Thinking points, February 9, 2024
Logic, risks, the decision, football, to be good, 417 Stasi groups, experts then and now, knowledge wants to be free, Rome, the essence of this crisis, devilish details, cat rides horse
Here are my latest thinking points.
Logic is not a crime
I refuse to live in a world where logic and reason are banned because the Junta does not want people to know how useless, toxic, and deadly vaccines are.
The Biggest Global Risks in 2024 and beyond are:
1. WEF
2. WHO, UN, GAVI, CEPI
3. BMGF, Wellcome Trust
4. Federal Reserve, BIS, IMF, World Bank
5. Pfizer, Moderna, GSK, Merck, Sanofi
6. FDA, CDC, NIH, HHS
7. CIA, NSA, DoD, DHS, FBI
8. McKinsey, Deloitte, Bain, BCG, Booz Allen
9. BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street
10. Black Cube, Palantir, NSO Group
The biggest problem facing the world is that the ruling class has become predatory and they now have the technical means to cause war and create disease whenever they wish (which is always, because war and disease are so profitable).
No fate but what we create
Vaccines are so bad, you have to choose which side of history you’ll be on. Vaccines are junk science just like Nazi eugenics and racial hygiene theory. You have to make a decision — fit in now and be reviled by future generations or fight back with everything you’ve got against the Fascist Pharma State.
Football
Last year, Pfizer had a PR disaster on their hands when their product (allegedly) caused Damar Hamlin to go into cardiac arrest during Monday Night Football. All signs suggest that they immediately bought off Hamlin and his family. Then Pfizer recruited the most likable guy in the NFL, goofy Travis Kelce, to endorse their deadly product. And then, in a lucky coincidence, Kelce started dating the most famous female pop star in the world.
Pfizer spent about $40 million and the genocide is back on track!
To be good
Here’s the thing: I just want to be good. I’m the son of a minister, perhaps it’s coded in my genes. In order to be good one must tell the truth. But we live in a society that reviles the truth. Our entire economy is based on poison, addiction, conquest, genocide, and lies. So I always act counter-hegemonically. Which is great until one needs something from mainstream society, which is most of the time. That’s why I agitate for revolution — to create a space in mainstream culture for people to be able to be good and tell the truth. Unfortunately this is the perennial quest — the sort of society that should be easy to achieve (because it benefits everyone) but somehow is never realized.
Does the world really need 417 Stasi groups?
“Fact checking” is an entire industry set up to punish anyone who tells the truth about the pharmaceutical industry. According to the NY Times, 417 Stasi “fact check” groups have been set up in recent years to police the narrative on behalf of genocidal capital. They phrased it a bit differently than I did. But still, 417! Astonishing.
Same as it ever was
The average Aztec: “I’m not a cosmologist. If the high priest says human sacrifice will make it rain, I imagine he’s right.”
The average Medieval peasant: “I don’t speak Latin. If the bishop says burning witches at the stake will get rid of the demons that are killing our sheep, he’s probably right.”
The average American: “I’m not a virologist. If Tony Fauci says injecting an experimental gene therapy that has never worked in humans and has no long-term safety data will stop me from getting a cold, then I guess I should roll up my sleeve.”
Gatekeepers like their power
Here’s what’s happening. The printing press made widespread dissemination of the Bible easy and cheap. In the Reformation that followed, Luther said that people should be free to read the Bible for themselves without the intermediary of the church. This caused hundreds of years of wars throughout Europe. Protestants were burned at the stake because the priestly intermediaries did not want to lose the power that went with their control of information.
Today, the internet makes widespread dissemination of ALL information easy and cheap. Intermediaries are not required in ANY field anymore. The people are free to read medical studies, scientific studies, and legal documents (to give just a few examples) for themselves. Parents of vaccine injured children were among the first to figure out the extent of the corruption and official dishonesty in the field of medicine. Public access to knowledge infuriates the intermediaries whose power and class position stemmed from controlling information. So they launched Covid to take the power back by imposing fascism throughout the developed world and censoring anyone who questions the official narrative. I imagine that hundreds of years of wars are likely to ensue until the intermediaries are overthrown once and for all.
Rome
Picture the fall of Rome. Then imagine that thousands of Roman parents figured out that lead pipes and goblets were toxic. They presented their findings to the rulers. And the rulers mandated lead pipes and goblets because the lead industry was so powerful. Substitute vaccines for lead. That’s the U.S. today.
What is the essence of this crisis?
The essence of this crisis is that vaccines have completely destroyed the minds of the bourgeoisie.
That’s literal — overvaccinated people have too much aluminum and other toxicants in their brains.
But it’s also metaphorical. There was an entire meritocratic system developed over hundreds of years of science, learning, universities, and knowledge. Everything was always getting better and better. Vaccines were a technique that appeared like a universal good, unassailable, a great leap forward for humankind. And that turned out to be a lie of unprecedented proportions (from being a savior to now being the main tool of genocide). That fact has broken the minds of a large segment of society. They wander around angry, aimless, endeavoring to get as many injections as possible to ward off their feelings of being duped; but for many they are really just trying to hasten their own demise.
Devil’s in the details
When someone says that they are concerned about global warming ask them if they mean:
A.) Cracking down on dirty coal-fired power plants in India and China, forcing Exxon to clean up its production processes, and encouraging the U.S. military to fight fewer wars of convenience.
or
B.) Arresting small farmers, killing livestock, forcing people to eat bugs, imprisoning the working class in 15-minute cities, and shutting off citizens’ bank accounts if they disagree with the regime or travel too far to visit grandma.
There are enormous differences between these two scenarios. Yet the original environmental promises of scenario A are used to lure people into the dystopian nightmare of scenario B. That’s why people are pushing back.
Your moment of Zen
Cat rides horse. 💞
Blessings to the warriors. 🙌
Prayers for everyone fighting to stop the iatrogenocide. 🙏
Huzzah for the people building the parallel economy our hearts know is possible. ✊
In the comments, please let me know what’s on your mind.
As always, I welcome any corrections.
Toby, I believe this is the biggest threat facing us today…the spraying of chemicals in our skies. As I’ve said in previous comments, the spraying is relentless here in southeastern Pennsylvania, outside of Philly. This new interview on the Greg Hunter Show - link below - has taken my fear to a whole new level. How heartbroken I feel for our children for the earth they will inherit.
I believe I read somewhere that Julian Assange was touching on this and the HAARP technology when he got locked up.
https://rumble.com/v4chzbw-nobody-gets-out-alive-from-climate-engineering-disaster-dane-wigington.html
As convinced as we are that the vaccines are incredibly dangerous and that those who believe in them are either ignorant or totally brainwashed, the other side believes the same about us. They think we're crackpots because they just can't believe the government would do anything to hurt us, esp. when it comes to medical interventions, and certainly not on purpose. They're attached to their opinion, it's their truth, their story, their conviction. Anyone who questions it is othered, misguided, or worse. The sociological problem I suppose we all face is that for every social issue out there, there are those who are for it and those who are against it. What's true, or factual, as it were, is supposed to be discoverable, but people desperately want to be right, which makes it even more tempting to discount anyone who questions the side they've taken. Besides, the truth is often the most unpopular position to take. The desire to be politically correct makes it enticing to defend what may be complete hogwash, for the sake of taking the "correct" position. They get further away from curiosity about what the truth may be, and dig in their heels with strong opinions about the other side. Why is it that truth is so often so unpopular? I guess it comes down to the fact that those with the most money and power do not value the truth. It gets in the way of so much, esp. their schemes to increase their control of other people. And they use every means possible to fool people. People are much easier to fool when there is money, status, or social cache to be had if they're on the right side, politically. And the powerful intentionally demonize those who question their bullshit.