Do you mind posting your form letter? IтАЩd like something to follow. Writing not my greatest strength and I feel more facts is better when trying to prove a point.
Sure. It's on the strong side, so most will want to adjust. I'm too angry at this point to be nice.
To Janet Woodcock,
ABSOLUTELY NOT!
There is zero data supporting this EUA application. ZERO.
That this letter even requires being written is beyond outrageous. As we clearly know, children are not in danger of serious illness or death from Covid-19. In other words taking an experimental injection opens them to no benefit and all risk. Who would make that calculation for a child?
We understand the FDA is now as criminal an organization, as Pfizer is. (Which is not debatable and well documented; see Robert F Kennedy's book The Real Anthony Fauci for details.)
We understand this EUA application and inevitable rubber-stamping of approval is about the FDA protecting Pfizer from liability and keeping the profits flowing.
We get it. We see it.
We're not asking you to protect children - it's quite clear you don't care. We are demanding it.
Further, this is not just a demand that you do not approve the application, this is putting you on notice that you will be held personally responsible. Should the FDA approve this application to experiment on our most vulnerable, it violates the Nuremberg Code which is crystal clear on prohibiting medical experiments for anyone, let alone, children.
You and anyone else who goes along with this crime, will be prosecuted.
Regarding the upcoming decision on whether to recommend an Emergency Use Authorization for vaccinating children between six months and four years, it is critical that you vote against this. Why? Please read all of the below reasons.
#1 This action has no data to support it. Subjecting the most vulnerable age group to the vaccine when there is almost zero risk of children this age dying тАУ or even getting sick тАУ from Covid 19, is against all medical ethics.
#2 The тАШvaccineтАЩ neither prevents Covid nor prevents those with Covid from affecting others. What possible rationale could you have then, for vaccinating (immunizing) children under four years of age when they have virtually no risk from the virus?
#3 The mRNA vaccines appear to pose substantial risks. If you have not looked at either the data on unexplained deaths, or anecdotally, the life stories of those who have been damaged from the Covid vaccine, given your position and background, you have no excuse. All the information is out there and you have a responsibility to look at this. When someone is charged in court claims they did not understand what they were doing was wrong or illegal, there is a saying: тАШthe lack of knowledge about the law is not a legal defenseтАЩ. Similarly, trying to defend your actions in future trials or hearings by saying you did not know the vaccine could injure young children тАУ even if a small number - will not be a workable defense given the total lack of offsetting benefits the vaccine offers to children.
#4 The original clinical trials were flawed and this, like everything, will come out. Without high-quality science reflected in these experiments, the trials could only determine short-term adverse effects and deaths. The trials did not address long-term effects that, if serious, would be borne by children and adolescents for potentially decades. These effects are now showing up, especially in the cardiomyopathy in young boys as well athletes who are now unable to do much of anything.
Lastly, if doing the right thing is not enough, think of this: I, like many, have grandchildren who you are putting at risk; for many, it will be their children. If they were to be injured from having this vaccine, I would not let this go. And no, I would not take violent action (although IтАЩm sure some would). Instead, I will hire the best attorneys I can afford, and I will personally sue everyone of you who voted to recommend the Emergency Use Authorization to allow vaccinating children under five. (I am sure I will not be alone in this). I am not an attorney, but I think that any defense that rests of arguing that you simply were following the CDCтАЩs recommendation will sound like тАЬI was just following ordersтАЩ (and you know how well that one works out). As a group you are about to тАШlock stepтАЩ over a cliff. DonтАЩt do it.
The email addresses made this easy. I have written to each of those on this list. Took no more than 30 minutes at most with copy and paste.
Me too. Even heard back from Janet Woodcock's office already.
Do you mind posting your form letter? IтАЩd like something to follow. Writing not my greatest strength and I feel more facts is better when trying to prove a point.
Sure. It's on the strong side, so most will want to adjust. I'm too angry at this point to be nice.
To Janet Woodcock,
ABSOLUTELY NOT!
There is zero data supporting this EUA application. ZERO.
That this letter even requires being written is beyond outrageous. As we clearly know, children are not in danger of serious illness or death from Covid-19. In other words taking an experimental injection opens them to no benefit and all risk. Who would make that calculation for a child?
We understand the FDA is now as criminal an organization, as Pfizer is. (Which is not debatable and well documented; see Robert F Kennedy's book The Real Anthony Fauci for details.)
We understand this EUA application and inevitable rubber-stamping of approval is about the FDA protecting Pfizer from liability and keeping the profits flowing.
We get it. We see it.
We're not asking you to protect children - it's quite clear you don't care. We are demanding it.
Further, this is not just a demand that you do not approve the application, this is putting you on notice that you will be held personally responsible. Should the FDA approve this application to experiment on our most vulnerable, it violates the Nuremberg Code which is crystal clear on prohibiting medical experiments for anyone, let alone, children.
You and anyone else who goes along with this crime, will be prosecuted.
Sincerely,
Thank you! Well said. Very similar to the message I left on the phone!
Same here. Done! My belly is on fire.
This is great. Thank you.
Feel free to use this: Dear XX:
Regarding the upcoming decision on whether to recommend an Emergency Use Authorization for vaccinating children between six months and four years, it is critical that you vote against this. Why? Please read all of the below reasons.
#1 This action has no data to support it. Subjecting the most vulnerable age group to the vaccine when there is almost zero risk of children this age dying тАУ or even getting sick тАУ from Covid 19, is against all medical ethics.
#2 The тАШvaccineтАЩ neither prevents Covid nor prevents those with Covid from affecting others. What possible rationale could you have then, for vaccinating (immunizing) children under four years of age when they have virtually no risk from the virus?
#3 The mRNA vaccines appear to pose substantial risks. If you have not looked at either the data on unexplained deaths, or anecdotally, the life stories of those who have been damaged from the Covid vaccine, given your position and background, you have no excuse. All the information is out there and you have a responsibility to look at this. When someone is charged in court claims they did not understand what they were doing was wrong or illegal, there is a saying: тАШthe lack of knowledge about the law is not a legal defenseтАЩ. Similarly, trying to defend your actions in future trials or hearings by saying you did not know the vaccine could injure young children тАУ even if a small number - will not be a workable defense given the total lack of offsetting benefits the vaccine offers to children.
#4 The original clinical trials were flawed and this, like everything, will come out. Without high-quality science reflected in these experiments, the trials could only determine short-term adverse effects and deaths. The trials did not address long-term effects that, if serious, would be borne by children and adolescents for potentially decades. These effects are now showing up, especially in the cardiomyopathy in young boys as well athletes who are now unable to do much of anything.
Lastly, if doing the right thing is not enough, think of this: I, like many, have grandchildren who you are putting at risk; for many, it will be their children. If they were to be injured from having this vaccine, I would not let this go. And no, I would not take violent action (although IтАЩm sure some would). Instead, I will hire the best attorneys I can afford, and I will personally sue everyone of you who voted to recommend the Emergency Use Authorization to allow vaccinating children under five. (I am sure I will not be alone in this). I am not an attorney, but I think that any defense that rests of arguing that you simply were following the CDCтАЩs recommendation will sound like тАЬI was just following ordersтАЩ (and you know how well that one works out). As a group you are about to тАШlock stepтАЩ over a cliff. DonтАЩt do it.
Respectfully,
Your name
Wow. ThatтАЩs perfect. I am using that!!