The New York Times assigned four of their top national political reporters to write a long story on “Biden’s First Pandemic Year.” The article is an unwitting case study in everything that is wrong with the Biden administration, the public health establishment, and the corporate media.
I would not trust Walensky, Fauci, or (the unfortunately named) Woodcock to housesit a goldfish. How on earth are these people in the positions that they are in?
As many of you know, bougiecrat is a term I coined. It's a combination of the words bourgeois and technocrat. Bougiecrats are people who believe that our system is meritocratic and that bourgeois technocrats should rule over society. They believe that this is the best of all possible worlds and that modern technology is the solution to all problems. Most Democrats today are bougiecrats. But some Republicans are too (e.g. Paul Ryan, Mitt Romney, Brett Kavanaugh). I probably coined the term some time after reading, "Listen, Liberal: Or, What Ever Happened to the Party of the People?" by Thomas Frank which is brilliant analysis of the modern Democratic Party.
Bougiecrats get so mad if you ask them to think. They look at you like you just switched languages and are talking in gibberish. They have been rewarded for so long for obedient-execution that they believe it's the same thing as thinking. When one points out that it is not, they become angry and want to fight.
thanks, some really excellent points… and when you put Mr. Monsanto/GMO in charge of Agriculture (you get MORE GMO's), put Klaus Schwab World Economic selected Young Leader Jeff Zients on the Coronavirus task force plus Fauci and implement Trump’s Operation Warp speed billion dollar deals with Pfizer, Moderna then you get the Davos plan/agenda to take over the world (New World Order-Great Reset). Not exactly folks who care about public health.
"How is an 85% vaccination rate a success when the vaccine does not actually stop the virus?".
"They are guided by ideology, not facts."
These insights extend beyond the Covid response to the way that the entire government vaccine program operates. Success is measured by how many kids (and sometimes adults) they were able to coerce or con into taking their jabs. It is never about improving health outcomes, which it would be in a saner world. It is simply assumed that if they stab enough people, then they have made the world a better place. Au contraire!
We must stop thinking about these "experts" as doctors or scientists, or what have you. They are politicians of the worst kind, for the most part. They are wolves in sheep's clothing.
It's simple. The cartel knows that important people like the three most liberal (and probably more) Supreme Court justices read the NY Times as one of their primary sources of information. The most liberal also undoubtedly consume CNN. Getting the lies repeated has an impact where it counts. We saw that in the questions from the bench during the mandate cases. That's who these reporters are writing for. Clearly the Justices don't have the critical thinking skills required to spot the bias and deception. Unfortunately I know a lot of ordinary people who don't either.
I am utterly in shock how retarded everyone has become. Mathematics has a way of catching up with you. See my latest article about a big German Insurer now stating in their accident insurance policy that accidents caused by injuries due to mass vaccination will not be paid out... Actuaries may be pricks, but they are not stupid.
Jan 26, 2022·edited Jan 26, 2022Liked by Toby Rogers
This essay is so on point. I'm losing respect for smart people, like many of my friends who are bougiecrats or simply able to make $60,000 + per year working from home, or otherwise don't have to worry about money. They should all see what we see. It's not hidden and doesn't take a rocket scientist to assess the situation.
I recall the phase one and two studies from the trials for both mRNA products indicating that the treatments did not prevent people from getting or spreading the virus. I remember pointing this out to people just as the pundit class started telling us that the vaxx would stop covid and wondering if they were idiots or liars.
Walensky reminds me of Kamala Harris. They’re both in way over their heads, have no confidence in themselves and always appear completely lost.
Its been clear for awhile that DeSantis is a sort of “shadow” President, practically saving the country by himself. He’s always steps ahead of Biden and the contrast is notable to the entire country. I sincerely hope he is the GOP nominee in 2024.
I’m about an hour in to Senator Ron Johnson’s hearing from Monday and so far it’s excellent. It’s long but nevertheless should be distributed far and wide.
It's so dispiriting to read these stories, isn't it? The lack of curiosity on the part of the reporters is just disappointing. We know they're not doing journalism, because we could sit down and bang out a story like this without consulting a single source. Propaganda is predictable and stultifying.
The question is: do we really believe in Walensky's shock? Do we believe Fauci ever thought there was a medical or scientific justification for vaccine mandates? Do we believe the Times reporter believes these things?
For me, the only question I answer yes to, sadly, is the third. The reporters are dumb fascist clowns, a good reminder of what happens when we fail to ask questions and hold people accountable based upon who they are (or what they are)-- and when we create systems that publicly shame and cancel contrarians.
It's interesting watching Walensky. She is completely incompetent and way out of her league but without the cult following of Little Mengele Fauci. Wonder if she gets thrown under the bus?
“None of the bourgeois institutions that caused this problem (from the corporate media to the government to the public health establishment) are capable of correcting course based on new data. They are guided by ideology, not facts.“
But hey , a giant, economy-wrecking, life-destroying “climate bill” will be different.
I would not trust Walensky, Fauci, or (the unfortunately named) Woodcock to housesit a goldfish. How on earth are these people in the positions that they are in?
As many of you know, bougiecrat is a term I coined. It's a combination of the words bourgeois and technocrat. Bougiecrats are people who believe that our system is meritocratic and that bourgeois technocrats should rule over society. They believe that this is the best of all possible worlds and that modern technology is the solution to all problems. Most Democrats today are bougiecrats. But some Republicans are too (e.g. Paul Ryan, Mitt Romney, Brett Kavanaugh). I probably coined the term some time after reading, "Listen, Liberal: Or, What Ever Happened to the Party of the People?" by Thomas Frank which is brilliant analysis of the modern Democratic Party.
Bougiecrats get so mad if you ask them to think. They look at you like you just switched languages and are talking in gibberish. They have been rewarded for so long for obedient-execution that they believe it's the same thing as thinking. When one points out that it is not, they become angry and want to fight.
thanks, some really excellent points… and when you put Mr. Monsanto/GMO in charge of Agriculture (you get MORE GMO's), put Klaus Schwab World Economic selected Young Leader Jeff Zients on the Coronavirus task force plus Fauci and implement Trump’s Operation Warp speed billion dollar deals with Pfizer, Moderna then you get the Davos plan/agenda to take over the world (New World Order-Great Reset). Not exactly folks who care about public health.
“A body of men holding themselves accountable to nobody ought not to be trusted by anybody.”
– Thomas Paine
"How is an 85% vaccination rate a success when the vaccine does not actually stop the virus?".
"They are guided by ideology, not facts."
These insights extend beyond the Covid response to the way that the entire government vaccine program operates. Success is measured by how many kids (and sometimes adults) they were able to coerce or con into taking their jabs. It is never about improving health outcomes, which it would be in a saner world. It is simply assumed that if they stab enough people, then they have made the world a better place. Au contraire!
We must stop thinking about these "experts" as doctors or scientists, or what have you. They are politicians of the worst kind, for the most part. They are wolves in sheep's clothing.
You have written some good ones.... this is Starks dunking on Jordan.
It's simple. The cartel knows that important people like the three most liberal (and probably more) Supreme Court justices read the NY Times as one of their primary sources of information. The most liberal also undoubtedly consume CNN. Getting the lies repeated has an impact where it counts. We saw that in the questions from the bench during the mandate cases. That's who these reporters are writing for. Clearly the Justices don't have the critical thinking skills required to spot the bias and deception. Unfortunately I know a lot of ordinary people who don't either.
I am utterly in shock how retarded everyone has become. Mathematics has a way of catching up with you. See my latest article about a big German Insurer now stating in their accident insurance policy that accidents caused by injuries due to mass vaccination will not be paid out... Actuaries may be pricks, but they are not stupid.
This essay is so on point. I'm losing respect for smart people, like many of my friends who are bougiecrats or simply able to make $60,000 + per year working from home, or otherwise don't have to worry about money. They should all see what we see. It's not hidden and doesn't take a rocket scientist to assess the situation.
I recall the phase one and two studies from the trials for both mRNA products indicating that the treatments did not prevent people from getting or spreading the virus. I remember pointing this out to people just as the pundit class started telling us that the vaxx would stop covid and wondering if they were idiots or liars.
Walensky reminds me of Kamala Harris. They’re both in way over their heads, have no confidence in themselves and always appear completely lost.
Its been clear for awhile that DeSantis is a sort of “shadow” President, practically saving the country by himself. He’s always steps ahead of Biden and the contrast is notable to the entire country. I sincerely hope he is the GOP nominee in 2024.
I’m about an hour in to Senator Ron Johnson’s hearing from Monday and so far it’s excellent. It’s long but nevertheless should be distributed far and wide.
It's so dispiriting to read these stories, isn't it? The lack of curiosity on the part of the reporters is just disappointing. We know they're not doing journalism, because we could sit down and bang out a story like this without consulting a single source. Propaganda is predictable and stultifying.
The question is: do we really believe in Walensky's shock? Do we believe Fauci ever thought there was a medical or scientific justification for vaccine mandates? Do we believe the Times reporter believes these things?
For me, the only question I answer yes to, sadly, is the third. The reporters are dumb fascist clowns, a good reminder of what happens when we fail to ask questions and hold people accountable based upon who they are (or what they are)-- and when we create systems that publicly shame and cancel contrarians.
It's interesting watching Walensky. She is completely incompetent and way out of her league but without the cult following of Little Mengele Fauci. Wonder if she gets thrown under the bus?
Everyone knows there is no cure for the common cold.
We have had a cultural lobotomy.
The 911 psyop, was a precursor to this plan-demic psyop.
The Aids, Ebola, Says and Anthrax scares were all "Hypnosis for Dummies" embedded anchors.
Try Architects and Engineers for nine eleven truth to see how science is ignored in plain site.
“None of the bourgeois institutions that caused this problem (from the corporate media to the government to the public health establishment) are capable of correcting course based on new data. They are guided by ideology, not facts.“
But hey , a giant, economy-wrecking, life-destroying “climate bill” will be different.