(Mother Who was Sexually Trafficked by Epstein Pedophilia Network Seeks Justice for Her Daughter Who was Medically Kidnapped)
"Many of you should probably not watch this video, as it could cause you severe emotional trauma. If you have watched the documentary published by Polish film producer Patryk Vega, called “Eyes of the Devil,” and were able to handle that, then please know that Jennifer’s story is far worse."
I was aware of the jyst of everything but Dang! Is any of this exposure credible in courts...?? How do we get this out there for everyone?? I'm banned on Twitter so there's that but wow mind is blown
Mr. Rogers, can you provide a link to your thesis / study of autism and vaccines please? I saw that in one of your articles and meant to look it up but then lost the tab. I would like to read it. Thanks.
When checking table 14 of the FDA report, there is someting extremly crazy.
Use of antipyretic medication or pain medication was 1.7 times higher (14.4% vs 8.3%) after the 1st dose of the vaccine and 2.4 times higher (19.7% vs 8.1%) after the 2nd dose than in the control group. These differences after both the first and second dose are highly significant (p less than 0.0001, but Pfizer probably just failed to mention that). While it is not entirely clear whether this includes any symptomatic treatment for non-serious COVID symptoms (0.2% of children had non-serious symptoms with COVID-19 after vaccination, 2.1% after placebo), it still clearly shows (even if we add 2.1% to placebo, for example) that vaccination required significantly more frequent drug therapy than COVID itself in this study.
I am not aware of the details (doses of antipyretics, duration of administration, etc.), but this increased use of drugs in the vaccinated group in this study rather undermines the notion of the benefits of vaccination over its risks !
This appears to be an attempt to make legal what is of questionable legality as applied to stifling dissent.
Considering the futility of a successful outcome for coerced vaccinations, I suspect this shows the desperation that leaderships are feeling as they venture into knowing complicity. By August, surely it dawned on many leaders and public health officials that the vaccinations had failed.
When the big reveal occurs, I think my dear senator could become known as "Klobuchar the Butcher."
What fool would put their name on such a clearly unconstitutional and corrupt bill, but a desperate fraud like her?
Toby, I think there is another component to the myocarditis risk. You have to add the people who came in under the threshold from the previous six months jab to the 3009 and to the progressive nature of myocarditis itself (Dr. Hinton's point). In fact, a patient may need three or four jabs (or nine) to reach the threshold of getting myocarditis. They have to be figured in to the equation too. Do you agree?
My comment is more so about flaws in the study design and how it introduces huge uncertainties to the data. The information I am looking at are from Pfizer’s presentation to the FDA: “Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting, October 26, 2021, FDA Briefing Document, EUA amendment request for Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for use
If you wanted to know how many people in either group (vaccine or placebo) got COVID, you would have to test everyone in each group very regularly, at least every 72 hours.
Pfizer claims that in cohort one, 3 of the 1518 participants in the vaccine group got sick and tested positive for COVID. We are told people, and especially kids, can have COVID without exhibiting symptoms. In addition, Pfizer reports that 50% (p.24) of the group had adverse reactions to the vaccine (in addition to pain at the injection site that was reported by 75% of participants). The symptoms of these adverse reactions were things like fever, headache, chills, body aches, fatigue, diarrhea, vomiting, etc. In other words, the same symptoms reported when someone gets a mild case of COVID. How many of these were COVID and how many asymptomatic cases of COVID were there in the vaccine group? They don’t know because they didn’t test them.
In the placebo group, Pfizer claims 16 kids got sick and tested positive for COVID. Again there was no regular testing. The uncertainty of these measurements is enormous.
In an ideal experiment, there would be two vaccine groups and two placebo groups. Every person in one of the vaccine groups would be exposed to the virus and no one in the other vaccine group would be exposed to the virus. Similarly for the two placebo groups. This is important for safety testing because it allows you to look at the safety of the vaccine on its own as well as in a vaccinated group that is exposed to the virus. The FDA in its guidance specifically instructs researchers to monitor for vaccine induced enhancement (p.4, Emergency Use Authorization for Vaccines to Prevent COVID-19 Guidance for Industry)
For the placebo group, this allows you to compare to controls with and without virus exposure. Understandably this cannot ethically be done on humans but the data are very important. This is why there is animal testing first. This was not done. When going to human tests, it is difficult to know how many people in each group were exposed to the virus but this is very important. You can imagine that if either group has considerably more exposure to the virus, you would reasonably expect more COVID cases in that group. Pfizer has no idea about the level of exposure to the virus for each group. One should try to minimize this problem by regularly testing all participants, by having a large sample size and by randomizing participants. Pfizer did use randomization but their sample size was small and they did not test participants.
For safety testing, the FDA’s 2020 guidelines required a minimum of six months follow up after the administration of the last dose. In May 2021, the FDA changed this to a non-binding recommendation of just two months. In Pfizer’s study for 5-11 year olds, they followed cohort one for just two months and cohort two for only 2.4 weeks (17 days, as you mentioned).
Emergency Use Authorization for Vaccines to Prevent COVID-19 Guidance for Industry
So we have a poorly designed clinical trial that produced very uncertain data that was done by the company that stands to benefit from a positive outcome of the trial. There is no independent verification, and there won’t be. The only place this is fit to publish is the journal of irreproducible results. On top of that, this lone study is done by a company that has a history of manipulating research data (The New York Times, Oct. 8, 2008, Experts Conclude Pfizer Manipulated Studies) and had to pay $2.3 billion for fraudulent marketing, the largest health care fraud settlement in the history of the Department of Justice.
One of the 4.9 % that Pfizer did not include in the research (if you can call it that ) was the girl in the wheelchair, not able to feed but through a tube, in the conference on vaccine harms by Senator Johnson. It is on Rumble, and I hope everyone watches it. By the time they got to that girl, I already had to stop looking, crying and disgusted by the government, who pushes this poison onto everyone, including little children.
Pfizer has added Tromethamine to the injections that children 5 to 11 are taking. Tromethamine is a blood acid reducer and is given to stabilize people who have had heart attacks.
Thank you for this! This is incredibly well laid-out and useful. I shared this and engaged in conversation with someone over it. They took issue with red flag no. 10 and the suggestion that the number of 5-11 year olds who die of myocarditis 5+ years after diagnosis can be extrapolated from Hinton here. His comments: "The actual mortality of viral myocarditis in children is nowhere near 50% in 5 years. He may have been citing PMID 7797779, which if you look closely, mean age is 47 years old, so clearly not children. (2)." Do you have any thoughts on this? Is myocarditis actually so rare in children that we don't have much data on 5+ year follow up in the same way we would for middle-aged adults? Is there any other data we can use to estimate how many children will die of myocarditis in this time frame?
It's curious that proponents of the disastrous status quo go through my work with a fine toothed comb but fail to review the FDA and CDC documents in a similar manner.
Pfizer, the FDA, & CDC all play fast and loose with their estimates of myocarditis.
In comments at the FDA's VRBPAC and the CDC's ACIP meetings they all state that viral myocarditis is very bad and can lead to death.
But then they turn around and say 'well, vaccine induced myocarditis is a different thing. It’s mild. Nothing to worry about.'
The fact is, no one has enough information to make that claim. The clinical trials are intentionally too short and too small and they wipe out the control group within 6 months.
Vaccine-induced myocarditis could be every bit as bad as viral myocarditis or even worse. NO ONE KNOWS. It is completely irresponsible for Pfizer, the FDA, and CDC to make claims when they do not have data to support their wishful thinking.
Even with all of this denial, the FDA risk benefit model shows that the vaccine campaign in kids 5 to 11 will produce up to 3,009 cases of myocarditis in the first 6 months.
So if it turns out that vaccine-induced myocarditis is not mild and many of these cases become fatal then we have an enormous problem on our hands.
To take that risk, given that the benefits are essentially zero in this population, is immoral.
"So when the FDA uses this tortured logic at the beginning of their briefing document, all of the calculations that stem from this will be flat out wrong. Not just wrong but preposterous and criminally wrong."
This is an excellent point. This same point applies when examining the need for a vaccine at all. Since the "covid 19 virus" has never been isolated and no specimen is available to use in vaccine production, the logic behind substituting a gene altering treatment and calling it a vaccine is also extremely tortured, if such logic is even present anywhere in the proposal for presenting this alteration of human genetic structure as a substitute for an attenuated virus vaccine is not only wrong, but preposterously and criminally wrong.
In any argument against the FDA allowing emergency use of this treatment, we must not stipulate the existence of the "disease" that creates the emergency, nor should we stipulate the classification of this dangerous treatment as a vaccine.
Until this virus has been isolated and thus proven to exist, there is no disease that justifies acceptance of the claim that there is an emergency. As it stands, this killer plague virus is entirely imaginary, and the pandemic exists only by declaration by parties who stand to benefit from the declaration of a pandemic constituting a public health emergency.
Stipulating to facts not in evidence will doom the case of any attorney defending a client in a criminal trial, just as the same act will doom any argument against this kind of preposterous claim that a "vaccine" such as this mRNA treatment should be given emergency use status.
Incredibly well written with clear thinking and excellent knowledge base.
I am very surprised and disappointed that in his quote, Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche could make the mistake of calling this a disease, rather than the sickness that it is.
How do we stop the FDA and CDC from proceeding with this?!
Parents! You CAN school your children at home. You are fully capable. And missing out on sports isn't the end of the world for them, while losing your child or the quality of his/her life is catastrophic.
The ugly truth about the 'patriotic lesser-evil' party's involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's parties:
https://healthimpactnews.com/2024/mother-who-was-sexually-trafficked-by-epstein-pedophilia-network-seeks-justice-for-her-daughter-who-was-medically-kidnapped/
(Mother Who was Sexually Trafficked by Epstein Pedophilia Network Seeks Justice for Her Daughter Who was Medically Kidnapped)
"Many of you should probably not watch this video, as it could cause you severe emotional trauma. If you have watched the documentary published by Polish film producer Patryk Vega, called “Eyes of the Devil,” and were able to handle that, then please know that Jennifer’s story is far worse."
The same courts that approved aspartame and the 1986 liability protections act: https://medicalkidnap.com/2023/12/26/u-s-supreme-court-protects-freemason-corporations-and-big-pharma-strikes-down-any-legal-opposition-to-covid-19-vaccines-and-mandates/ (U.S. Supreme Court Protects Freemason Corporations and Big Pharma – Strikes Down Any Legal Opposition to COVID-19 “Vaccines” and Mandates)
https://medicalkidnap.com/2022/10/27/has-florida-become-the-top-state-in-the-u-s-for-medical-kidnapping-and-child-trafficking/ (Has Florida Become the Top State in the U.S. for Medical Kidnapping and Child Trafficking?)
I was aware of the jyst of everything but Dang! Is any of this exposure credible in courts...?? How do we get this out there for everyone?? I'm banned on Twitter so there's that but wow mind is blown
Mr. Rogers, can you provide a link to your thesis / study of autism and vaccines please? I saw that in one of your articles and meant to look it up but then lost the tab. I would like to read it. Thanks.
I think if you reply I will get an email notice.
Oh...G-d!
Dear Toby, thank you for your work. Please tell me why is Janet Mills (Maine) on your list? Thank you very much, Mary
Could you please look at this document and tell us about it ? https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01630-0
When checking table 14 of the FDA report, there is someting extremly crazy.
Use of antipyretic medication or pain medication was 1.7 times higher (14.4% vs 8.3%) after the 1st dose of the vaccine and 2.4 times higher (19.7% vs 8.1%) after the 2nd dose than in the control group. These differences after both the first and second dose are highly significant (p less than 0.0001, but Pfizer probably just failed to mention that). While it is not entirely clear whether this includes any symptomatic treatment for non-serious COVID symptoms (0.2% of children had non-serious symptoms with COVID-19 after vaccination, 2.1% after placebo), it still clearly shows (even if we add 2.1% to placebo, for example) that vaccination required significantly more frequent drug therapy than COVID itself in this study.
I am not aware of the details (doses of antipyretics, duration of administration, etc.), but this increased use of drugs in the vaccinated group in this study rather undermines the notion of the benefits of vaccination over its risks !
Good looking out! 🙌
One has to wonder how direct Amy Klobuchar's relationship with Pfizer lobbyists is. Consider her bill, https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/2448
This appears to be an attempt to make legal what is of questionable legality as applied to stifling dissent.
Considering the futility of a successful outcome for coerced vaccinations, I suspect this shows the desperation that leaderships are feeling as they venture into knowing complicity. By August, surely it dawned on many leaders and public health officials that the vaccinations had failed.
When the big reveal occurs, I think my dear senator could become known as "Klobuchar the Butcher."
What fool would put their name on such a clearly unconstitutional and corrupt bill, but a desperate fraud like her?
Toby, I think there is another component to the myocarditis risk. You have to add the people who came in under the threshold from the previous six months jab to the 3009 and to the progressive nature of myocarditis itself (Dr. Hinton's point). In fact, a patient may need three or four jabs (or nine) to reach the threshold of getting myocarditis. They have to be figured in to the equation too. Do you agree?
My comment is more so about flaws in the study design and how it introduces huge uncertainties to the data. The information I am looking at are from Pfizer’s presentation to the FDA: “Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting, October 26, 2021, FDA Briefing Document, EUA amendment request for Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for use
in children 5 through 11 years of age”
https://www.fda.gov/media/153447/download
If you wanted to know how many people in either group (vaccine or placebo) got COVID, you would have to test everyone in each group very regularly, at least every 72 hours.
Pfizer claims that in cohort one, 3 of the 1518 participants in the vaccine group got sick and tested positive for COVID. We are told people, and especially kids, can have COVID without exhibiting symptoms. In addition, Pfizer reports that 50% (p.24) of the group had adverse reactions to the vaccine (in addition to pain at the injection site that was reported by 75% of participants). The symptoms of these adverse reactions were things like fever, headache, chills, body aches, fatigue, diarrhea, vomiting, etc. In other words, the same symptoms reported when someone gets a mild case of COVID. How many of these were COVID and how many asymptomatic cases of COVID were there in the vaccine group? They don’t know because they didn’t test them.
In the placebo group, Pfizer claims 16 kids got sick and tested positive for COVID. Again there was no regular testing. The uncertainty of these measurements is enormous.
In an ideal experiment, there would be two vaccine groups and two placebo groups. Every person in one of the vaccine groups would be exposed to the virus and no one in the other vaccine group would be exposed to the virus. Similarly for the two placebo groups. This is important for safety testing because it allows you to look at the safety of the vaccine on its own as well as in a vaccinated group that is exposed to the virus. The FDA in its guidance specifically instructs researchers to monitor for vaccine induced enhancement (p.4, Emergency Use Authorization for Vaccines to Prevent COVID-19 Guidance for Industry)
https://www.fda.gov/media/142749/download
For the placebo group, this allows you to compare to controls with and without virus exposure. Understandably this cannot ethically be done on humans but the data are very important. This is why there is animal testing first. This was not done. When going to human tests, it is difficult to know how many people in each group were exposed to the virus but this is very important. You can imagine that if either group has considerably more exposure to the virus, you would reasonably expect more COVID cases in that group. Pfizer has no idea about the level of exposure to the virus for each group. One should try to minimize this problem by regularly testing all participants, by having a large sample size and by randomizing participants. Pfizer did use randomization but their sample size was small and they did not test participants.
For safety testing, the FDA’s 2020 guidelines required a minimum of six months follow up after the administration of the last dose. In May 2021, the FDA changed this to a non-binding recommendation of just two months. In Pfizer’s study for 5-11 year olds, they followed cohort one for just two months and cohort two for only 2.4 weeks (17 days, as you mentioned).
Emergency Use Authorization for Vaccines to Prevent COVID-19 Guidance for Industry
https://www.fda.gov/media/142749/download
So we have a poorly designed clinical trial that produced very uncertain data that was done by the company that stands to benefit from a positive outcome of the trial. There is no independent verification, and there won’t be. The only place this is fit to publish is the journal of irreproducible results. On top of that, this lone study is done by a company that has a history of manipulating research data (The New York Times, Oct. 8, 2008, Experts Conclude Pfizer Manipulated Studies) and had to pay $2.3 billion for fraudulent marketing, the largest health care fraud settlement in the history of the Department of Justice.
Fantastic points!!! 🙌 Thank you!!!
One of the 4.9 % that Pfizer did not include in the research (if you can call it that ) was the girl in the wheelchair, not able to feed but through a tube, in the conference on vaccine harms by Senator Johnson. It is on Rumble, and I hope everyone watches it. By the time they got to that girl, I already had to stop looking, crying and disgusted by the government, who pushes this poison onto everyone, including little children.
Pfizer has added Tromethamine to the injections that children 5 to 11 are taking. Tromethamine is a blood acid reducer and is given to stabilize people who have had heart attacks.
Thank you for this! This is incredibly well laid-out and useful. I shared this and engaged in conversation with someone over it. They took issue with red flag no. 10 and the suggestion that the number of 5-11 year olds who die of myocarditis 5+ years after diagnosis can be extrapolated from Hinton here. His comments: "The actual mortality of viral myocarditis in children is nowhere near 50% in 5 years. He may have been citing PMID 7797779, which if you look closely, mean age is 47 years old, so clearly not children. (2)." Do you have any thoughts on this? Is myocarditis actually so rare in children that we don't have much data on 5+ year follow up in the same way we would for middle-aged adults? Is there any other data we can use to estimate how many children will die of myocarditis in this time frame?
It's curious that proponents of the disastrous status quo go through my work with a fine toothed comb but fail to review the FDA and CDC documents in a similar manner.
Pfizer, the FDA, & CDC all play fast and loose with their estimates of myocarditis.
In comments at the FDA's VRBPAC and the CDC's ACIP meetings they all state that viral myocarditis is very bad and can lead to death.
But then they turn around and say 'well, vaccine induced myocarditis is a different thing. It’s mild. Nothing to worry about.'
The fact is, no one has enough information to make that claim. The clinical trials are intentionally too short and too small and they wipe out the control group within 6 months.
Vaccine-induced myocarditis could be every bit as bad as viral myocarditis or even worse. NO ONE KNOWS. It is completely irresponsible for Pfizer, the FDA, and CDC to make claims when they do not have data to support their wishful thinking.
Even with all of this denial, the FDA risk benefit model shows that the vaccine campaign in kids 5 to 11 will produce up to 3,009 cases of myocarditis in the first 6 months.
So if it turns out that vaccine-induced myocarditis is not mild and many of these cases become fatal then we have an enormous problem on our hands.
To take that risk, given that the benefits are essentially zero in this population, is immoral.
Great work. I have some questions I would like to see them attempt to answer. https://joesheehan.substack.com/p/dosing-our-kids
As Mr. Rogers wrote:
"So when the FDA uses this tortured logic at the beginning of their briefing document, all of the calculations that stem from this will be flat out wrong. Not just wrong but preposterous and criminally wrong."
This is an excellent point. This same point applies when examining the need for a vaccine at all. Since the "covid 19 virus" has never been isolated and no specimen is available to use in vaccine production, the logic behind substituting a gene altering treatment and calling it a vaccine is also extremely tortured, if such logic is even present anywhere in the proposal for presenting this alteration of human genetic structure as a substitute for an attenuated virus vaccine is not only wrong, but preposterously and criminally wrong.
In any argument against the FDA allowing emergency use of this treatment, we must not stipulate the existence of the "disease" that creates the emergency, nor should we stipulate the classification of this dangerous treatment as a vaccine.
Until this virus has been isolated and thus proven to exist, there is no disease that justifies acceptance of the claim that there is an emergency. As it stands, this killer plague virus is entirely imaginary, and the pandemic exists only by declaration by parties who stand to benefit from the declaration of a pandemic constituting a public health emergency.
Stipulating to facts not in evidence will doom the case of any attorney defending a client in a criminal trial, just as the same act will doom any argument against this kind of preposterous claim that a "vaccine" such as this mRNA treatment should be given emergency use status.
Incredibly well written with clear thinking and excellent knowledge base.
I am very surprised and disappointed that in his quote, Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche could make the mistake of calling this a disease, rather than the sickness that it is.
How do we stop the FDA and CDC from proceeding with this?!
Parents! You CAN school your children at home. You are fully capable. And missing out on sports isn't the end of the world for them, while losing your child or the quality of his/her life is catastrophic.