the WHO the government Minister (Anne-Marie Trevelyan) said:
Yes, absolutely I can. The speculation that somehow the instrument will undermine UK sovereignty and give WHO powers over national public health measures is simply not the case. I absolutely reassure both my right hon. Friend and my hon. Friend the Member for Hastings and Rye (Sally-Ann Hart), who raised a similar issue earlier, on behalf of all their constituents: that is not the case. The UK remains in control of any future domestic decisions about public health matters—such as domestic vaccination—that might be needed in any future pandemic that we may have to manage. Protecting those national sovereign rights is a distinct principle in the existing draft text. … that is absolutely not under threat.
It appears that most concerns originate from a single set of proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR), suggested by Bangladesh
Check Articles 13 and 15 in particular - Nothing you're so terrified of is actually proposed
Nowhere in this document is their a proposal to give WHO the authority to override the decisions of any member state, nor to give up its national sovereignty.
There are no WHO mandated vaccines, lockdowns or anything else. And you keep writing about "an un-elected private corporation." You seem to be deluded. You have consumed copious amounts of excrement and now regurgitate it. You partit drivel in your quest for fear and rage
The WHO mandates and lockdown Treaty have already been drafted, awaiting signature from countries in the EU and US. See the video by Dr. John Campbell where a Dutch lawyer spills the beans.
Oct 9, 2023·edited Oct 9, 2023Liked by Toby Rogers
As someone from a fishing family, I've always had both respect for and skepticism of the "tragedy of the commons." Fishermen generally paid close attention to the health of their fishing grounds.
Dory boat fishermen and long-liners who caught their fish on hooks initially resisted and were skeptical of trawling or "dragging" technology which was introduced by the U.S. government because it would both bruise the fish and disturb the bottom which neither seine nets nor gill nets did. But ultimately, the safer and more productive dragging replaced the dorymen and long-liners.
Then "Catch-Shares" and "Days-At-Sea" schemes resulted in fishermen having to throw large portions of their hawls of dead fish overboard in the name of "stock preservation." The fishermen begged to be allowed to land the dead fish and at least let it be donated to hospitals and schools, but nope - the dead fish were required to be dumped back in the sea so the boat wouldn't exceed its daily quota. Neither would the government allow the boat quota be applied to several days. So, boats were forced to go to sea on multiple days using more fuel and assuming more risk just to throw away more dead fish each day than they landed..... which according to the US. government was to protect the fishing grounds from rapacious fishermen and the "tragedy of the Commons."
Oh yes, and not only did fishermen often have to pay for a government observer , but also the U.S. Coast Guard would board boats with guns in hand to inspect their catches.
Again an exceptionally strong piece. Unfortunately I believed CDC and big pharma had our best interest at heart. Now I realize the error of my ways. Looking for a new primary physician due his brainwashing and inability to see reality!
I’ve recently applied this logic to my pets as well. They carry diseases yea, but so do we. No more annual visits to the vet. The number of animals with allergies and cancer should be enough to wake up owners. Parents too… but clearly majority go along with the madness.
"In an earlier era, when public health focused on large public works projects, health improved. Now that public health focuses almost exclusively on promoting vaccines, health and well-being have plummeted."
Bingo. We should be giving Nobel Peace Prizes to garbage men and sewer workers. They continue to save humanity and make life more tolerable for all of us than ANY "important" medical industrial complex worker out there.
Before my undergraduate degree in industrial metallurgy at the College if Advanced Technology I worked for Albright & Wilson in Oldbury as a lab technician. One of my projects concerned the treatment of industrial effluent using bacteria. What is your area of expertise may I ask ?
Toby Rogers, thank you for your discussion of the commons. It is foundational, and can be pursued more. One of them is the closure of art in all the museums to every person who can not afford it. It also limits the frequency of such visits. Thus, a fee becomes a gate, a closure of what was once a cultural commons. That cultural commons is at the heart of our civilization and thus very important. There was a time when I visited the Morgan library every day after school. Impossible now. The power of the art at the Morgan, the Met, the Frick and the Modern is only felt with continual visits. Frequency should be encouraged. The first time I visited Manhattan, all museums were free. I spent my Sundays in museums. The Cleveland Museum of Art, understands it is housing the commons, and remains free to all. It encourages frequent visits. Could it be because Cleveland's culture grew from its founding as the Western Reserve after the Shay's Rebellion?
I don't know if it's still that way, but when we lived in Pa., the Philadelphia Art Museum was free to anyone who received SNAP. Not the same as free to everyone, but at least the people running the museum recognize that one school trip a year is not enough, and that for some people, that truly is all they would get if someone didn't open the gates to them. When I lived in NYC, the Met was "pay what you wish," but I could afford the cheapest membership ($65/yr, at the time), so I paid for that, and went nearly every weekend.
I didn't know that Manhattan museums used to be free. Indeed, art is being closed off. My wife and I signed up for a Bank of America card just for free NYC museum weekends. Not quite worth it in hindsight.
Still in the control group for the 6 or so mRNA shots thus far. I’m not sure how mRNA in an airborne delivery method will survive the effects of UV light even for a short period of time.
I was responding to the preceding comment by some guy named Rob:
"Rob
Oct 7
Still in the control group for the 6 or so mRNA shots thus far. I’m not sure how mRNA in an airborne delivery method will survive the effects of UV light even for a short period of time."
thank you
Great article, Toby! And thank you for the shout out regarding my quarantine camp lawsuit victory over New York's tyrannical Governor Hochul. Keep up the great work!
Outstanding post. Thank you.
Yet another brilliant analysis… I was just talking about Pan to a friend last night. When I lived in California for about a decade, I realized that he was the irrational driving force who pushed hard for vaccinating all children at all and any cost. It made no health sense, but it did make Hell sense. I always wondered if he was a plant from China.
Thank you for this article. Meet Josh Coleman--he is my hero. His son was paralyzed by the DTaP. He was a cameraman on the "Vaxxed" tour when I first learned of him; he started "V is for Vaccine" in CA, a movement which spread to NYC, Hawaii, Seattle, etc. He has followed and been Pan's nemesis for years... https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10229959996161998&set=a.3583508544365
Garret Hardin later had to admit that his conclusion in The Tragedy of the Commons was wrong: history does not prove that people will inevitably mismanage the Commons, rather the contrary. Gardin's thesis was just a Trojan horse for more capture of public lands by private, corporate ownership in the goal so succinctly captured by the WEF slogan: "You will own nothing and be happy." And of course, pay rent for everything from land to air to your technocrat overlords. Talk to any farmer and they will tell you how stupid they'd have to be to over-exploit their land. This typically happens when farmers are taken off the land and corporate agribusiness takes over, with its sole value being maximizing profits. The same applies to forestry: the larger logging corporations have become here in Canada, the worse and more harmful their practices have become. If instead we gave life leases to smaller portions of forest to family-based operations, it would be treated as a legacy to protect and manage wisely for their descendants. Small operators have already proven it.
Here in the Cowichan Valley they are attacking farms through "Water Scarcity" and "Climate Catastrophe". There is an "Atmospheric River" bringing 300! mm of rain this week on the western exposures.
The Official Community Plans and climate remediation scams have been passed down through WEF/UN/ IPCC globalists to their national, provincial, and local minions and useful idiots.
The Epoch Times documentary "No Farmers, No Food" is an important record of the background and agenda.
There's a good documentary from the BC interior near Kamloops where BC Resource Officers came in like storm troopers to shut down an entire farming valley, even seeking out the well pump houses and trying to shut them down. You know you're in trouble when "resource officers" arrive in bulletproof vests and other cop-like gear. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9J5LuFijhBc
This is why I don't think anyone else considers Hardin to be on the left.
Not sure where to put this, so I'll put it here: These committees can be powerful, so if any intrepid member of the good team would like to sacrifice time and effort to take a seat (and box out the bad team from that seat, at least) on a new FDA advisory committee, here's how: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/digital-health-center-excellence/fda-digital-health-advisory-committee
"Digital health" sounds like spyware and tracking to me. Anybody with a science, technology, or healthcare background could make a case for being one of the experts. People like Toby are already "blown," but I believe there are many good people with the right background (who are not yet known to the PTB) who could be part of this.
I enjoyed your article but disagree when you make a claim there are trillions of viruses, especially since no one has ever actually found a virus. Bacteria, yes, viruses, no. Scientists have been able to see and isolate exosomes in the body that may be what virologists are confusing with viruses under an electron microscope. But even then, the only way they can ever "see" a virus is after mixing fluid from a person suspected of being sick from a virus with a melange of other components like antibiotics, fetal bovine serum and including cells usually cancer cells or African green monkey cells and then starving them. Then when the cells start to break down they see some debris they say is a virus. But as far as I know, a control experiment watching the same mixture sans the fluid suspected of containing a virus produces the same cell lysis. This does not occur in the real world and in no way proves either existence of a virus.
I did not make claim that there are millions of viruses. I did not write the piece. And the lacking evidence for viruses is the weakness in the piece. I agree with you when it comes to the unscientific method scientists use to claim they isolate viruses.
I consider that the exosomes are what many/most scientists call viruses.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/e-is-for-exosomes/
"viruses" are woke, libtard, WEF psyops
Are you willing to rubber stamp the new "improved" international treaty as drafted by the privately owned World Heath Organization and your sovereign government concerning health care and pandemics. It smacks of totalitarianism, dictatorship and the death of democracy. VOTE NO !!!!
https://youtu.be/kCoFLhDKlA4
The obsession here with WHO is amusing:
"... the WHO can provide guidance, give recommendations and technical advice to member nations. But countries, he said, retain “all of their sovereign right to make their own domestic health policies, ranging from treatment to mass mandates and lockdowns and everything in between.” "
Bunch of hysterical little girls whing about some Boogeyman organization
I wish that were true, but the original text was altered to make the provisions of the two treaties concerning health care and pandemics legally binding. What I particularly I dislike are the mandatory vaccinations and lockdowns. In any case as a matter of principle, why should any sovereign nation make a legally binding treaty that carries the force of law with an unelected private corporation that can act as a dictatorship.
June 2023 UK Parliament Research Briefing (Page-11, Section 3.6)
https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-9550/CBP-9550.pdf
Will the WHO be given the power to impose restrictive measures?
Recent reports have highlighted concerns that the WHO may be given powers to impose certain restrictive measures such as lockdowns, mandatory quarantines, or mandatory vaccines.
The proposed treaty does not currently have any provisions for such measures, nor grant the WHO such powers. When asked during a Parliamentary debate whether the UK Government could give assurances that the UK would not accede sovereignty and power to the WHO the government Minister (Anne-Marie Trevelyan) said:
Yes, absolutely I can. The speculation that somehow the instrument will undermine UK sovereignty and give WHO powers over national public health measures is simply not the case. I absolutely reassure both my right hon. Friend and my hon. Friend the Member for Hastings and Rye (Sally-Ann Hart), who raised a similar issue earlier, on behalf of all their constituents: that is not the case. The UK remains in control of any future domestic decisions about public health matters—such as domestic vaccination—that might be needed in any future pandemic that we may have to manage. Protecting those national sovereign rights is a distinct principle in the existing draft text. … that is absolutely not under threat.
It appears that most concerns originate from a single set of proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR), suggested by Bangladesh
I'm not sure that this is the most recent version, but;
https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA75/A75_18-en.pdf
Check Articles 13 and 15 in particular - Nothing you're so terrified of is actually proposed
Nowhere in this document is their a proposal to give WHO the authority to override the decisions of any member state, nor to give up its national sovereignty.
That was written in April 2022 and was indeed advisory, but now the text has been altered to make the provisions mandatory. Sneaky.
There are no WHO mandated vaccines, lockdowns or anything else. And you keep writing about "an un-elected private corporation." You seem to be deluded. You have consumed copious amounts of excrement and now regurgitate it. You partit drivel in your quest for fear and rage
Refer me to the relevant sections or paragraphs.
The WHO mandates and lockdown Treaty have already been drafted, awaiting signature from countries in the EU and US. See the video by Dr. John Campbell where a Dutch lawyer spills the beans.
https://youtu.be/kCoFLhDKlA4
As someone from a fishing family, I've always had both respect for and skepticism of the "tragedy of the commons." Fishermen generally paid close attention to the health of their fishing grounds.
Dory boat fishermen and long-liners who caught their fish on hooks initially resisted and were skeptical of trawling or "dragging" technology which was introduced by the U.S. government because it would both bruise the fish and disturb the bottom which neither seine nets nor gill nets did. But ultimately, the safer and more productive dragging replaced the dorymen and long-liners.
Then "Catch-Shares" and "Days-At-Sea" schemes resulted in fishermen having to throw large portions of their hawls of dead fish overboard in the name of "stock preservation." The fishermen begged to be allowed to land the dead fish and at least let it be donated to hospitals and schools, but nope - the dead fish were required to be dumped back in the sea so the boat wouldn't exceed its daily quota. Neither would the government allow the boat quota be applied to several days. So, boats were forced to go to sea on multiple days using more fuel and assuming more risk just to throw away more dead fish each day than they landed..... which according to the US. government was to protect the fishing grounds from rapacious fishermen and the "tragedy of the Commons."
Oh yes, and not only did fishermen often have to pay for a government observer , but also the U.S. Coast Guard would board boats with guns in hand to inspect their catches.
Brilliant article !!
Again an exceptionally strong piece. Unfortunately I believed CDC and big pharma had our best interest at heart. Now I realize the error of my ways. Looking for a new primary physician due his brainwashing and inability to see reality!
I’ve recently applied this logic to my pets as well. They carry diseases yea, but so do we. No more annual visits to the vet. The number of animals with allergies and cancer should be enough to wake up owners. Parents too… but clearly majority go along with the madness.
"In an earlier era, when public health focused on large public works projects, health improved. Now that public health focuses almost exclusively on promoting vaccines, health and well-being have plummeted."
Bingo. We should be giving Nobel Peace Prizes to garbage men and sewer workers. They continue to save humanity and make life more tolerable for all of us than ANY "important" medical industrial complex worker out there.
You might want to look up the history of public works projects in the US.
Public health never focused on large public works projects, or vice versa.
Water supply and management affect public health, but otherwise ..
And public health does not "focus almost exclusively on promoting vaccines."
How about the Hoover Dam ?
Seriously?
"Water supply and management affect public health, but otherwise .."
I have a science doctorate as well, but I had to do some reading and writing undergraduate.
But you? Seemingly not.
Before my undergraduate degree in industrial metallurgy at the College if Advanced Technology I worked for Albright & Wilson in Oldbury as a lab technician. One of my projects concerned the treatment of industrial effluent using bacteria. What is your area of expertise may I ask ?
STEM Ph.D. actually.
Seriously (again)?
"I have a science doctorate as well ... "
Hey, get this !
Billionaire Bill Gates has admitted that there is no “climate crisis” in a major U-turn on his prior statements promoting “global warming.”
“There’s a lot of climate exaggeration,” said Gates at a recent event.
Ph.D. University of Birmingham 1967.
My dissertation concerned deformation and fracture in metal machining.
Toby Rogers, thank you for your discussion of the commons. It is foundational, and can be pursued more. One of them is the closure of art in all the museums to every person who can not afford it. It also limits the frequency of such visits. Thus, a fee becomes a gate, a closure of what was once a cultural commons. That cultural commons is at the heart of our civilization and thus very important. There was a time when I visited the Morgan library every day after school. Impossible now. The power of the art at the Morgan, the Met, the Frick and the Modern is only felt with continual visits. Frequency should be encouraged. The first time I visited Manhattan, all museums were free. I spent my Sundays in museums. The Cleveland Museum of Art, understands it is housing the commons, and remains free to all. It encourages frequent visits. Could it be because Cleveland's culture grew from its founding as the Western Reserve after the Shay's Rebellion?
Moisha Blechman
I don't know if it's still that way, but when we lived in Pa., the Philadelphia Art Museum was free to anyone who received SNAP. Not the same as free to everyone, but at least the people running the museum recognize that one school trip a year is not enough, and that for some people, that truly is all they would get if someone didn't open the gates to them. When I lived in NYC, the Met was "pay what you wish," but I could afford the cheapest membership ($65/yr, at the time), so I paid for that, and went nearly every weekend.
Definitely. Shay's Rebellion for sure
I didn't know that Manhattan museums used to be free. Indeed, art is being closed off. My wife and I signed up for a Bank of America card just for free NYC museum weekends. Not quite worth it in hindsight.
Still in the control group for the 6 or so mRNA shots thus far. I’m not sure how mRNA in an airborne delivery method will survive the effects of UV light even for a short period of time.
Nanoparticles encapsulation and graphene oxide coatings are both UV protective.
Protective of what ?
"UV protective"
English not your language?
Well, UV stands for ultra violet light.
But whose skin are you protecting and with what ?
I was responding to the preceding comment by some guy named Rob:
"Rob
Oct 7
Still in the control group for the 6 or so mRNA shots thus far. I’m not sure how mRNA in an airborne delivery method will survive the effects of UV light even for a short period of time."
Loony questions call for loony answers
Thank you for the explanation.
Well, whoever wants to launch airborne mRNA should do it at night :-)
One correction. Big Pharma doesn't discriminate, it gives equally to both Democrats and Republicans, just in case...