327 Comments
Jan 18Liked by Toby Rogers

Bentonite clay baths and charcoal soap reduce/lessen greatly my meltdown severity and learning disabilities, growing up with profound-moderate autism myself. But I had a major crying meltdown today, from my angry wheelchair-bound mom scolding me over a sensory meltdown (over food that smelled gross to me).

Expand full comment
Jan 16Liked by Toby Rogers

Great article!!! I just found this article written by a health warrior in Australia, Eve Hillary, all the way back in 2003 , I wonder if you know of her? https://www.safecom.org.au/pan-recall.htm

Expand full comment

When highly regarded and much published George Waldbott, MD found he couldn't get any of his papers or research published relevant to fluoride toxicity, he founded his own science journal. PubMed blacklists "Fluoride Research" but it still provides an outlet for that topic. https://www.fluorideresearch.org/ Perhaps we need something similar for vaccine science.

ResearchGate https://www.researchgate.net/ and Academia https://www.academia.edu/ are other options, although "Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law" seems an excellent choice.

Expand full comment

Well done, thank you.

Expand full comment

I would not conflate the solutions with the elections of any one candidate, especially considering the candidates you mention may be good on one or two issues but are wholly destructive on others. Genuinely successfully activism, throughout history, involves putting consistent pressure on whoever's in office. That's what's given us whatever rights and freedoms we had to fight for. They're never handed to us by corrupted politicians, and Kennedy and DeSantis are both heavily compromised (and actually deranged on a whole range of issues). As much as I applaud their positions on the Covid hysteria, I have zero faith in either of them as saviours of humanity.

Expand full comment
Jan 8·edited Jan 8

Seems like there's the same issue with cancer research. The big dollars are aligned with the genetic theory and it's high priced solutions vs the metabolic theory with low cost solutions like cutting out carbs/sugars and fasting. Real solutions cut into profits and end grants for research.

Expand full comment

Wow. Toby I salute you for your tenacity. I can see you have integrity.

Big Pharma is powerful and they have so many tentacles, but you and many others are chopping them off. I doubt that Big Pharma has the potential to regenerate those chopped off. Virology is dying for sure, and vaccines will die off too.

Expand full comment

The paradox is always what people need to know about, when it has to do with a market run by greed, selfishness and ignorance. If only humanity could see that. But instead they go goo-eyed--like over Bill Gates--for the rogues who throw their money about with attractive tentacles.

Expand full comment

Toby, another job well done. Since the first time I heard you speak on The Highwire, I felt you were a man to take on the behemoth and win.

Expand full comment

Keep fighting the good fight. You're being heard.

Expand full comment

Toby, this is just like embryonic stem cell research.

Stem cells from one person won’t work in another person. This is known, and has been known for a long time. However taking stem cells from someone and injecting them back into that same person does work. Embryonic stem cell research was important only in finding out how those cells reproduce and function. But the big fight was over embryonic stem cell research for cures. The private sector had long since abandoned the need for further embryonic stem cell research, because it was found to be a dead end.

But many scientists were busy trying to convince politicians and those in government, that embryonic stem cell research is a gold mine. It’s fraud. However; those scientists knew that they could get paid for life -- studying something that they already knew would lead to nothing, it’s job security.

Pharma is just echoing the same old lines. "Trust us, because we know better than you do. We can make your immune system better than what God intended, if you just let us." Think about that for a minute, because that’s the absolute root of all of this!

Expand full comment
Jan 6Liked by Toby Rogers

As a person on the spectrum who has done a lot of research, and paying particular attention to those who do not appear to have an ax to grind, I think that both sides in the issue you were discussing here have got a piece of the truth and are running with it as if it is the whole truth.

I would say that Autism is initiated by hundreds of slightly defective genes, and is greatly exacerbated by things like vaccines, Tylenol, other drugs, and various chemical pollutants in the environment. But you have to start with many defective genes to be easily affected by the chemicals in the environment.

Expand full comment

My understanding is that autistic children/people have, on average, 72 "de novo" genetic mutations. "De novo" means new -- that the genetic mutations never existed in the family line before and are showing up for the first time in the children who have them. The medical establishment will tell you these mutations are "spontaneous". But there is nothing spontaneous about them. They are RADIATION-INDUCED genetic mutations caused by 1 of 2 things. Either the baby was exposed in early pregnancy to radiation (ultrasonic and/or wireless), and/or the parents' sperm or egg are genetically damaged from exposure to wireless and/or ultrasonic radiation.

Expand full comment

Approximately 45 years after x-rays were first used in hospitals, Autism was first observed by Kanner and Asperger. Ultrasound did not come into use until much later.

Expand full comment

Ultrasound was mainstreamed into obstetrics in the 1970s. This is when autism rates started to go up and they have not stopped since. In 1970, we are told there was 1 autism case in 10,000. Now, we have 1 in 28 boys diagnosed with autism. The medical establishment IS the driving force behind this epidemic and everyone needs to become aware of this.

The medical establishment lost their ability to use x-rays during pregnancy thanks to the work of Rosalie Bertell (and others) who exposed the dangers of this technology. So they had to find another way to do "fetal surveillance" (their term, not mine), and decided to use ultrasound. Of course, lab-generated radiation, such as that coming from x-ray and ultrasound machines, can be lethal and is causing all kinds of havoc for developing babies.

As for the "weak genome" in the parents -- in fact, autistic children have, on average, 72 "de novo" genetic mutations. De novo means new -- the genetic mutations never existed in the family line before and are showing up for the first time in the children who have them. There are two possible ways these mutations are occurring -- either through in utero radiation exposure (from ultrasound or wireless devices) and/or through genetic damage to the sperm and/or egg of the parents from radiation exposure (either ultrasonic or wireless). Either way, the genetic mutations are RADIATION INDUCED.

Expand full comment

I don’t dispute what you’re saying. But my point is that I believe that the reason why some people get autism and others are unaffected given the same exposure to ultrasound sound or whatever, is that those who have NEW gene damage do so because their bodies are assaulted by ultrasound or radiation or chemicals, etc. But they get the new gene damage and are made autistic by those assaults because they start with an inherited weak genome. Those who start with a robust genome are unaffected.

Expand full comment

I don't think you are correct. I think all babies are negatively affected by the technology, but in different ways . Some will develop infertility and/or sterility. Some will have fetal growth retardation and low birth weight. Some will develop brain damage, heart damage, bone deformations, immune system malfunction, etc. Some will get cancer. Some will have hearing or vision problems. And many, many will have ADHD and other expressions of neurological overload. You would need to read my book to fully understand the extent of the damage being done by this radiation, some of which will not make itself known for 15-20 years (such as infertility).

I encourage you to read this study by Dr. Roland Guenther to get a full idea of what the babies are experiencing when they are exposed to ultrasound in utero. We are severely harming them by doing this: https://birthofanewearth.substack.com/p/homeopathic-remedy-for-the-healing

Expand full comment

I may have been being hyperbolic when I said “unaffected”, but I do believe that there are a great many people who seem to be almost superhuman, compared to me at least, who live their lives with no evidence of any deficits. They have great success in all areas of life, live to be 110 and don’t appear to have been negatively impacted by anything. I believe there are a great many people like this who have been exposed to all kinds of the same ultrasound and chemicals that others have. So, if there was a negative impact on them, it was not relatively significant.

Expand full comment

It seems that all the evidence points to there being a weak genome in the parents, which is then assaulted by one or more significant offenders. This can result in some level of autism which may or may not have already been expressed in the parents weak genome.

Expand full comment

And a stark betrayal to their oath: Do no harm.

Expand full comment
Jan 6·edited Jan 6Liked by Toby Rogers

This problem of children being neurologically damaged will not go away until we confront what is actually the driving force of this epidemic... PRENATAL ULTRASOUND! Ultrasonic irradiation in utero is wreaking havoc with the genetics, fertility, and neurology of developing babies. It is causing massive heating, leading to numerous birth defects as well as miscarriage, premature birth and fetal demise. This radiation -- that we have been told is "just sound waves" -- is also causing brain damage, hearing damage, fetal growth retardation, low birth weight, damage to the immune system, cancers of all kinds (including brain tumors in infants and very young children), delayed speech, fetal abnormalities, bone deformations, and much, much more. There are many hundreds of studies that I have cited in my book on this topic to back up what I am saying here. And BTW - ultrasound blows holes in the blood brain barrier, allowing vaccine poisons to travel right into the brains of these children. And mothers are being repeatedly "vaccinated" (i.e., POISONED) during pregnancy. This is a "perfect storm" deliberately designed by the powers-that-shouldn't-be to destroy the children. And it is time for people to wake up to this fact.

Please check out my book which, of course, has been banned by Amazon and is now only available on my website: https://birthofanewearth.com/2019/04/the-dark-side-of-prenatal-ultrasound/

I repeat, if we want autism to stop, we need to address the root cause. Autism started in the 1970s when ultrasound was first mainstreamed into obstetrics. This is not a coincidence. Let's pay attention to the elephant in the living room that everyone seems to prefer ignoring.

Please also watch my interview with Polly Tommey and friends at Children's Health Defense about this topic: https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/tea-time/the-dark-side-of-ultrasound/

Expand full comment
Jan 6Liked by Toby Rogers

Dealing with the Simons Fdn., and other such outfits that use censorship as a tool to allay their fear of truth, sounds a lot like playing chess with a pigeon: he knocks over all the pieces, craps all over the board, and then struts around like he won.

I can only hope these charlatans get what's coming to them..."their foot shall slide in due time." Deut. 32:35

Expand full comment

I love the first paragraph! As to the charlatans, amen.

"He who digs a pit will fall into it, and he who rolls a stone will have it roll back on him." Proverbs 26:27

Charlatans anagrams to 'larch Satan'

Expand full comment

I've read your paper! When you refer a "Prevention scenario" I can't find any factual indicators that might explain the "Prevention" success.

Via the references I found this gem:

"That analysis indicates that the annual rate in growth of autism prevalence among privately-insured whites indeed slowed down," (Pearl et al. 2019).

I can assume that we can keep jabbing kids as long as a private insurance (a good one!) is paid! Capitalism at its best...

So it seems that a clear reference to what environmental factors can help reduce the rate of ASD like suggested in Figure 1. would be nice! Without those the Yellow line appears to be just another computer modelling of fairy wishful hoping!

Expand full comment