Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Toby Rogers's avatar

If their product is so great, why are the clinical trials so shoddy and the regulatory process so riddled with shortcuts and deception?

Expand full comment
Space Hamster Boo's avatar

The antibody count argument they've been using is truly shocking. They used the same inanity to "prove" natural immunity doesn't exist. A first year A&P student should know better than that. The body doesn't keep huge numbers of antibodies around for everything you've ever encountered. Blood would be like molasses. Their argument is so absurd it's not even wrong.

It's like answering the question "what color is the ocean?" with "fuzzy".

Expand full comment
50 more comments...

No posts