VAERS(Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) Data Indicates the Covid Vaccines Have Killed At Least 140,000 Americans as of 12092021. This means that the bureaucrat and political mandaters are guilty of committing 140,000 negligent homicides. These bureaucrat and political mandaters should actually be charge with at least 2nd degree murder for 140,000 homicides.
I think they should be charged with deliberately causing harm or predetermined mass murder. After all, they do want to control human population numbers, and vaccines are one way of achieving that goal.
Do we have any research showing how the reporting changed since 2010? Does anyone know how the severity of a side effect influences the percentage that are reported?
Toby, has anyone compiled data comparing number of injuries per dose or per patient, of this shot when compared to others? Isn't this important to give context to the great number of injuries reported? Thanks for your thoughts
Fair point. I have not seen that. But it's certainly doable. The most toxic vaccine up until now was HPV with a 5 to 7% serious adverse event rate. Coronavirus vaccines are coming in closer to 15% after 2 doses and I think we'll see 20% after the 3rd dose. But you're right, there are far more doses of coronavirus vaccine being administered so it magnifies the harms beyond the per capita rate.
Ps, just thinking of Dr Charles Hoffe's data which showed 62% of "non-injured" actually had microclots. Adding maybe 15-20% with obvious injury is horrifying.
Considering the increased attention, to put it mildly, given to vaccination and VAERS, would it be reasonable to posit that cov19 events might be less underepprted? Just saying this is worth looking into, though I am certain some percentage of incidents are not reported or even downplayed in severity.
Curious if disparate hospital groups are subject to FOI demands to see their report records? I would love to see Kaiser’s VARES reports for instance.
I have suspected that large health care organizations like national hospital chains are the reason only five percent of the batches contain about 100 percent of the AE reports, as opposed to “bad lots”.
Thank-you for the OpenVAERS link. It lead me to another substack that I just subscribed to. Margaret Anna. Beautiful research and links. Thank-you again! I'm enjoying all my substack subscriptions immensely! 🤗
Just to get it to fit on the chart. The association is what's important. Number of injuries are proportional to number of people vaccinated in the state.
Thanks for the links to the information about the sources of VAERS reports; that's useful. However, all I get from the by-state graph is that there are more vaccinations and injury reports in states with larger populations. No surprise there.
You can thank the immunity vaccine manufacturers enjoy from prosecution since 1986 when Congress passed a law exempting them from legal liability for serious adverse reactions caused by vaccination. The COVID-19 EUAs gives them additional protections from lawful recourse, too.
This new state-by-state chart has a powerful visual impact, but... The problem is that it could be interpreted as "injuries are proportional to population, so they are just background, not related to the vaccine". It would make a stronger statistical case if it showed reported injury rates as proportional to vaccination rates.
I agree. What I get from the state-by-state chart is: "In states with larger populations, there are more vaccinations, and more reported injuries." There's nothing at all "extraordinary" about that.
A friend with an autoimmune disorder got shingles in the eye a few months after 3rd covid shot by Pfizer. What is a known reaction to Pfizer for people with auto immune disorders? Shingles! Apparently it’s not an uncommon reaction to vaccines in general. Is it connected? I don’t know. Was it reported or did the doctor make a connection? No and no!
On their website the CDC specifically says that the vaccines were not tested on those with autoimmune disorders. But as I recall, the next sentence says that those people should still be vaccinated. That is of course insane.
In autoimmune disorders the immune system is "overactive" in that it produces an inflammatory reaction to normal tissues. This can cause everything from rheumatoid arthritis to severe uveitis (eye inflammation causing blindness). Introducing the spike protein manufacturing mechanism into cells via the mRNA vaccines in particular, will likely cause severe inflammatory reactions in those with such conditions (and there are several). Conversely, those with autoimmune disease who are on drugs that suppress the immune system, could have the opposite effect, where the immune system will not develop the desired immune response to the circulating spike protein as it causes problems such as micro blood clots (and studies show it does not stay in the vaccination region of the deltoid muscle as was initially claimed).
The long-delayed Novavax vaccine (protein subunit type with immune boster) is the least likely of the available vaccines to cause side effects because it does not enter the cells. However, it is becoming apparent from research that all the vaccines that only address the spike protein are in fact inferior to natural-gained immunity that produces an immune response to the half-dozen or so proteins in the virus. A traditional inactived Covid virus vaccine would be a superior "sterilizing vaccine," preventing both severe disease as well as transmission - such as is claimed for the Chinese Sinovac and Sinopharm vaccines. But no rational person would trust a CCP produced vaccine at this point. The real question in this regard is why are the Pfizer, Moderna, et al. not working on such a vaccine?
And of course why is there the ridiculous effort on the part of the goverment to discourage doctors from using any medications they wish - e.g. inexpensive ivermectin. Doctors are even being threatened with discipline by medical boards or fired from their jobs for doing so. But (surprise!) Pfizer and Merck now are producing a very expensive drug that acts similarly to ivermectin, and of course those meds are acceptable to the government. This is the first time such a thing has happened in U.S. medical practice. Of course Lysenkoism such as this has happened in communist countries many times.
Time for a national divorce before it comes to blows. Free States of America and Socialist States of America.
I did some checking and discovered that the constantly changing CDC Covid-19 website has changed their statements twice from the original about the vaccines and autoimmune disease, where it was initially under the page titled "COVID-19 Vaccines for People with Underlying Medical Conditions."
As I wrote, the previous statement archived from a few months ago (Aug. 19, 2021) states:
"People with autoimmune conditions may receive a COVID-19 vaccine. However, they should be aware that NO DATA [emphasis mine] are currently available on the safety of COVID-19 vaccines for people with autoimmune conditions. People from this group WERE ELIGIBLE for enrollment in SOME of the clinical trials [emphasis mine]. More information about vaccine clinical trials can be found below."
However in the next archived pdf version (dated Sept. 27, 2021) the second sentence disappeared, and a brand new sentence appeared: "Results from these clinical trials showed that safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in people with autoimmune conditions were similar to the general population." So did the data magically appear?
Now the information has been transferred to a new page (updated November 19, 2021) where it says:
"People with autoimmune conditions WERE ENROLLED [emphasis mine] in COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials. Safety and efficacy of vaccines in this population were similar to the general population." And now a new sentence appears: "If people with these conditions are immunocompromised because of medications such as high-dose corticosteroids or biologic agents, they should consult [link] 'Considerations for COVID-19 vaccination in moderately or severely immunocompromised people.' "
So it went from "NO DATA" in the vaccine trials for people with autoimmune disease, where they didn't seem to know if people with autoimmune disease were enrolled , to they somehow identified those people after the fact and were then able to state ". . . safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in people with autoimmune conditions were similar to the general population."
And then finally to an added link with a warning stating that those with autoimmune disease taking immunosuppresants should be vaccinated, as well as having the boosters because, "Moderately or severely immunocompromised people may not mount a protective immune response after initial vaccination and, furthermore, their protection by primary vaccination may wane over time making them susceptible to severe COVID-19." So again it went from "NO DATA," to the vaccines effectiveness being the same as for the "general population," to now a severe warning about the vaccines being LESS effective in those with autoimmune disease who are taking immunosuppressants. And people wonder why we are skeptical.
Check out Dr. Nathan Thompson’s analysis of a patient’s pre-and post-vaxx (#1 and #2) bloodwork to see the progressive devastation to the immune system (he describes it as *creating* autoimmunity): https://www.brighteon.com/d0b119e8-6c42-4bc3-9e32-d6d37b1ff769
Yeah people are wondering if they perhaps got an especially bad batch. This is exactly the sort of signal that the CDC should follow up on but does not because they work for the cartel.
Are the reporting sources for this vaccine consistent with prior vaccines? I guess I am surprised that vaccine manufacturers would be honest enough to report in 2021.
VAERS(Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) Data Indicates the Covid Vaccines Have Killed At Least 140,000 Americans as of 12092021. This means that the bureaucrat and political mandaters are guilty of committing 140,000 negligent homicides. These bureaucrat and political mandaters should actually be charge with at least 2nd degree murder for 140,000 homicides.
I think they should be charged with deliberately causing harm or predetermined mass murder. After all, they do want to control human population numbers, and vaccines are one way of achieving that goal.
Do we have any research showing how the reporting changed since 2010? Does anyone know how the severity of a side effect influences the percentage that are reported?
If open to a short parody on our current poor regulation environment. JP sears is linked here. “I love that candy science” It’s pretty funny.
😂
https://youtu.be/Czu11HmhfAY
Toby, has anyone compiled data comparing number of injuries per dose or per patient, of this shot when compared to others? Isn't this important to give context to the great number of injuries reported? Thanks for your thoughts
Fair point. I have not seen that. But it's certainly doable. The most toxic vaccine up until now was HPV with a 5 to 7% serious adverse event rate. Coronavirus vaccines are coming in closer to 15% after 2 doses and I think we'll see 20% after the 3rd dose. But you're right, there are far more doses of coronavirus vaccine being administered so it magnifies the harms beyond the per capita rate.
Ps, just thinking of Dr Charles Hoffe's data which showed 62% of "non-injured" actually had microclots. Adding maybe 15-20% with obvious injury is horrifying.
Wow, shocking stats!! This would be a great research project for someone who knows what they are doing with these numbers. Thanks for replying.
Considering the increased attention, to put it mildly, given to vaccination and VAERS, would it be reasonable to posit that cov19 events might be less underepprted? Just saying this is worth looking into, though I am certain some percentage of incidents are not reported or even downplayed in severity.
Perhaps. But that's offset by the massive pressure on doctors and nurses not to report.
Curious if disparate hospital groups are subject to FOI demands to see their report records? I would love to see Kaiser’s VARES reports for instance.
I have suspected that large health care organizations like national hospital chains are the reason only five percent of the batches contain about 100 percent of the AE reports, as opposed to “bad lots”.
Certainly we should know this information.
Thank-you for the OpenVAERS link. It lead me to another substack that I just subscribed to. Margaret Anna. Beautiful research and links. Thank-you again! I'm enjoying all my substack subscriptions immensely! 🤗
Question from a dummy, but what is the rationale of dividing by 1,000?
Just to get it to fit on the chart. The association is what's important. Number of injuries are proportional to number of people vaccinated in the state.
Yes, that's called data manipulation. it makes it easier to fit "bias hypothesis"
Thanks for the links to the information about the sources of VAERS reports; that's useful. However, all I get from the by-state graph is that there are more vaccinations and injury reports in states with larger populations. No surprise there.
The FDA/CDC has issued a huge recall off onions. 892 'illnesses' linked to the onions. If only the jabs were held to the same standard as onions.
You can thank the immunity vaccine manufacturers enjoy from prosecution since 1986 when Congress passed a law exempting them from legal liability for serious adverse reactions caused by vaccination. The COVID-19 EUAs gives them additional protections from lawful recourse, too.
I just saw a recall notice at Costco for a stepstool that had caused 2 injuries.
This new state-by-state chart has a powerful visual impact, but... The problem is that it could be interpreted as "injuries are proportional to population, so they are just background, not related to the vaccine". It would make a stronger statistical case if it showed reported injury rates as proportional to vaccination rates.
I agree. What I get from the state-by-state chart is: "In states with larger populations, there are more vaccinations, and more reported injuries." There's nothing at all "extraordinary" about that.
A friend with an autoimmune disorder got shingles in the eye a few months after 3rd covid shot by Pfizer. What is a known reaction to Pfizer for people with auto immune disorders? Shingles! Apparently it’s not an uncommon reaction to vaccines in general. Is it connected? I don’t know. Was it reported or did the doctor make a connection? No and no!
On their website the CDC specifically says that the vaccines were not tested on those with autoimmune disorders. But as I recall, the next sentence says that those people should still be vaccinated. That is of course insane.
In autoimmune disorders the immune system is "overactive" in that it produces an inflammatory reaction to normal tissues. This can cause everything from rheumatoid arthritis to severe uveitis (eye inflammation causing blindness). Introducing the spike protein manufacturing mechanism into cells via the mRNA vaccines in particular, will likely cause severe inflammatory reactions in those with such conditions (and there are several). Conversely, those with autoimmune disease who are on drugs that suppress the immune system, could have the opposite effect, where the immune system will not develop the desired immune response to the circulating spike protein as it causes problems such as micro blood clots (and studies show it does not stay in the vaccination region of the deltoid muscle as was initially claimed).
The long-delayed Novavax vaccine (protein subunit type with immune boster) is the least likely of the available vaccines to cause side effects because it does not enter the cells. However, it is becoming apparent from research that all the vaccines that only address the spike protein are in fact inferior to natural-gained immunity that produces an immune response to the half-dozen or so proteins in the virus. A traditional inactived Covid virus vaccine would be a superior "sterilizing vaccine," preventing both severe disease as well as transmission - such as is claimed for the Chinese Sinovac and Sinopharm vaccines. But no rational person would trust a CCP produced vaccine at this point. The real question in this regard is why are the Pfizer, Moderna, et al. not working on such a vaccine?
And of course why is there the ridiculous effort on the part of the goverment to discourage doctors from using any medications they wish - e.g. inexpensive ivermectin. Doctors are even being threatened with discipline by medical boards or fired from their jobs for doing so. But (surprise!) Pfizer and Merck now are producing a very expensive drug that acts similarly to ivermectin, and of course those meds are acceptable to the government. This is the first time such a thing has happened in U.S. medical practice. Of course Lysenkoism such as this has happened in communist countries many times.
Time for a national divorce before it comes to blows. Free States of America and Socialist States of America.
I did some checking and discovered that the constantly changing CDC Covid-19 website has changed their statements twice from the original about the vaccines and autoimmune disease, where it was initially under the page titled "COVID-19 Vaccines for People with Underlying Medical Conditions."
As I wrote, the previous statement archived from a few months ago (Aug. 19, 2021) states:
"People with autoimmune conditions may receive a COVID-19 vaccine. However, they should be aware that NO DATA [emphasis mine] are currently available on the safety of COVID-19 vaccines for people with autoimmune conditions. People from this group WERE ELIGIBLE for enrollment in SOME of the clinical trials [emphasis mine]. More information about vaccine clinical trials can be found below."
Source:
https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/109019
However in the next archived pdf version (dated Sept. 27, 2021) the second sentence disappeared, and a brand new sentence appeared: "Results from these clinical trials showed that safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in people with autoimmune conditions were similar to the general population." So did the data magically appear?
Source:
https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/110088
Now the information has been transferred to a new page (updated November 19, 2021) where it says:
"People with autoimmune conditions WERE ENROLLED [emphasis mine] in COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials. Safety and efficacy of vaccines in this population were similar to the general population." And now a new sentence appears: "If people with these conditions are immunocompromised because of medications such as high-dose corticosteroids or biologic agents, they should consult [link] 'Considerations for COVID-19 vaccination in moderately or severely immunocompromised people.' "
Source:
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/clinical-considerations/covid-19-vaccines-us.html
So it went from "NO DATA" in the vaccine trials for people with autoimmune disease, where they didn't seem to know if people with autoimmune disease were enrolled , to they somehow identified those people after the fact and were then able to state ". . . safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in people with autoimmune conditions were similar to the general population."
And then finally to an added link with a warning stating that those with autoimmune disease taking immunosuppresants should be vaccinated, as well as having the boosters because, "Moderately or severely immunocompromised people may not mount a protective immune response after initial vaccination and, furthermore, their protection by primary vaccination may wane over time making them susceptible to severe COVID-19." So again it went from "NO DATA," to the vaccines effectiveness being the same as for the "general population," to now a severe warning about the vaccines being LESS effective in those with autoimmune disease who are taking immunosuppressants. And people wonder why we are skeptical.
Maybe they just simply completed the study.
Check out Dr. Nathan Thompson’s analysis of a patient’s pre-and post-vaxx (#1 and #2) bloodwork to see the progressive devastation to the immune system (he describes it as *creating* autoimmunity): https://www.brighteon.com/d0b119e8-6c42-4bc3-9e32-d6d37b1ff769
Punish Floridians
Appreciate what openvaers.com has done for sure. However, I believe something like this shows more clearly which states have the highest incidence of harm per vaxxed capita: https://vaersanalysis.info/2021/11/05/deaths-and-adverse-events-per-state-per-million-vaccinated-persons-for-covid-19-vaccines/
Great link! Thank you!!!
too bad don't have which shots in each of these states. I.e, have any states predominately used Moderna over Pfizer V Jansen etc. Thank you for this!
Wow Indiana?!
Yeah people are wondering if they perhaps got an especially bad batch. This is exactly the sort of signal that the CDC should follow up on but does not because they work for the cartel.
Are the reporting sources for this vaccine consistent with prior vaccines? I guess I am surprised that vaccine manufacturers would be honest enough to report in 2021.