Great overview of enclosures. Should have only mentioned France after WWII with the forced destruction of family farms and creation of mega-farms for the monoculture agriculture. Collectivization en Français.
The DNA bits that we were told were contaminations , were NOT contaminations .They were the very purpose of those injections , to make our bodies produce the toxins that will make us have hte designed diseases cancer , cancer of the blood , Multiple Sclerosis , Alzheimers , Parkinson's , etc
The heart attacks were not supposed to happen .Something went wrong there.They make no money when I die of a heart attack.They make a lot of money if I fall sick , chronically sick ,....Then you understand why the Big Pharma companies are selling their "regular" medicine divisions , and BUYING for large sums of money the companies with the expensive cures that will be needed soon by many people... and these technologies are expensive , so they will charge a lot of money to keep you alive , and dependent.
So they are building the infrastructures , because they know it is coming....
The most stupendous buy ? See Polyplus.....unbelievable !
They have the technology to make US GMO ( Genetically Modified Organisms ).So they did it , and nobody understood it !
"Agriculture does not generate much wealth. A subsistence farmer using the power of his/her own body can generate about $4,000 (in today’s dollars) of economic activity per year."
"Collective agriculture in the Soviet Union, China, and Vietnam accomplished the same goal. Under collective agriculture, land, livestock, and farm equipment were seized by the state in the name of increasing crop yields. In the process, crop yields decreased (for a decade or more), people starved, and many of those who survived migrated to the cities where they were put to work in factories."
Very interesting point of view, however what has made agriculture profitable was mechanisation and hydrocarbon fuels aka fossil fuel. The old steam driven tractors were cumbersome and heavy and modern fuel driven tractors and harvesters are far more efficient. That has essentially reduced increasing labour costs. Of course modern refrigeration and electrical processing has increased profitability dramatically That is what changed agriculture into a profitable business. It has become a highly profitable business and that is why Governments have got involved and they should never have if they had understood collectivist agriculture like the kibbutz system.
It has become very profitable with Government colluding with big chemical pharma and unionisation of labour who have been successful in getting state protection to create Hybrids and GMO's and chemical fertilisers and pesticides and destroying competitors.
The destruction of conventional farming by this collusion and that is what is destroying conventional agriculture. So, we have a market war between mega-farming and what we now call "Organic" farming.
Great article-- feels like this could be the subject of a much larger work. Though there is much more to our overall poisoning and the enclosure is complete on the macro level as well via the surveillance industry through our electronic devices and satellites. Even without supporting allopathic medicine we still have to deal with the toxic food supply and the increasingly toxic air we breathe, even outside of the cities.
Iatrogenocide is a great term. I can't believe I didn't think of it on my own. As someone who thinks about the iatrogenocide a lot, and who views the world through the lens of enclosure, I also can't believe I never connected the two. Thanks for the great article.
I would suggest using the proper acronym when referring to the pre-OPERATION COVIDIUS biggest scam and PROFIT making of all for the Pharma Industrial Complex: GRID
Nanotechnology is going to take enclosure to the next level. We are going to lose rights to our own bodies and minds. Nanotech has long been an important component of vaccines, and the mRNA jabs with their nanolipid particles and undisclosed adjuvants are almost certainly taking in vivo industrialization to the next level. Soft machines called hydrogels can self assemble in human tissues from their nano components. They can then interface with tissue sonically, electrically, chemically, and optically; that last method can be used to directly edit DNA. Microrobots complete with CPU and memory can circulate in the bloodstream. Metals, plastics, lipids, graphene and viral proteins can be combined to create novel cybernetic fences.
This is a brilliant take on what is happening. I have been convinced for some time that they speak in a kind of code, signaling to one another, and feeding off the energy/neurochemistry that generates. I started thinking about this when I came across a drug for COPD called "trelegy," (oh, great, a drug named after a funeral poem), and when I looked up one of their favorite word condiments, "inclusion," which they sprinkle through vague meaningless passages without specificity, I found this, which corresponds sort of perfectly to "enclosure"
inclusion (n.)
c. 1600, "act of making a part of," from Latin inclusionem (nominative inclusio) "a shutting up, confinement," noun of action from past-participle stem of includere (see include). Meaning "that which is included" is from 1839.
also from c. 1600
Entries linking to inclusion
include (v.)
early 15c., "to shut (someone or something) in materially, enclose, imprison, confine," also "to have (something) as a constituent part," from Latin includere "to shut in, enclose, imprison, insert," from in- "in" (from PIE root *en "in") + claudere "to shut" (see close (v.)). The alleged Sam Goldwyn-ism "Include me out" is attested from 1937. Related: Included; including.
It's like an old activist friend of mine used to say: What do the rich want? EVERYTHING. I think we need to add a new category to the DSM manual of psychiatric disorders: the pathology of wealth. It should be treated as a sickness.
Wow. That's brilliant. Never thought of this before. Boom.
Brilliant observations..it all adds up
Great overview of enclosures. Should have only mentioned France after WWII with the forced destruction of family farms and creation of mega-farms for the monoculture agriculture. Collectivization en Français.
The DNA bits that we were told were contaminations , were NOT contaminations .They were the very purpose of those injections , to make our bodies produce the toxins that will make us have hte designed diseases cancer , cancer of the blood , Multiple Sclerosis , Alzheimers , Parkinson's , etc
The heart attacks were not supposed to happen .Something went wrong there.They make no money when I die of a heart attack.They make a lot of money if I fall sick , chronically sick ,....Then you understand why the Big Pharma companies are selling their "regular" medicine divisions , and BUYING for large sums of money the companies with the expensive cures that will be needed soon by many people... and these technologies are expensive , so they will charge a lot of money to keep you alive , and dependent.
So they are building the infrastructures , because they know it is coming....
The most stupendous buy ? See Polyplus.....unbelievable !
They have the technology to make US GMO ( Genetically Modified Organisms ).So they did it , and nobody understood it !
it is so bad!!!!!
Jean-Marc
"Agriculture does not generate much wealth. A subsistence farmer using the power of his/her own body can generate about $4,000 (in today’s dollars) of economic activity per year."
"Collective agriculture in the Soviet Union, China, and Vietnam accomplished the same goal. Under collective agriculture, land, livestock, and farm equipment were seized by the state in the name of increasing crop yields. In the process, crop yields decreased (for a decade or more), people starved, and many of those who survived migrated to the cities where they were put to work in factories."
Very interesting point of view, however what has made agriculture profitable was mechanisation and hydrocarbon fuels aka fossil fuel. The old steam driven tractors were cumbersome and heavy and modern fuel driven tractors and harvesters are far more efficient. That has essentially reduced increasing labour costs. Of course modern refrigeration and electrical processing has increased profitability dramatically That is what changed agriculture into a profitable business. It has become a highly profitable business and that is why Governments have got involved and they should never have if they had understood collectivist agriculture like the kibbutz system.
It has become very profitable with Government colluding with big chemical pharma and unionisation of labour who have been successful in getting state protection to create Hybrids and GMO's and chemical fertilisers and pesticides and destroying competitors.
The destruction of conventional farming by this collusion and that is what is destroying conventional agriculture. So, we have a market war between mega-farming and what we now call "Organic" farming.
Excellent. Thanks!
Great article-- feels like this could be the subject of a much larger work. Though there is much more to our overall poisoning and the enclosure is complete on the macro level as well via the surveillance industry through our electronic devices and satellites. Even without supporting allopathic medicine we still have to deal with the toxic food supply and the increasingly toxic air we breathe, even outside of the cities.
Iatrogenocide is a great term. I can't believe I didn't think of it on my own. As someone who thinks about the iatrogenocide a lot, and who views the world through the lens of enclosure, I also can't believe I never connected the two. Thanks for the great article.
I would suggest using the proper acronym when referring to the pre-OPERATION COVIDIUS biggest scam and PROFIT making of all for the Pharma Industrial Complex: GRID
Using the "AIDS" one isn't very helpful.
Nanotechnology is going to take enclosure to the next level. We are going to lose rights to our own bodies and minds. Nanotech has long been an important component of vaccines, and the mRNA jabs with their nanolipid particles and undisclosed adjuvants are almost certainly taking in vivo industrialization to the next level. Soft machines called hydrogels can self assemble in human tissues from their nano components. They can then interface with tissue sonically, electrically, chemically, and optically; that last method can be used to directly edit DNA. Microrobots complete with CPU and memory can circulate in the bloodstream. Metals, plastics, lipids, graphene and viral proteins can be combined to create novel cybernetic fences.
“Poisoning people and then treating the injured (Pharma’s business model)”
🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯
Brilliant work Toby!
This is a brilliant take on what is happening. I have been convinced for some time that they speak in a kind of code, signaling to one another, and feeding off the energy/neurochemistry that generates. I started thinking about this when I came across a drug for COPD called "trelegy," (oh, great, a drug named after a funeral poem), and when I looked up one of their favorite word condiments, "inclusion," which they sprinkle through vague meaningless passages without specificity, I found this, which corresponds sort of perfectly to "enclosure"
inclusion (n.)
c. 1600, "act of making a part of," from Latin inclusionem (nominative inclusio) "a shutting up, confinement," noun of action from past-participle stem of includere (see include). Meaning "that which is included" is from 1839.
also from c. 1600
Entries linking to inclusion
include (v.)
early 15c., "to shut (someone or something) in materially, enclose, imprison, confine," also "to have (something) as a constituent part," from Latin includere "to shut in, enclose, imprison, insert," from in- "in" (from PIE root *en "in") + claudere "to shut" (see close (v.)). The alleged Sam Goldwyn-ism "Include me out" is attested from 1937. Related: Included; including.
https://www.etymonline.com/word/inclusion
So I wish that the pyramid separated out those with a billion or more. That is the real story.
I feel you just read what’s on my mind for a while! Nice summary!
It's like an old activist friend of mine used to say: What do the rich want? EVERYTHING. I think we need to add a new category to the DSM manual of psychiatric disorders: the pathology of wealth. It should be treated as a sickness.