THCV to the rescue? Can you use these techniques to market it?
How does the cartel send exactly the right message at exactly the right time to get you to take that deadly shot? While I didn't fall for it, 17 months ago I got that message while walking the dog at the park. Dunno how, though my cell phone was in my back pocket. It said I'd just get saline, and would then get a vax pass. Edward Bernays and Vannevar Bush must have been on the same team!
I find myself partly agreeing with the first half of your essay and agreeing 100% with the latter half. the 2020 election was stolen - full stop. I've done as much, if not more research on election integrity and all the evidence is out there - but you have to look of course. All the same tactics deployed to the naysayers of the vax were deployed against those who investigated election integrity. Therefore, while they do have immense personal data on all of us - they still needed multiple, coordinated efforts to rig either the voter, the machine, or the ballot processing - or a combination of all three to pull it off. As for social media and big tech. I engage as little as I can get away with. No FB, IG, Twitter, TikTok. No Google. Use Brave, DuckDuckGo (though need an alternative to them, just been lazy). My kids will not own a cell phone - and according to my daughter she's the only one in her class still without one. I don't care! They have control only if we give it to them and allow it. I often wonder what would happen if we all just quit social media one day - like everyone ditched their FB, Twitter and IG accounts all at once. A true walk-away campaign. It's not difficult! Then what would they do??
Scientists tell me 100% of the people who took the shots will be dead within three years, with the peak of the dieoff in the winter of '23-'24. The autoimmunity is inexorable and deaths will come from organ failures, including heart failure, and cancers (the surge in which is already a 9-sigma event).
So people who remain are going to be strong medical freedom people.
It's so clear to me that the 2022 midterms are being rigged that I see no point in engaging in the fake elections at all. I refuse to choose between the governor who banned early treatment for Covid in my state and the military intelligence plant who just staged a fake mass stabbing on the Las Vegas Strip.
I think we have to turn our backs on this government and these corporations and create parallel government and economic structures, the sooner the better. The IRS threw out 30 million W-2s and 1099s in 2021. They aren't even bothering to process returns except to send refund checks (late) and cash any checks still mailed in by rubes. I stopped paying federal taxes and filing federal income tax returns after the 2020 election and have no intention of ever resuming.
Medicaid renewal forms are at least three months late in my state (I have no idea how late they will be when/if they finally arrive but a friend is keeping me informed). A friend who just visited his parents in Bulgaria had a passport emergency and found there is no longer a staffed U.S. Embassy there. Only DC could deal with his problem and it took 8 weeks. I don't think we have a government anymore. I think we have a skeleton crew and a Big Show.
We need to pick an alternate currency to escape their control and operate our parallel government and economy.
Whatever their delusions of perfect control are, they won't survive the dieoff. Pew & Kaiser say 73% of Americans took the shots and they are heavily grouped in certain demographics, like Big Tech employees. None of their fantasy control systems will be installed or maintained. A few rocks will take care of anything already installed.
As far as I'm concerned, they attacked us with a deadly bioweapon and we are free to physically counterattack wherever we see them.
Toby Rogers Wrote: We need to keep building the medical freedom economy
Reply:
I was and am a member of the medical freedom movement since 1970 (https://thenhf.com/codex/). I choose movement because it was about growing your freedom in your own back yard garden. The Grange still had some guts.
_________
But then Ag Secretary Earl Butz (Nixon Administration) said "Get Big or Get Out" to small farmers. Took what subsidies small farmers had from the Roosevelt era New Deal and gave that to corporate farmers. Small farmers from back yard to back 40 ac. are a rare species indeed.
So we find ourselves in a desperate situation. Consider this, there are various forms of siege, some Toby Rogers mentioned. Siege in those cases is to isolate a person from belonging. The real siege is when they prevent for whatever reason what little ability one has to buy safe and effective supplements (vitamins and minerals). The control the food system is now corporate and siege can be enforced at anytime. Here is a bit about Amos Miller to give you and idea of what we, those of us who live a healthy life are facing.
Once you start you can find a good deal more on this. For me the most important fact of Amos Millers farm is being farmed continuously for generations. It is thriving. It is small and people can check it out. Corporate farms are guarded you cannot visually inspect. If you do some how inspect you will be horrified.
_________
A medical freedom economy can only happen when small farmers are encouraged by federal and state law. Sadly I see no way they can compete within the legislative arena. Small farmers cannot raise the money to pay for that kind of lobbing. If they could they wouldn't be small farmers
The best defense is a good offense -- i.e., counterattack against what the sociopaths most care about: poisoning us with all their vaccines and their precious viral-contagion theory to "justify" medical tyranny. So, we should (a) keep exposing the virus hoax, and (b) refuse all vaccines for ourselves and our children.
The social matrix or society conditions us to seek security and esteem by following its 'should' mandates. People will do anything to avoid feeling shamed, and an insecure ego will work to fulfill the 'shoulds' in order to feel a sense of belonging. Yes, Pharma exploits these weaknesses easily. Stepping out of these conditioned traps is no easy task. It starts young, as we can see with the childhood vaccine program. Notice how many who did not want the mRNA jab quickly defended themselves with a follow-up statement of how they were in general pro-vaccine. Why are they pro-vaccine? Most likely because they have a very shallow education on the subject. It is like being drawn to the charm of a certain politician and voting them in without really have any clue of how detrimental they may be once in power.
"I’m still chewing on this point though — is Pharma right in their cynical view of human nature? Or has Pharma just figured out one particular set of buttons."
Toby, I have to tell you that Pharma (and all the domination-minded political actors through history) do have it "right" about human submissiveness...it is how we evolved biologically to created complex societies. What is new is the neuroscience to expedite the totalitarian dream of every domination-minded despot from Atila to Bill Gates. You absolutely need to "chew" on my book. Here's is the synopsis.
Regards,
CC Lum
Synopsis
BioPlatonism: Is It Too Late to Stop the Human Extinction Trajectory?
Neuro-biologically speaking, Aristotle’s political animal has evolved as an interaction among three distinct cerebral networks. In the case of mankind, as well as a range of other species, we have come to associate the workings of these three neuro networks with the behavioural expressions of a will-to-dominate, a will(ingness)-to-submit and, lastly, a will-to-help&give. These archetypical political personalities then are quite familiar to us as the self-interested power seeker, the ever-compliant subject and the selfless altruist. Political life, past and present, has overwhelmingly been shaped by the interactive dynamics of the first two sets of this neurological wiring, with rare (but inspiring) behavioural manifestations of the will-to-help&give.
Advances in neuroscience and nanotechnology have given us an empirical foundation for understanding this will-to-help&give as the neurobiology of morality, thus solving one of the oldest questions of philosophy… what is morality? But plugging this old hole in philosophy is the least of the benefits to be had from this neurobiological breakthrough. With our rapidly expanding understanding of the biological wellspring and neural flow of morality we (as a species) are on the immediate frontier of being able to fundamentally alter and manage the three politically salient neuro networks driving political behaviour and all human social life, redirecting our evolutionary trajectory away from self-inflicted extinction and toward social sustainability at all levels. Let me hasten to say that the track of this transformation doesn’t need to be about a genetic makeover of the human brain (though that is very much the prescribed course of those presently occupying the hegemonic high-ground). Rather it is about using the nano-technological “insights” (e.g., MRI, et.al technologies) of neuroscience to inform the restructuring of political systems around designs that screen for morally intelligent (common-good serving) leadership and screen against (self-serving) hegemonic personalities.
There is much talk these days of a “Great Reset” for humanity to finally make our species sustainable. As it stands, that reset is in the hands of the same hegemonic political psychologies that have dominated human social (dis)order from the Stone Age to the Nuclear Age. Clearly humanity first needs a fundamental reset of political design, opening paths for morally intelligent leadership. Tragically, neuroscience is presently (and rapidly!!) being weaponized for the final subjugation of the humankind by the same will-to-dominate forces that reduced the rest of the animal world to states of being known as livestock… or game-to-hunt…or just natural curiosities to entertain us or ignore (until they get in the path of the domination-minded humans). But within the same neuroscience there is the opportunity to develop human-serving, rather than human-subjugating, political designs.
The aim of BioPlatonism is to provide an evolutionary narrative of politics as a unifying focal point for practical political action/strategy…AND to lay the theoretical foundations for a truly scientific paradigm of politics, which is integral-consilient with the natural sciences (firstly, evolutionary biology-psychology) and informed by the timeless aspirations of the humanities.
To read the full text go to https://cclum.net. Please forward this synopsis to your email lists and cross-post on your blog site, social media networks or Internet forums.
Oct 15, 2022·edited Oct 15, 2022Liked by Toby Rogers
Toby,
Fantastic article thank you.
Although I am typically against membership display ie Lance Armstrong bracelets ( hoax), solidarity signaling, in this case of life or dead ( who would have thought!) I think it would really help. A Brit on a blog said in the UK people wear a white shield 🛡 to promote medical freedom and welcome conversation among those of similar thinking. Do u think this is a good idea? How can we get this started? I am obviously not a social media person
I live in an area where the radio etc. is still pushing the shots like they are nothing and people are still walking in to get them and allowing their new borns and children to get them. I believe half of them just don't know the dangers because they haven't heard and they think others are still getting them. The schools are a big problem. Soros bought the Teachers Union and Medical assoc. as you know. Thanks
Oct 15, 2022·edited Oct 15, 2022Liked by Toby Rogers
Australian Assoc. Professor Peter Parry (child & adolescent psychiatrist at University of QLD) recently finished some research on how pharma psychologically profiles doctors to influence prescribing behaviours. He spoke about this at a recent gathering, it sounds fascinating. I am not sure if it's published yet though. From memory, he accessed some internal pharma documents which instructed sales reps to identify and avoid the "Conservatives"( around 10% of the medical population who prefer to stick to the tried and true and are skeptical of anything novel) ; target the ambitious doctors who will accept inducements to boost their career in exchange for endorsing the product (another 10%) ; and then target the "rule followers" (the approx 10% who will follow a rule even when the rule is very clearly invalid) by showing them what the ambitious doctors are doing, who they will then start following. Pharma counts on the 2nd and 3rd groups together being loud and visible enough to sway the rest of the cohort. This implies that if the majority of doctors (who don't fall into one of these 3 categories), were simply aware of the extent of shenanigans going on in groups 2 and 3, they would be more likely to approach their "thought-leaders"more critically. It also implies that if the first group could only get louder and more visible they may be able to some day drown out the other 2.
I’ve always thought pharma ads were cheesy and dumb, but as per usual, you raise a good point. I was scrolling through Facebook 😬 and came across the most ridiculous Pfizer ad. A cute little character “mRNA” is going to therapy because he’s depressed. Depressed that crunchy people like me don’t realize he’s “completely natural” and we shouldn’t discriminate or be afraid of him. I got a good laugh out of it, but actually if one were going to try and create an ad to convince me that I needed to get jabbed, they did have me pegged… That is actually really frightening.
Still to answer your question “has Pharma just figured out one particular set of buttons — but a more principled/ethical movement such as ours could appeal to a different set of values/instincts/tendencies and generate much better outcomes for society?” I think yes, they’ve overplayed their hand. Walensky is getting slaughtered on Twitter in her comment sections. There’s been a pretty strong reaction to Pfizer admitting they did not know if the vaccine would prevent transmission before bringing it to market.
I think people are hungry for truth, transparency and honesty. I’m not great at reaching the masses, but I’m good at one-on-one conversations, and those have been going very well lately. I’m encouraged.
Thank you for your heart and perspective. You have a way of getting me to shift my thinking.
THCV to the rescue? Can you use these techniques to market it?
How does the cartel send exactly the right message at exactly the right time to get you to take that deadly shot? While I didn't fall for it, 17 months ago I got that message while walking the dog at the park. Dunno how, though my cell phone was in my back pocket. It said I'd just get saline, and would then get a vax pass. Edward Bernays and Vannevar Bush must have been on the same team!
Can THC/weed (and NPR) be depopularized?
I find myself partly agreeing with the first half of your essay and agreeing 100% with the latter half. the 2020 election was stolen - full stop. I've done as much, if not more research on election integrity and all the evidence is out there - but you have to look of course. All the same tactics deployed to the naysayers of the vax were deployed against those who investigated election integrity. Therefore, while they do have immense personal data on all of us - they still needed multiple, coordinated efforts to rig either the voter, the machine, or the ballot processing - or a combination of all three to pull it off. As for social media and big tech. I engage as little as I can get away with. No FB, IG, Twitter, TikTok. No Google. Use Brave, DuckDuckGo (though need an alternative to them, just been lazy). My kids will not own a cell phone - and according to my daughter she's the only one in her class still without one. I don't care! They have control only if we give it to them and allow it. I often wonder what would happen if we all just quit social media one day - like everyone ditched their FB, Twitter and IG accounts all at once. A true walk-away campaign. It's not difficult! Then what would they do??
Scientists tell me 100% of the people who took the shots will be dead within three years, with the peak of the dieoff in the winter of '23-'24. The autoimmunity is inexorable and deaths will come from organ failures, including heart failure, and cancers (the surge in which is already a 9-sigma event).
So people who remain are going to be strong medical freedom people.
It's so clear to me that the 2022 midterms are being rigged that I see no point in engaging in the fake elections at all. I refuse to choose between the governor who banned early treatment for Covid in my state and the military intelligence plant who just staged a fake mass stabbing on the Las Vegas Strip.
I think we have to turn our backs on this government and these corporations and create parallel government and economic structures, the sooner the better. The IRS threw out 30 million W-2s and 1099s in 2021. They aren't even bothering to process returns except to send refund checks (late) and cash any checks still mailed in by rubes. I stopped paying federal taxes and filing federal income tax returns after the 2020 election and have no intention of ever resuming.
Medicaid renewal forms are at least three months late in my state (I have no idea how late they will be when/if they finally arrive but a friend is keeping me informed). A friend who just visited his parents in Bulgaria had a passport emergency and found there is no longer a staffed U.S. Embassy there. Only DC could deal with his problem and it took 8 weeks. I don't think we have a government anymore. I think we have a skeleton crew and a Big Show.
We need to pick an alternate currency to escape their control and operate our parallel government and economy.
Whatever their delusions of perfect control are, they won't survive the dieoff. Pew & Kaiser say 73% of Americans took the shots and they are heavily grouped in certain demographics, like Big Tech employees. None of their fantasy control systems will be installed or maintained. A few rocks will take care of anything already installed.
As far as I'm concerned, they attacked us with a deadly bioweapon and we are free to physically counterattack wherever we see them.
The most human thing I do- print out slips of paper with email contact for a no-jab friends group, and drop them in tip jars.
Toby Rogers Wrote: We need to keep building the medical freedom economy
Reply:
I was and am a member of the medical freedom movement since 1970 (https://thenhf.com/codex/). I choose movement because it was about growing your freedom in your own back yard garden. The Grange still had some guts.
_________
But then Ag Secretary Earl Butz (Nixon Administration) said "Get Big or Get Out" to small farmers. Took what subsidies small farmers had from the Roosevelt era New Deal and gave that to corporate farmers. Small farmers from back yard to back 40 ac. are a rare species indeed.
So we find ourselves in a desperate situation. Consider this, there are various forms of siege, some Toby Rogers mentioned. Siege in those cases is to isolate a person from belonging. The real siege is when they prevent for whatever reason what little ability one has to buy safe and effective supplements (vitamins and minerals). The control the food system is now corporate and siege can be enforced at anytime. Here is a bit about Amos Miller to give you and idea of what we, those of us who live a healthy life are facing.
https://harmonyfarms.blog/hard-facts-on-the-amos-miller-case-miller-organic-farm/
https://healinglaw.com/blog/what-the-case-of-amos-miller-vs-us-can-show-us-about-law-and-government/
Once you start you can find a good deal more on this. For me the most important fact of Amos Millers farm is being farmed continuously for generations. It is thriving. It is small and people can check it out. Corporate farms are guarded you cannot visually inspect. If you do some how inspect you will be horrified.
_________
A medical freedom economy can only happen when small farmers are encouraged by federal and state law. Sadly I see no way they can compete within the legislative arena. Small farmers cannot raise the money to pay for that kind of lobbing. If they could they wouldn't be small farmers
The best defense is a good offense -- i.e., counterattack against what the sociopaths most care about: poisoning us with all their vaccines and their precious viral-contagion theory to "justify" medical tyranny. So, we should (a) keep exposing the virus hoax, and (b) refuse all vaccines for ourselves and our children.
Brilliant analysis! Thank you. This article on so-called mass formation is relevant :
https://www.globalresearch.ca/mass-formation-not-even-wrong/5796245
Can our movement use billboards, signs held on overpasses, messages written on our car rear windows, bumper stickers? Messages like:
“Covid boosters kill!” With a website.
Or “Digital ID + Digital $ = Digital Prison”. This would help educate people and also show like mindeds they are not alone. Thoughts?
The social matrix or society conditions us to seek security and esteem by following its 'should' mandates. People will do anything to avoid feeling shamed, and an insecure ego will work to fulfill the 'shoulds' in order to feel a sense of belonging. Yes, Pharma exploits these weaknesses easily. Stepping out of these conditioned traps is no easy task. It starts young, as we can see with the childhood vaccine program. Notice how many who did not want the mRNA jab quickly defended themselves with a follow-up statement of how they were in general pro-vaccine. Why are they pro-vaccine? Most likely because they have a very shallow education on the subject. It is like being drawn to the charm of a certain politician and voting them in without really have any clue of how detrimental they may be once in power.
"I’m still chewing on this point though — is Pharma right in their cynical view of human nature? Or has Pharma just figured out one particular set of buttons."
Toby, I have to tell you that Pharma (and all the domination-minded political actors through history) do have it "right" about human submissiveness...it is how we evolved biologically to created complex societies. What is new is the neuroscience to expedite the totalitarian dream of every domination-minded despot from Atila to Bill Gates. You absolutely need to "chew" on my book. Here's is the synopsis.
Regards,
CC Lum
Synopsis
BioPlatonism: Is It Too Late to Stop the Human Extinction Trajectory?
Neuro-biologically speaking, Aristotle’s political animal has evolved as an interaction among three distinct cerebral networks. In the case of mankind, as well as a range of other species, we have come to associate the workings of these three neuro networks with the behavioural expressions of a will-to-dominate, a will(ingness)-to-submit and, lastly, a will-to-help&give. These archetypical political personalities then are quite familiar to us as the self-interested power seeker, the ever-compliant subject and the selfless altruist. Political life, past and present, has overwhelmingly been shaped by the interactive dynamics of the first two sets of this neurological wiring, with rare (but inspiring) behavioural manifestations of the will-to-help&give.
Advances in neuroscience and nanotechnology have given us an empirical foundation for understanding this will-to-help&give as the neurobiology of morality, thus solving one of the oldest questions of philosophy… what is morality? But plugging this old hole in philosophy is the least of the benefits to be had from this neurobiological breakthrough. With our rapidly expanding understanding of the biological wellspring and neural flow of morality we (as a species) are on the immediate frontier of being able to fundamentally alter and manage the three politically salient neuro networks driving political behaviour and all human social life, redirecting our evolutionary trajectory away from self-inflicted extinction and toward social sustainability at all levels. Let me hasten to say that the track of this transformation doesn’t need to be about a genetic makeover of the human brain (though that is very much the prescribed course of those presently occupying the hegemonic high-ground). Rather it is about using the nano-technological “insights” (e.g., MRI, et.al technologies) of neuroscience to inform the restructuring of political systems around designs that screen for morally intelligent (common-good serving) leadership and screen against (self-serving) hegemonic personalities.
There is much talk these days of a “Great Reset” for humanity to finally make our species sustainable. As it stands, that reset is in the hands of the same hegemonic political psychologies that have dominated human social (dis)order from the Stone Age to the Nuclear Age. Clearly humanity first needs a fundamental reset of political design, opening paths for morally intelligent leadership. Tragically, neuroscience is presently (and rapidly!!) being weaponized for the final subjugation of the humankind by the same will-to-dominate forces that reduced the rest of the animal world to states of being known as livestock… or game-to-hunt…or just natural curiosities to entertain us or ignore (until they get in the path of the domination-minded humans). But within the same neuroscience there is the opportunity to develop human-serving, rather than human-subjugating, political designs.
The aim of BioPlatonism is to provide an evolutionary narrative of politics as a unifying focal point for practical political action/strategy…AND to lay the theoretical foundations for a truly scientific paradigm of politics, which is integral-consilient with the natural sciences (firstly, evolutionary biology-psychology) and informed by the timeless aspirations of the humanities.
To read the full text go to https://cclum.net. Please forward this synopsis to your email lists and cross-post on your blog site, social media networks or Internet forums.
Toby,
Fantastic article thank you.
Although I am typically against membership display ie Lance Armstrong bracelets ( hoax), solidarity signaling, in this case of life or dead ( who would have thought!) I think it would really help. A Brit on a blog said in the UK people wear a white shield 🛡 to promote medical freedom and welcome conversation among those of similar thinking. Do u think this is a good idea? How can we get this started? I am obviously not a social media person
I live in an area where the radio etc. is still pushing the shots like they are nothing and people are still walking in to get them and allowing their new borns and children to get them. I believe half of them just don't know the dangers because they haven't heard and they think others are still getting them. The schools are a big problem. Soros bought the Teachers Union and Medical assoc. as you know. Thanks
After seeing what the elite did to Bernie in both 2016 and 2020, I have zero hope that 2024 can bring change.
Australian Assoc. Professor Peter Parry (child & adolescent psychiatrist at University of QLD) recently finished some research on how pharma psychologically profiles doctors to influence prescribing behaviours. He spoke about this at a recent gathering, it sounds fascinating. I am not sure if it's published yet though. From memory, he accessed some internal pharma documents which instructed sales reps to identify and avoid the "Conservatives"( around 10% of the medical population who prefer to stick to the tried and true and are skeptical of anything novel) ; target the ambitious doctors who will accept inducements to boost their career in exchange for endorsing the product (another 10%) ; and then target the "rule followers" (the approx 10% who will follow a rule even when the rule is very clearly invalid) by showing them what the ambitious doctors are doing, who they will then start following. Pharma counts on the 2nd and 3rd groups together being loud and visible enough to sway the rest of the cohort. This implies that if the majority of doctors (who don't fall into one of these 3 categories), were simply aware of the extent of shenanigans going on in groups 2 and 3, they would be more likely to approach their "thought-leaders"more critically. It also implies that if the first group could only get louder and more visible they may be able to some day drown out the other 2.
Yes. Cultural secession. All awake people to continue exiting from society. We need to build our own societies with our own institutions.
I’ve always thought pharma ads were cheesy and dumb, but as per usual, you raise a good point. I was scrolling through Facebook 😬 and came across the most ridiculous Pfizer ad. A cute little character “mRNA” is going to therapy because he’s depressed. Depressed that crunchy people like me don’t realize he’s “completely natural” and we shouldn’t discriminate or be afraid of him. I got a good laugh out of it, but actually if one were going to try and create an ad to convince me that I needed to get jabbed, they did have me pegged… That is actually really frightening.
Still to answer your question “has Pharma just figured out one particular set of buttons — but a more principled/ethical movement such as ours could appeal to a different set of values/instincts/tendencies and generate much better outcomes for society?” I think yes, they’ve overplayed their hand. Walensky is getting slaughtered on Twitter in her comment sections. There’s been a pretty strong reaction to Pfizer admitting they did not know if the vaccine would prevent transmission before bringing it to market.
I think people are hungry for truth, transparency and honesty. I’m not great at reaching the masses, but I’m good at one-on-one conversations, and those have been going very well lately. I’m encouraged.
Thank you for your heart and perspective. You have a way of getting me to shift my thinking.