The FDA briefing document is preposterous junk science and it must be withdrawn immediately
Thank you so much for this article. As a parent of 3 and VERY VERY concerned about what's going on here. And even more concerned about all the kids whom have already received this shot from parents whom haven't done their research.. this is so scary and I can't believe people are still in line for this.
Nice work. thanks for referring to my work! You are in my new slide deck which you'll find fun: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1qJRRFt7PkLTJSv0P-JKWP6YUB4Axa2gtROqpMJ9HkYY/
Toby -- great article, thank you for posting. Agree that the logic in the application is deeply flawed. I have been specifically focused on the risk-benefit of COVID-recovered (previously infected) 5-11 yos. Please look at my substack on this:
With low already low rates of morbidity, intrisnic protection from natural immunity, and reduced VE in the recovered, recovered 5-11yos represent the narrowest therapeutic (possibly inverted) window.
Thank you for your effort.
Thanks for the info I appreciate it and I believe I will have to homeschool my 15 year old soon . I believe the public school will demand the jab soon . The world as we once knew it is gone. Freedom gone. Very scary.
Did you notice they changed the formula post-trial? They replaced phosphate buffered-saline with tromethamine. Why would they change the formula AFTER the trial?
The whole idea a Vaxing children this young, with almost ZERO threat from CoVid-1984 is insane.
Thanks for putting this together. I appreciate everyone who is taking their time and effort to call out this fraud.
This should not be put out there for children. They can fight this virus. The problems I read from kids getting these jabs are scary. I ask that this never because a bailable for these young children.
Tromethamine (Tris) as a buffer instead of phosphate is not the worst thing about this concoction tbqh. The distinct probability is that the CMC people at Pfizer innocently noticed that their lipid nanoparticles are "falling out" of solution over time in phosphate, or some other stability question. Be much more concerned about modified RNA persisting, being reverse-transcribed and inserting themselves into the genome of affected cells. This has been shown with coronavirums, and there is no data on why this would not happen with a long-lasting 4.2kb indestructible RNA fragment that persists and forms translatable proteins "for weeks."
So shocking and heartbreaking. Children will be harmed if this gets EUA, I hope and pray it doesn’t. I also feel the media is to blame as so many parents are begging for this product to be put in their kids arms. ( They of course have no idea of the harms. ) The issue with this whole vax racket is all children are hurt from any vax for at least a short while, but they tell the parents those side effects mean “it’s working “ and it’s only when some children don’t get better parents find out the truth. We unfortunately live in a child sacrifice, for profit for a few, death cult. This needs to change immediately of course so our children are protected from these monsters.
Hope you don't mind, but I've posted the first several paragraphs of your piece on my site and linked back to it, to share this crucial information.
And yes, hopefully a revolution of sorts will happen. It certainly needs to happen.
Thank You for the info, this situation and fast tracking is so frustrating. I have lost faith in these institutions. I wish you the best in your pursuit of unravelling the truth. Godspeed!
I’m so tired of all the lies!! Kids should never get this shot!!!’
Also look in Pfizer’s application to see that they claim Covid is a top 10 killer of children even though since the beginning of the pandemic 50,000 children under the age of 18 have died from other causes and with Covid it’s only been 335; however the researchers compared Covid over months to the other possible causes of death in a weeks time to skew the numbers
International Criminal Court Case being brought by Dr. Richard Fleming + Scientists.
correction: Third flag is incorrect. "Phase 2/3 is being conducted in the United States, Finland, Poland, and Spain. The Phase 2/3 portion of the study did not exclude children with a history of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection or clinical symptoms/signs of COVID-19" page 17
They intentionally did not check for status of SARSCOV2 infection prior to entry into the Phase2/3 study. All references in their data package to no evidence of infection or evidence of infection refers to the kids that got covid during the study.
This confounds all data and invalidates the experiment, because we do not know which kids had existing antibodies prior to entry in the experiment. As you point out, it is the random selected sample of less than 100 study participants that had their antibodies checked in a laboratory that are the justification for the validity of the experiment, since they have not actually proven anything in regards to hospitalization, or death, or severe sequela in this small of a trial.
Interesting fact: based on their own data submission package, number needed to vaccinate to save one life in this age group is 374,613. And that is a ridiculously LOW number because it only considers confirmed cases, when there is general agreement that there are a lot of kids in this age group that had covid and weren't tested, which increase the number needed to vaccinate.
see my public comment: