315 Comments
User's avatar
Kristi Northway's avatar

Dearest Toby, you are genius in your critic of the oral "arguments" presented. Everyone, e v e r y o n e, tiptoed around the elephant in the room but the horror of that is that most don't even know the elephant is there at all. We are a nation hurdling fast toward an all out revolution. May God help us as we fight for freedom. Thank you for your keen insights. Keep 'em coming. We need to get you back to Iowa where we are still red-ish.

Expand full comment
Nicholai Zharzov's avatar

IF Government can mandate injections today they can mandate lobotomies tomorrow. It's not a far stretch at all.

Where censorship is online today, lobotomies will be censorship offline tomorrow. Believe the narrative or else!

We know they are lying.

They know they are lying.

They know that we know they are lying.

We know that they know we know they are lying.

And still they continue to lie.

— Alexander Solzhenitsyn

Expand full comment
Nicholai Zharzov's avatar

"Wolf is so flummoxed by the total evaporation of all principles, values, and capacity for logical reasoning on the left when it comes to vaccines that by the end of the article she is searching for supernatural explanations for the levels of evil we are experiencing."

and indeed, we all should because, THAT is what it is. It is pure evil and has to be called for what it is.

America has consciously and purposefully removed God from all aspects of public life including the constitution.

Maybe, it's finally time to recognise this and change? It starts with me and you.

Expand full comment
friesdan's avatar

Thanks for the summary Toby. I could only listen to about half an hour of it. Aside from the ignorance of the issues, what really struck me were the condescending, authoritarian overtones in the liberal justices' voices as they compared seatbelts to vaccines. They were emotional, agitated, and full of a tyrannical, existential fear, like that of a paranoid king who must keep killing potentially tratiorus subjects in order to sleep - but each morning wakes up more paranoid.

Expand full comment
CRC's avatar

There are physicians who will not be able to practice medicine if the CMS mandate is upheld. I don’t recall anything about my obligation to commit suicide in the Hippocratic Oath.

Expand full comment
¡Andrew the Great!'s avatar

Cannot thank you enough for the link to Naomi Wolf's Substack column. That is magnificent. A worthy "save" for later use and reference.

And your post here ain't chopped liver, either!

Expand full comment
Jimychanga's avatar

Endless Murder - Three Year Old Girl Dies Of A

Heart Attack One Day After Receiving Jab

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/three-year-old-girl-dies-of-a-heart-attack-one-day-after-receiving-covid-19-jab/

Expand full comment
Jimychanga's avatar

Experts "distraught". Listen Carefully!

“The Numbers Killed by these Vaccines is Much Worse than What We Thought”. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Dr. Mike Yeadon

https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-numbers-killed-by-these-vaccines-is-much-worse-than-what-we-thought-dr-sucharit-bhakdi-mike-yeadon/5765883

Expand full comment
IndianaNurse's avatar

As a mother of a profoundly vaccine injured son, and the nurse that gave my profoundly injured son that unavoidably unsafe "vaccine", I want to say I appreciate all you do. I am too tired this evening to contribute much to this discussion right now but I wanted to tell you how much I appreciate you and I pray God of heaven and earth prospers you and subdues these evil enemies.

Expand full comment
Toby Rogers's avatar

Thank you for your kind message. It's not your fault. You were lied to. Justice is coming, we just gotta keep the faith. Blessings to you and your son. 🙏

Expand full comment
Cathy's avatar

Toby please don't despair bc you and others have reached so many people that the old guards plan is not working. Also, your posts above all others keep me sane as they are impeccably researched, beautifully written and infused with humanity rather than partisan politics. This is nothing but my opinion but I would bet scotus threads the needle by saying the 1900 ish Massachusetts Small Pox ruling allows for the mandates but that Covid does not meet the threshold. This is a small win as it signals they know they have lost the narrative so they lift the boot a little yet they have forever enshrined the right, based on a bogus single precedent, to subject citizens to this tyranny in the future. What they aren't recognizing is that you and others have informed so many people that I believe it is game over and the only question left is does it progress to a visible war. The SC was bought and sold in 2000. They trampled all over separation of powers by stopping a recount and selecting a president. Then they saddled us with Citizens United and the list goes on. I don't know a great deal about scotus but wasn't Anthony Kennedy a true constitutionalist jurist? Supposedly he resigned after selecting his clerks etc.. and we conveniently get the SC that seems was selected to do the bidding we are now seeing... no different from O'bama's appointments. They got neoliberals riled up over Coney Barret intentionally as they always do. They pedal a boogey man narrative regarding her religion etc but with the little bit of research I did it looked like her record landed her in the same neocon/neolib corporate/oligarch group. They are far from the best and the brightest. Thanks to people like you their robes and pedestal soon will convey Oz rather than reverence.

Expand full comment
Don Bailey's avatar

One question that should have been asked: Where and how in the Constitution does it allow any unelected federal bureaucrat or department like HHS, OSHA or CMMS to mandate anything that requires medical intervention using an experimental gene therapy that is known to have caused more than 20k deaths with no long-term efficacy or safety trials and that has no FDA approval and provides complete protection from all liability to the responsible parties without free and informed consent, or else lose your life, liberty and pursuit of happiness??

Expand full comment
Jimychanga's avatar

Watch carefully. They are going to flip the script and blame TRUMP for the Vaccine Holocaust. https://vaccinewars.com/2022-01-05-life-insurance-companies-sound-death-alert-warnings-over-excess-deaths-covid-2.html#

Expand full comment
Jimychanga's avatar

Ask your Doctor if Nature is right for you..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bf5TgVRGND4

Expand full comment
Randy Kleine's avatar

I have forwarded Toby's article to Congressman Brad Wenstrup (R-OH) and my local Ohio State Representatives.

Expand full comment
Toby Rogers's avatar

Thank you Randy! 🙌

Expand full comment
Lise McLain's avatar

Hi!

Even though it was depressing for you to write your article pertaining to the oral arguments in front of the supreme court, it was very insightful, and I enjoyed reading it. I also read it to my husband to show him that you "get it." Maybe he learned something.

To be clear I did not listen to the arguments.

First of all, justices do NOT make laws and do NOT control the purse strings so, therefore, the Judicial Department is the "weakest" of the three (3) departments of government.

Second, the justices ONLY voice an "opinion," and it is "just" an opinion. That's it. Nothing else.

NO one has to abide by their "opinion." It has NO "force and effect" of law.

This is lost on most people.

Third, justices MUST follow the Constitution, but do they? NO!

Here is one example: Examine the abortion issue. Where in the Constitution does it address abortion? No where! Abortion is NOT a private issue = bedroom privacy, for instance. Someone kills the life of the unborn in some clinic/hospital. There is a "loser" and a "winner.

It is NOT up to the justices to decide who wins and who loses especially their lives. Does the mother have a right to participate in killing her child? NO! Killing is a crime. No where in the Constitution does it say that a mother can kill her child. Abortion is NOT even mentioned.

Fourth, government does NOT have the delegation of authority to decide losers and winners.

Fifth, examine your own state constitution. Mine in Maine says in Article 1, Section 2 that "all power is inherent in the people." Take notice that it does NOT say that "some" power is inherent in the people, and some power is inherent in the state. It says "all." That means every bit of it belongs to the people. In Article 1, Section 1 it states that the people have a right to possess, acquire and defend property.

Isn't your body yours ONLY? If not, then you are a slave.

Hope this helps.

Thank you!

Lise from Maine (former licensed clinician)

Expand full comment
Randy Kleine's avatar

I am in awe of this article by Toby Rogers.

Expand full comment