The CDC's very strange fallback position on Covid shots
What at first appears reasonable soon becomes sinister
I. The CDC comes up with a new plan
I watched the January meeting of the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) and the February meeting of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) where they discussed plans for Covid shots going forward. The meetings were completely heartbreaking — these knuckleheads have learned nothing from the last three years. As I have said before, it’s like watching the Nazis’ Wannsee Conference in real time as the American bougiecrats plan their version of the Final Solution.
The genocidal “experts” are well aware that the public has rejected their murderous advice. They know that only 15% of the American public has been foolish enough to get the bivalent clot shot that was only tested in 8 mice. VRBPAC member Oveta Fuller was one of the people who got the bivalent clot shot and then she died suddenly in November. So the bougiecrats are trying to find a face-saving way to retreat. The plan that they are coalescing around is as follows:
1. Keep officially recommending the bivalent shots even though 85%+ of the public will reject that advice;
2. Keep sprinkling official meetings with platitudes about wanting better vaccines and new platforms in order to keep the research money flowing from Congress; and
3. Keep forcing the clot shot multiple times per year on four captive populations — front-line health workers, seniors, the immunocompromised, and pregnant women (whom the CDC calls “pregnant people” because the CDC is insane).
In the last week, this fallback vaccination plan (especially part 3) has been rolled out by the World Health Organization (WHO), the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI), and the mainstream media in the U.S. (acting at the behest of the CDC and Pharma PR agencies).
The headlines look like this:
At first glance, this appears in line with formerly heretical positions such as the Great Barrington Declaration that recommended targeted protection for certain vulnerable populations.
Lots of people, including many in the movement, read these articles and breathe a sigh of relief. ‘Finally, kids will be spared from the clot shot, young adults will be spared, perhaps common sense is finally returning to the CDC’ — is how that thought bubble goes.
I want to challenge that hopeful view and suggest that something much more sinister is going on.
II. The devil is in the details
Let’s work through each of these different groups in turn:
Requiring Covid shots for frontline healthcare workers is a way to purge the medical profession of critical thinkers. The medical mafia is making sure that there will be no whistleblowers from the inside because those people will never get hired in the first place. It is critically important to the cartel to remove critical thinkers from the frontline healthcare workforce because they are the ones who will see vaccine injury. The medical profession will thus appear to speak as one because it’s a club that only admits people who are sworn allies of the cartel.
Let’s think through these other three groups — seniors, the immunocompromised, and pregnant women. What do these three groups have in common?
1. These three groups of people are purposefully excluded from vaccine clinical trials. So we have no data on how Covid vaccines will perform in these populations. And now that reformulated Covid shots are not tested in humans (just a few mice) we will never have those data. Injecting these people is the experiment and because the FDA & CDC do not care about post-marketing surveillance, we’ll never know for certain what is happening to them.
2. These three groups of people are extremely vulnerable and dependent on the medical system.
Many seniors are captive in long-term care facilities that require vaccines.
The immunocompromised are frequently in and out of doctors’ offices and many feel that they depend on the medical profession in order to survive.
Most pregnant women give birth in a hospital where they are subject to its rules and armies of staff who can apply misplaced arguments from authority to encourage compliance.
Said differently, these three groups of people (along with children) have the least leverage against the medical system and very little political power.
3. These three groups of people (along with children under 1) are the least likely to benefit from these shots.
Old people are vulnerable to infections like the flu because of immunosenescence — the immune system declines over time. But that also means that a huge percentage of seniors (upwards of half) mount no immune response to vaccines at all. For those who mount no immune response, by definition, these shots can only cause harm. Seniors would be much better off engaging in prophylaxis with hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, and/or other medicines/supplements rather than asking their immune systems to do something that they are not capable of.
The immunocompromised do not generate a robust immune response to vaccines either, so they would be much better off receiving prophylaxis via hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, and/or other medicines/supplements rather than trying to goose the immune system into doing something that it is not capable of.
Pregnant women are in an age group that is not at risk from Covid — but the fetus that they are carrying certainly is at risk of vaccine injury. Any vaccines during pregnancy are a crime against humanity.
The reason they vaccinate children so many times in the first year of life is that they don’t mount much of an immune response either — their immune system is too immature. That’s according to Claire-Anne Siegrist, Head of the WHO Collaborating Center for Neonatal Vaccinology, writing in chapter 2 of Plotkin’s Vaccines, the standard vaccine textbook used in many medical schools. In the first year of life, infants get immune support from their mother via breastmilk. If one wanted to be scientific, one would recommend breastfeeding (not vaccines) in the first year of life. Yet the FDA just authorized bivalent Covid “booster” shots for children as young as 6 months — without even allowing the VRBPAC to meet to consider the evidence — because the FDA works for the cartel.
4. If vaccine injury happens in these populations, the powers that be can always blame something else.
A senior citizen is killed by the clot shot? Official story: “Old people die.”
An immunocompromised person is killed by the clot shot? Official story: “They were immunocompromised.”
A pregnant woman loses her baby to the clot shot? Official story: “Lots of women miscarry.”
In every case, vaccine injury can be, is, and will be swept under the rug.
III. Eugenics and depopulation
So what we are left with is the following plan (from the WHO, CDC, ATAGI, and public health authorities across the developed world):
• Everyone in the medical profession is forced to participate in an Asch Conformity Experiment as a condition of employment. Only true believers in the cartel need apply.
• The people who are the most vulnerable to coercion but least likely to benefit from the shots will be forced to get them.
• The eugenicists’ dreams all come true — the clot shot accelerates the rate at which old people die, kills the “infirm” (aka the immunocompromised), and brings the birth rate down to zero as everyone becomes infertile and women miscarry. Depopulation accomplished.
I’d love to be wrong about this so by all means please tell me if I’m misunderstanding something. But as I’m staring at the CDC’s plan I’m seeing eugenics made permanent as official government policy.
The newbies to the movement and the few elite gatekeepers who are trying to be honest brokers (e.g. Vinay Prasad and the team behind the Great Barrington Declaration) still cling to the notion that “targeted vaccination of vulnerable populations” is good policy. It’s not. Medically vulnerable populations would be infinitely better off following FLCCC prophylaxis protocols and avoiding vaccines altogether. Covid shots benefit no one and should be pulled from the market immediately.
Blessings to the warriors. 🙌
Prayers for the vaccine-injured and everyone fighting to stop the iatrogenocide. 🙏
Huzzah for everyone working to build the alternative society our hearts know is possible. ✊
In the comments, please let me know what’s on your mind.
As always, I welcome any corrections.
Hi Toby and all,
gee I'm tired :(. I had hoped that as all of the excess deaths and injuries were now finally coming out, and even slipping into msm here and there, that our jabbed friends and family would by now be starting to say, "OMG, I get it!!"....but instead, as I have started sharing the new info, hoping that friends and family will at least reconsider that next booster, they are simply saying things like, "look, I've taken the shots now, so I don't want to see these articles!" Really!? Yep, that is what I got from my Dad, and one of my close friends. My mother wouldn't even look at the article I sent last week and said, "I believe you, but I don't want to read it". What does that even mean? And I will add that I haven't sent any of them anything for about 6 months now. So it's not like I was spamming them. I imagine you have all had simliar.
I see the cracks in the damn wall slowly getting bigger, but these criminals keep finding shifty ways to manipulate or 'work' the truth, as per your article Toby.
Do you guys think the full truth will finally come out? I waver lately, yet I hope, so, so much that it will.
I'm sure I'm not the only one feeling so tired of this. I'm sure that everyone here is too. I hope everyone has their own way of finding some peace in all of this. I've been taking breaks from it all, playing music and tuning out a bit lately, for my own sanity and bit of happiness.
Big hugs to everyone here XO.
I remember watching “Children of Men,” a dystopian movie in which humans are infertile. I thought, “What an absurd premise. What could ever cause that?” (Excellent movie, BTW, with MIchael Caine playing an aging pothead.) Most hard sci-fi is social commentary, not fantasy.