And what are the risks that go along with injecting that many kids?
This is utterly gut wrenching. It is so disgusting to keep propping up this novel vax that is so bad the CDC had to change their definition of vaccine. I am a healthcare provider. There has always been “fudged” statistics to justify big pharma’s newest creations. But this outright deceit takes big pharma to a whole new level of corruption for me. And on a personal level, I cannot convince my daughters, who are also healthcare providers, to not vax their kids. It is breaking my heart.......literally.
Thank you for your excellent article. I will pass it on.
It is refreshing to read a well researched article sans hyperbole and 'what ifs' . You and Ivor Cummins approach this subject from a position of rational and cogent examination....This is a prime example why it is important to get a good education, my dad always told me that understanding how the world operates requires the development and application of mathematical skills...hard to argue with good math.....
I like Toby's style and firm stance on this topic.. I will subscribe. I wish he had contacted me about the mathematics of covid. I was the first to tell the world that the "experts" had the IFR roughly 40 x too high (Dr. Iaonnides deserves equal credit here, as he was working on it in paralell). I warned of the catastrophic death and destruction that would come if lockdowns were instituted, weeks before they went into effect and wrote the major networks but got no response. School closings, masks, basically everything. I was right on every one and of course , this topic, the NNV for adults based on Pfizer's own trial data. I got dozens of letters- many from doctors and epidemiologists- saying "it couldn't be that bad". Sixmonths after my video- I did mine the night the trial data came out-, The Lancet published a paper by data scientists who had crunched the numbers and they came to the same values as I, to the hundreds digit for the RRR (Relative Risk Reduction) that the experts and MSM always use to mislead the public ("the vaccine is 95% effective, it's 95% effective", and the ARR (Absolute Risk Reduction) the only number that really matters. The ARR was .84%, and implied a NNV of 119. Here's the video, if you're interested. I believe I was the first on this analysis too. It was originally published on the day the Pfizer trial results became available. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RG7n1ZbDTww&t=97s
Fantastic research. Absolutely amazing article. I will definitely share this with EVERYONE I know. Keep up the great humanitarian work, DO NOT be afraid to speak the truth & facts. We must protect innocent, healthy kids & future generations. Keep fighting & never EVER give up your Constitutional rights & what you believe.
Damn fine work on this one by the way! You'd think our hotshot "regulators" could and would have done this. Well, somebody might have thought that 2 years ago. Obviously you wouldn't have. Covid-1984 has been very disillusioning regarding the FDA. I've known for a while that CDC and NIH weren't good for much. I read Osler's Web.
I. am. speechless.
I will rely on my God-given immune system to pull me through this epidemic and my kids will also
Excellent article. Thank you for sharing!
Thank you so much for your extensive work and guidance to to help us take action before Tuesday's ACIP meeting. I emailed several of the ACIP members listed in your "Let's Go, part 2" post. One of them responded with an automated message that said to leave a public comment and directed me to the ACIP website. I eventually found the page where I could leave a public comment on regulations.gov. (https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/CDC-2021-0112-0001) I was surprised to see there are only 11 comments on that page, all from Oct. 28. It made me wonder if: 1. that isn't actually the correct page; or 2. the powers that be are withholding new comments and not posting them...? Any insight on this?
Thought you and your readers might find this interesting:
Martin Kulldorf compares Israeli study (natural immunity better than vaccine immunity) with the CDC study finding the opposite. ONCE AGAIN, THE CDC HAS PUBLISHED BULLSHIT.
Here is my shocked look:
We are watching now...hope not to see any children dyng just to create the reason for vaccination (in science there should be a cause of an action)
Additionally, if you look at the children who died with/of COVID - there were serious comorbidities in most, which would presumably render the vaccine even less effective in many (most?) cases - thus it would even less likely to prevent any COVID deaths.
Surely at least one member of VRBPAC would have demanded that “Is Gud” be rewritten in blood red... before casting his yes vote.
even more harm came to patients because of the ivermectin cover up worldwide and here is dr lawrie with undercover video https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=338617487686060
Very disturbing. The damage is actually worse when you factor in the damage to the reproductive systems (infertility and sterility) caused by the "vaccine". Pfizer's Eugenics Plan. Crimes Against Humanity.
My hair stood straight up on my head reading this article! This is racketeering by Big Pharma and Crime Against Humanity. Thank you for the research, I will share it as much as I can.