The shot made no difference against Covid but it does cause myocarditis and came with a 15% to 17% overall adverse event rate. Meanwhile the CDC admits 74% of kids already have natural immunity.
Thank you for clearly documenting this atrocity. Sorry, if I overlooked this but could you let me know where I can find a link to the protocol that says a trip to the ER could be censored from the trial if the investigators are not contacted first?
The FDA’s top vaccine leader told a congressional committee on Friday afternoon that although the adult vaccines had to meet a 50% threshold for efficacy against Covid-19 infections, that same standard will not need to be met for the vaccines for the youngest group of children, for which a vaccine is not yet available.
[...] According to a readout of the meeting from the House select subcommittee on the coronavirus crisis, Marks explained that the FDA would not withhold authorization — despite previous guidance — for a pediatric vaccine solely because it did not reach a 50% efficacy threshold at blocking symptomatic infections. All of the other adult and children’s vaccines currently authorized in the US have lost significant amounts of efficacy due to the Omicron variant, but they still remain effective at reducing the risk of severe disease, hospitalization and death.
“If these vaccines seem to be mirroring efficacy in adults and just seem to be less effective against Omicron like they are for adults, we will probably still authorize,” Marks said.
**
How can they "protect against severe disease and death" in children younger than five when these kids aren't dying? And 75% of them (probably more) have already had the "disease"? Going to bang my head on the wall for a while.
The brazenness of Murderna (and Shizer) is something to behold. They know there will be no accountability from current administrations so push and push the limits with what they can get away with.
Thanks Toby! It's incredible that they can't even make something up for these kids trials. I wonder how parents feel about their kids getting side effects in the trial...
There is only one reason, beside money, for this insane push to get this into babies. To completely destroy the human genome and wipe out humanity. We already know that reverse transcriptase occurs with liver cells. Infants have high amounts of fetal stem cells to get programmed with spike protein generating DNA. Cancer, infertility, VAIDS, heart failure from the myocarditis. Complete and total catastrophe if these get approved for infants. But, hey when you are already responsible for the greatest medical catastrophe of all time then why not shoot for the moon?
Toby, isn’t Pfizer’s adult shot dose a 30 mcg dose (not 25mg)? Minor thing, it’s still almost 4 times less than Moderna’s 100mcg dose for adults, but want to send this around and don’t want people questioning the accuracy of the doses. Thanks! Love your work.
Thank you, Toby. What a great job you've done summarizing this insanity.
Is it time to finally start calling our nation's "public health professionals" what they truly are? Because I know so many of us are thinking it. They are TERRORISTS. That is not hyperbole. It is a provable fact with mountains of evidence now to back it up. They are killing and maiming in the name of their religion. They have rejected the one true God and instead worship false gods at the Church of the Immaculate Vaccination. The world's children are their pagan sacrifice.
Thanks, Toby. We absolutely need to continue contacting the FDA and urging them NOT to bow to political pressure to authorize an unnecessary product. Even though I tend to be in denial about it, we can't forget that there are a number of parents out there ("Protect Their Future") who are organizing and putting pressure in the opposite direction, Chicken Littles and Ducky Luckies and Cocky Lockies who are acting like the main holdup here is "bureaucratic red tape" and people who don't care about our youngest children (!). (Not sure about the history of this group and who ACTUALLY started it, but I know enough people who believe this is the social justice issue of the moment to believe it's real.)
There is, of course, the issue of quality and potency validation. No one has ever talked about how many copies of mRNA are supposed to be in each dose. It's always phrased in terms of micrograms (and I recall one FDA email saying "milligrams" instead of "micrograms" ... I guess you really don't need to know anything to work there).
It's like the mercury in the old multi-dose shots and the shaking-the-OJ metaphor. Who gets a bit more than the others? How can we control for that? Is anybody checking? But in this case, there's not even a pretense that we know. I have not seen anywhere how many copies of mRNA are *supposed to be* in each dose (for any age group, for either vendor). So how are these manufacturers complying with B.2.e. on page 11 of the linked document?
And then there's the FDA's pesky (non-binding, of course) request for biodistribution studies (C.2.a. on page 13). I've seen the Japanese one and the English translation, as well as reading a bit of commentary from Dr. Byram Bridle on both versions. I don't know... Is saturating a kid's (or even an adult's) ovaries with lipid nanoparticles encapsulating spike-protein-generation-inducing mRNA a good plan? Does FDA plan to concern itself with this, or will they just let Sara Oliver and Keipp Talbot BS us in their creepy evil-Barbie voices?
So: You're right, Toby, once again. And in even more ways than you might have noticed.
As someone wisely said recently, those who control the trials control the outcomes. Even so, it is a dreadful comedy to watch as they walk their numbers up around that 50% goal, and do so with impunity. The fact that these genetic treatments are even being approved under vaccine protocols is beyond understanding. These are so clearly not vaccines. They may be a computer programmer's wet dream, but they are not vaccines.
Moderna and Pfizer both have the same unresolvable problem. If they cut the dose too much it has no effect and if they put too much mRNA in they get horrible side effects. They are searching for a sweet spot in the middle but there is no sweet spot in this population (under 6) because the weight of little ones varies and changes so much and their immune systems are still developing. Moderna, Pfizer, the FDA, and CDC lie because there is no way to get this product across the line if they tell the truth.
May 1, 2022·edited May 1, 2022Liked by Toby Rogers
The mRNA drugs program cells in your body to produce the foreign spike protein. The immune system sees the foreign spike protein and builds immunity to it. That is a very singular, narrow explanation of the mRNA modality that completely overlooks other immune responses, not the least of which is that any cell producing foreign toxins is also identified as a foreign cell and the immune response is to destroy that cell and build a memory for it. This means that not only is the immune system building immunity to the spike protein, but also to the cells in our body that produce it. Our immune system is trained to kill our own cells, if they contain the mRNA software. This is a key difference between these mRNA drugs and traditional vaccines. Therefor, the actual modality of the mRNA drugs is "auto-immune induced immunity" which is a very bad idea.
Thank you for clearly documenting this atrocity. Sorry, if I overlooked this but could you let me know where I can find a link to the protocol that says a trip to the ER could be censored from the trial if the investigators are not contacted first?
Ah, good times. Making a "vaccine" is like being a weatherman: You can be wrong all the time and still get paid.
https://endpts.com/fdas-peter-marks-to-congress-youngest-kids-vaccine-wont-need-to-hit-50-efficacy-mark/
The FDA’s top vaccine leader told a congressional committee on Friday afternoon that although the adult vaccines had to meet a 50% threshold for efficacy against Covid-19 infections, that same standard will not need to be met for the vaccines for the youngest group of children, for which a vaccine is not yet available.
[...] According to a readout of the meeting from the House select subcommittee on the coronavirus crisis, Marks explained that the FDA would not withhold authorization — despite previous guidance — for a pediatric vaccine solely because it did not reach a 50% efficacy threshold at blocking symptomatic infections. All of the other adult and children’s vaccines currently authorized in the US have lost significant amounts of efficacy due to the Omicron variant, but they still remain effective at reducing the risk of severe disease, hospitalization and death.
“If these vaccines seem to be mirroring efficacy in adults and just seem to be less effective against Omicron like they are for adults, we will probably still authorize,” Marks said.
**
How can they "protect against severe disease and death" in children younger than five when these kids aren't dying? And 75% of them (probably more) have already had the "disease"? Going to bang my head on the wall for a while.
The brazenness of Murderna (and Shizer) is something to behold. They know there will be no accountability from current administrations so push and push the limits with what they can get away with.
Thanks Toby! It's incredible that they can't even make something up for these kids trials. I wonder how parents feel about their kids getting side effects in the trial...
Thanks for the amazing write-up! Will share. The napkin notes, though... I thought those were only for writing exemptions? 🧐😂
Toby,
thanks so much for all you do…
the best I can do is make the few followers I have on Twitter aware of your writings…even tagged Elon to bring you back…
bought a subscription for your service…I hope this helps and keeps you going…don’t give up!.
There is only one reason, beside money, for this insane push to get this into babies. To completely destroy the human genome and wipe out humanity. We already know that reverse transcriptase occurs with liver cells. Infants have high amounts of fetal stem cells to get programmed with spike protein generating DNA. Cancer, infertility, VAIDS, heart failure from the myocarditis. Complete and total catastrophe if these get approved for infants. But, hey when you are already responsible for the greatest medical catastrophe of all time then why not shoot for the moon?
Toby, isn’t Pfizer’s adult shot dose a 30 mcg dose (not 25mg)? Minor thing, it’s still almost 4 times less than Moderna’s 100mcg dose for adults, but want to send this around and don’t want people questioning the accuracy of the doses. Thanks! Love your work.
Thank you, Toby. What a great job you've done summarizing this insanity.
Is it time to finally start calling our nation's "public health professionals" what they truly are? Because I know so many of us are thinking it. They are TERRORISTS. That is not hyperbole. It is a provable fact with mountains of evidence now to back it up. They are killing and maiming in the name of their religion. They have rejected the one true God and instead worship false gods at the Church of the Immaculate Vaccination. The world's children are their pagan sacrifice.
Thanks, Toby. We absolutely need to continue contacting the FDA and urging them NOT to bow to political pressure to authorize an unnecessary product. Even though I tend to be in denial about it, we can't forget that there are a number of parents out there ("Protect Their Future") who are organizing and putting pressure in the opposite direction, Chicken Littles and Ducky Luckies and Cocky Lockies who are acting like the main holdup here is "bureaucratic red tape" and people who don't care about our youngest children (!). (Not sure about the history of this group and who ACTUALLY started it, but I know enough people who believe this is the social justice issue of the moment to believe it's real.)
Should be called "Immunobribing"
FDA was always OK with crummy efficacy. The guidelines (these are the revised ones, but the original ones were the same in this respect: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/emergency-use-authorization-vaccines-prevent-covid-19) said 50% efficacy, with a wide enough confidence interval that 30% efficacy would be OK. I kid you not (p. 13 of 31).
There is, of course, the issue of quality and potency validation. No one has ever talked about how many copies of mRNA are supposed to be in each dose. It's always phrased in terms of micrograms (and I recall one FDA email saying "milligrams" instead of "micrograms" ... I guess you really don't need to know anything to work there).
It's like the mercury in the old multi-dose shots and the shaking-the-OJ metaphor. Who gets a bit more than the others? How can we control for that? Is anybody checking? But in this case, there's not even a pretense that we know. I have not seen anywhere how many copies of mRNA are *supposed to be* in each dose (for any age group, for either vendor). So how are these manufacturers complying with B.2.e. on page 11 of the linked document?
And then there's the FDA's pesky (non-binding, of course) request for biodistribution studies (C.2.a. on page 13). I've seen the Japanese one and the English translation, as well as reading a bit of commentary from Dr. Byram Bridle on both versions. I don't know... Is saturating a kid's (or even an adult's) ovaries with lipid nanoparticles encapsulating spike-protein-generation-inducing mRNA a good plan? Does FDA plan to concern itself with this, or will they just let Sara Oliver and Keipp Talbot BS us in their creepy evil-Barbie voices?
So: You're right, Toby, once again. And in even more ways than you might have noticed.
As someone wisely said recently, those who control the trials control the outcomes. Even so, it is a dreadful comedy to watch as they walk their numbers up around that 50% goal, and do so with impunity. The fact that these genetic treatments are even being approved under vaccine protocols is beyond understanding. These are so clearly not vaccines. They may be a computer programmer's wet dream, but they are not vaccines.
Moderna and Pfizer both have the same unresolvable problem. If they cut the dose too much it has no effect and if they put too much mRNA in they get horrible side effects. They are searching for a sweet spot in the middle but there is no sweet spot in this population (under 6) because the weight of little ones varies and changes so much and their immune systems are still developing. Moderna, Pfizer, the FDA, and CDC lie because there is no way to get this product across the line if they tell the truth.
They might die, but it could be worse..
The mRNA drugs program cells in your body to produce the foreign spike protein. The immune system sees the foreign spike protein and builds immunity to it. That is a very singular, narrow explanation of the mRNA modality that completely overlooks other immune responses, not the least of which is that any cell producing foreign toxins is also identified as a foreign cell and the immune response is to destroy that cell and build a memory for it. This means that not only is the immune system building immunity to the spike protein, but also to the cells in our body that produce it. Our immune system is trained to kill our own cells, if they contain the mRNA software. This is a key difference between these mRNA drugs and traditional vaccines. Therefor, the actual modality of the mRNA drugs is "auto-immune induced immunity" which is a very bad idea.