Toby - the mysterious hepatitis cases in children might be linked to an adenovirus. And the J&J is an adenovirus shot. Could these 2 things be related and might that have something to do with J&J being pulled?
There no evidence the virus even exists and therefore no evidence that there was a pandemic in the first place. You’ve had two years to research and analyze it for yourself and still promote the Big Lie, along with unnecessary drugs to treat and “shots that work” against a virus that doesn’t exist outside of the computer program it was created on.
This is an excellent, well researched essay. You lay it out clearly, unless you offer NIH and NAID a piece of the action you don’t get approved. Wow! Talk about agency capture. But this is only a small piece of the puzzle, along with supply chain shortages, fuel inflation, skyrocketing house appreciation, residential rent exploration, loss of 50% grain production, war in Ukraine, food price hikes, food riots in Egypt, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, loss of arable land from land grabs by sociopathic billionaires and government, crazy attacks in food storage facilities, loss of fertilizer which will result in a billion people starving to death next year, stock market slow moving crash, pandemic return in the fall, the new WHO treaty they are determined to shove down our throats and the booming parts of our depressed economy in defence spending and surveillance capitalism, for slow-moving, non-nuclear WW3. What does all this mean? Who is behind it? What can we do? This is brutal deglobalization for the US positioning itself for the next century as global hegemony. Russia senses this but fell into the trap and China senses it and doesn’t know what to do! And Europe is fuel-less, foodless and hapless, and happy to go along with the hegemon. Where does all this go? Not anywhere where we need to be, but never take your eyes off the big picture.
This move does not surprise me even though it doesn’t make sense from a rational person’s standpoint. We are dealing with psychopaths at the top of the food chain and their unfathomably vast army of useful idiots planted (and paid for) everywhere on down the chain from the FDA to your local family doctor.
I do think there’s plenty of merit to the comments that mentioned pay to play, cartel on cartel violence, designating a sacrificial lamb etc. They’ve found a somewhat plausible and convenient way to convince the mostly non-critical thinking public why they should knock out the viral vector platform and ensure that the future is mRNA technology.
J&J has played its part. It drew in those skeptical of the mRNA jabs and delivered the spike protein anyway. It made people feel like they still had some choice in the matter. Now perhaps it will be useful in garnering brownie points (temporarily) by allowing the powers that be to take a false stand for safety.
But really, the psychopaths just want mRNA. That’s their future plan for “humanity.” They’re all about AI, human 2.0 stuff. Viral vector just does not lend itself to that realm the way mRNA plug-n-play technology does.
Have you looked into Karen Kingston’s info on the various patents associated with the mRNA vaccines? (She’s the former Pfizer employee who founded the biotech consulting agency Varitage.) That really helped me understand why they push the mRNA platform. Although she’s not comfortable speculating what it will be used for in the future, she does a great job of laying out what is happening now by following the patent trails. I snagged some bullet points from one of her presentations:
* all of the COVID-19 “vaccines” are bioweapons (duh)
* there are four different PEGylated lipid nano particles in the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (PEG = polyethylene glycol):
1. the cholesterol lipid which enables the vaccine ingredients to be transported by the blood
2. the phospholipid which adheres to the cell membrane to make it permeable
3. an ionizable lipid which provides a positive ionic charge so the mRNA can enter the cell
4. Lastly, a PEGylated lipid made by SINOPEG, a Chinese company, which contains graphene oxide
* mRNA is very unstable, thus it needs a “biosphere” to protect it until it’s been injected and can enter your cells. The biosphere is provided by the lipid nano particles and graphene oxide which is 4,000 time stronger than titanium and can withstand very high temperatures.
* Graphene oxide is also an excellent conductor of electricity, and can host a magnetic field
* Graphene oxide is not listed in the patent applications because it’s considered a “trade secret” and they don’t have to disclose it. It is poisonous to humans, and it is the main ingredient in hydrogel which can be used to create a brain-computer interface and a drug delivery system, though Kingston notes that this is not possible “with this round [of vaccines]” because “they rushed this thing out. They’re just seeing how much they can put into people before they… die.”
* The graphene oxide in the vaccines is neutrally charged (inactive), however if/when it becomes positively charged, such as by electromagnetic radiation (radio frequency, such as wireless devices, wireless networks such as 5G, etc.), it can destroy anything it comes into contact with and therefore can cause great damage and death depending on how much of it exists in the body and where it is located.
* Multiple COVID-19 “vaccines” and booster shots may increase the amount of graphene oxide in the body
You can see how much potential ($ & power) is here even if they haven’t yet worked out the kinks. They need to keep experimenting with mRNA jabs to gather data for whatever it is they plan on rolling out in the future. That’s one possible reason why the batches aren’t uniform. (Howbadismybatch.com) They’re testing limits in plain sight, probably paying more attention to VAERS reports than we are.
I don’t think we should expect anything at this point to make sense to a sane person. I’m thankful for the few credentialed people like Kingston and “the 5 docs” (Madej, Northrup, Tenpenny, Merritt, Palevski) who are willing to stick their necks out into the realm of conspiracy theory to provide this kind of info.
Not much gets by you, so forgive me if this is all stuff you’ve chewed on before. Thanks for the forum you provide to share these thoughts. You’re the best. 😊
Sorry to sound cynical, but J & J was probably removed because it was less effective at killing off the population than Pfizer or Moderna. It also may be an attempt to throw a bone to those who are skeptical of the vaccines, in an attempt to deflect attention from the more deadly vaccine products.
Fauci: "I’m not sure what people are waiting for when you say they’re waiting for something else." - Um, where are these people who are "waiting for something else"? There are plenty of alternatives available. Sounds like he's priming the public for the next BigPharma "miracle."
"So the FDA appears to be slow walking the review in order to give preference to existing mRNA shots on the market. Again, why?" - My guess is because they need to use up the leftover stockpiles the govt already purchased.
J & J isn't an mRNA, right? that's the real problem. Pfizer n Moderna have over 100 different mRNA shots in the works. The mRNA is the new pot of gold, the FDA won't stop it for sure.
The gov't probably promised a guaranteed income to Pfizer in the form of purchasing a certain number of doses. That would be a reason not to ban the Pfizer jabs. It's certainly about money. J&J must not have made the right deals. Somebody ain't gettin' their beak wet.
May 7, 2022·edited May 7, 2022Liked by Toby Rogers
The 2017 SPARS simulation (see chapter 12 in RFK Jr.'s "The Real Anthony Fauci"), done by Gates et al, included ways to assure the public that the long term neurological damage done by the simulated vaccines wasn't attributed to the shots. The effects occur a year later. Cases of "SPARS" are hyped, so serious long term effects of the theoretical vax are never associated with it or deemed consequential.
Perhaps, as others have suggested, part of this J&J focus is distraction from the long term devastation caused by all of the shots? Too many adverse effects to simply deny? Make J&J culpable to deflect attention ? It's not a long term solution, but buys time until the next "plandemic"...
Not that different from what some others have said, but it was very eerie to read it in the book. "SPARS" only had one "vaccine". I suspect the options this time were planned just for this. To catch as many people in the web as possible, then sacrifice the more "traditional" shots to go ahead with mRNA jabs for every human and every human "weakness". Sorry to be cynical, but after listening to some of the meetings to approve these things I remain incredulous...
"Harm seems to be the only goal" may or may not be be true but you have already offered all the rationale that is necessary in “follow the money”. The additional reach weakens your otherwise powerful argument.
Interesting comment from Naomi Wolf who's team at Daily Clout is doing a great job combing through the Pfizer documents dump, and packaging the information up for lawyers.
The same day a lawyers letter went to an Attorney General, the FDA came out and said the J & J vaccine is causing blood clots and it's use will be limited.
Few people take the J and J vax, so FDA is effectively banning nothing but making it look like they are not a fully captured regulatory agency. Meanwhile Pfizer is full steam ahead when it is doing far more damage since more people are taking it. JJ is the fall guy.
Toby - the mysterious hepatitis cases in children might be linked to an adenovirus. And the J&J is an adenovirus shot. Could these 2 things be related and might that have something to do with J&J being pulled?
Because the mRNA shots are bio weapons and we are the target
There no evidence the virus even exists and therefore no evidence that there was a pandemic in the first place. You’ve had two years to research and analyze it for yourself and still promote the Big Lie, along with unnecessary drugs to treat and “shots that work” against a virus that doesn’t exist outside of the computer program it was created on.
How do I get around this madness in New York colleges and universities requiring the jab? Sos
This is an excellent, well researched essay. You lay it out clearly, unless you offer NIH and NAID a piece of the action you don’t get approved. Wow! Talk about agency capture. But this is only a small piece of the puzzle, along with supply chain shortages, fuel inflation, skyrocketing house appreciation, residential rent exploration, loss of 50% grain production, war in Ukraine, food price hikes, food riots in Egypt, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, loss of arable land from land grabs by sociopathic billionaires and government, crazy attacks in food storage facilities, loss of fertilizer which will result in a billion people starving to death next year, stock market slow moving crash, pandemic return in the fall, the new WHO treaty they are determined to shove down our throats and the booming parts of our depressed economy in defence spending and surveillance capitalism, for slow-moving, non-nuclear WW3. What does all this mean? Who is behind it? What can we do? This is brutal deglobalization for the US positioning itself for the next century as global hegemony. Russia senses this but fell into the trap and China senses it and doesn’t know what to do! And Europe is fuel-less, foodless and hapless, and happy to go along with the hegemon. Where does all this go? Not anywhere where we need to be, but never take your eyes off the big picture.
This move does not surprise me even though it doesn’t make sense from a rational person’s standpoint. We are dealing with psychopaths at the top of the food chain and their unfathomably vast army of useful idiots planted (and paid for) everywhere on down the chain from the FDA to your local family doctor.
I do think there’s plenty of merit to the comments that mentioned pay to play, cartel on cartel violence, designating a sacrificial lamb etc. They’ve found a somewhat plausible and convenient way to convince the mostly non-critical thinking public why they should knock out the viral vector platform and ensure that the future is mRNA technology.
J&J has played its part. It drew in those skeptical of the mRNA jabs and delivered the spike protein anyway. It made people feel like they still had some choice in the matter. Now perhaps it will be useful in garnering brownie points (temporarily) by allowing the powers that be to take a false stand for safety.
But really, the psychopaths just want mRNA. That’s their future plan for “humanity.” They’re all about AI, human 2.0 stuff. Viral vector just does not lend itself to that realm the way mRNA plug-n-play technology does.
Have you looked into Karen Kingston’s info on the various patents associated with the mRNA vaccines? (She’s the former Pfizer employee who founded the biotech consulting agency Varitage.) That really helped me understand why they push the mRNA platform. Although she’s not comfortable speculating what it will be used for in the future, she does a great job of laying out what is happening now by following the patent trails. I snagged some bullet points from one of her presentations:
* all of the COVID-19 “vaccines” are bioweapons (duh)
* there are four different PEGylated lipid nano particles in the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (PEG = polyethylene glycol):
1. the cholesterol lipid which enables the vaccine ingredients to be transported by the blood
2. the phospholipid which adheres to the cell membrane to make it permeable
3. an ionizable lipid which provides a positive ionic charge so the mRNA can enter the cell
4. Lastly, a PEGylated lipid made by SINOPEG, a Chinese company, which contains graphene oxide
* mRNA is very unstable, thus it needs a “biosphere” to protect it until it’s been injected and can enter your cells. The biosphere is provided by the lipid nano particles and graphene oxide which is 4,000 time stronger than titanium and can withstand very high temperatures.
* Graphene oxide is also an excellent conductor of electricity, and can host a magnetic field
* Graphene oxide is not listed in the patent applications because it’s considered a “trade secret” and they don’t have to disclose it. It is poisonous to humans, and it is the main ingredient in hydrogel which can be used to create a brain-computer interface and a drug delivery system, though Kingston notes that this is not possible “with this round [of vaccines]” because “they rushed this thing out. They’re just seeing how much they can put into people before they… die.”
* The graphene oxide in the vaccines is neutrally charged (inactive), however if/when it becomes positively charged, such as by electromagnetic radiation (radio frequency, such as wireless devices, wireless networks such as 5G, etc.), it can destroy anything it comes into contact with and therefore can cause great damage and death depending on how much of it exists in the body and where it is located.
* Multiple COVID-19 “vaccines” and booster shots may increase the amount of graphene oxide in the body
You can see how much potential ($ & power) is here even if they haven’t yet worked out the kinks. They need to keep experimenting with mRNA jabs to gather data for whatever it is they plan on rolling out in the future. That’s one possible reason why the batches aren’t uniform. (Howbadismybatch.com) They’re testing limits in plain sight, probably paying more attention to VAERS reports than we are.
I don’t think we should expect anything at this point to make sense to a sane person. I’m thankful for the few credentialed people like Kingston and “the 5 docs” (Madej, Northrup, Tenpenny, Merritt, Palevski) who are willing to stick their necks out into the realm of conspiracy theory to provide this kind of info.
Not much gets by you, so forgive me if this is all stuff you’ve chewed on before. Thanks for the forum you provide to share these thoughts. You’re the best. 😊
Follow the science but 9 billion people also men can get pragnent
Sorry to sound cynical, but J & J was probably removed because it was less effective at killing off the population than Pfizer or Moderna. It also may be an attempt to throw a bone to those who are skeptical of the vaccines, in an attempt to deflect attention from the more deadly vaccine products.
Fauci: "I’m not sure what people are waiting for when you say they’re waiting for something else." - Um, where are these people who are "waiting for something else"? There are plenty of alternatives available. Sounds like he's priming the public for the next BigPharma "miracle."
"So the FDA appears to be slow walking the review in order to give preference to existing mRNA shots on the market. Again, why?" - My guess is because they need to use up the leftover stockpiles the govt already purchased.
J & J isn't an mRNA, right? that's the real problem. Pfizer n Moderna have over 100 different mRNA shots in the works. The mRNA is the new pot of gold, the FDA won't stop it for sure.
The gov't probably promised a guaranteed income to Pfizer in the form of purchasing a certain number of doses. That would be a reason not to ban the Pfizer jabs. It's certainly about money. J&J must not have made the right deals. Somebody ain't gettin' their beak wet.
The 2017 SPARS simulation (see chapter 12 in RFK Jr.'s "The Real Anthony Fauci"), done by Gates et al, included ways to assure the public that the long term neurological damage done by the simulated vaccines wasn't attributed to the shots. The effects occur a year later. Cases of "SPARS" are hyped, so serious long term effects of the theoretical vax are never associated with it or deemed consequential.
Perhaps, as others have suggested, part of this J&J focus is distraction from the long term devastation caused by all of the shots? Too many adverse effects to simply deny? Make J&J culpable to deflect attention ? It's not a long term solution, but buys time until the next "plandemic"...
Not that different from what some others have said, but it was very eerie to read it in the book. "SPARS" only had one "vaccine". I suspect the options this time were planned just for this. To catch as many people in the web as possible, then sacrifice the more "traditional" shots to go ahead with mRNA jabs for every human and every human "weakness". Sorry to be cynical, but after listening to some of the meetings to approve these things I remain incredulous...
"Harm seems to be the only goal" may or may not be be true but you have already offered all the rationale that is necessary in “follow the money”. The additional reach weakens your otherwise powerful argument.
Interesting comment from Naomi Wolf who's team at Daily Clout is doing a great job combing through the Pfizer documents dump, and packaging the information up for lawyers.
The same day a lawyers letter went to an Attorney General, the FDA came out and said the J & J vaccine is causing blood clots and it's use will be limited.
https://gab.com/Wikihospitals/posts/108253219053791760
Few people take the J and J vax, so FDA is effectively banning nothing but making it look like they are not a fully captured regulatory agency. Meanwhile Pfizer is full steam ahead when it is doing far more damage since more people are taking it. JJ is the fall guy.
A vast number of people are making a vast amount of money. Period. And on a side note, all three letter agencies are corrupt af.