Are Bill Gates and the Biowarfare Junta trying to erase humanness itself?
Did they take a religious problem and convert it into a molecular one?
It seems to me that the writers of the Bible were wrestling with the following problem (stemming from three interrelated human characteristics that separate us from all other animals):
We are conscious of our own mortality;
We know the difference between good and evil; and
Human society is almost always wicked.
That’s the paradox at the heart of Christianity. We are conscious of our own mortality and that brings with it existential dread (Genesis). We personally know the right thing to do going back to the Garden of Eden (also Genesis). Yet societies are almost universally wicked as evidenced by everything in the Bible (including the murder of the Messiah by the state with the blessing of the mob) and the history of “civilization”.
And the Bible solves for each of these problems. It argues that we chose our misery through disobedience to God. But we can be reborn and achieve eternal life through Jesus’ life, death, and resurrection.
Most of my readers know this narrative better than I do.
But here’s why I bring this up. Consciousness, the knowledge of right and wrong, and the propensity for sinfulness have to be rooted in some physical structure of our brain. By now I feel like most people, including most Christians, accept the idea that humanity didn’t just land on Earth as fully-formed modern people. But that means that we likely evolved from the primordial sea. In which case we must have developed consciousness, ethics, and sinfulness through random variation in biological reproduction and viruses interacting and exchanging genetic material with animals (that, over billions of years, became what we know of as humans today).
So I’m basically the opposite of Team Viruses Don’t Exist. I’m Team Viruses Drive Human Evolution.
Viruses are everywhere. There are a quadrillion x quadrillion (10 nonillion = 10 to the 31st power) individual viruses on Earth — 100 million times more viruses on Earth than stars in the sky. And only about 200 of those contribute to disease in humans (so, contrary to popular belief, viruses as a class are surprisingly bad at killing us). The 10 nonillion minus 200 viruses that don’t kill us function as a sort of divine scratch pad for working out new models of life.
What most popular accounts of viruses miss is the beneficial exchange between viruses and animals throughout history. As Katherine Wu writes in National Geographic:
Viruses infiltrate every aspect of our natural world, seething in seawater, drifting through the atmosphere, and lurking in miniscule motes of soil. Generally considered non-living entities, these pathogens can only replicate with the help of a host, and they are capable of hijacking organisms from every branch of the tree of life — including a multitude of human cells.
In this interaction between humans and viruses sometimes bits of the viral genetic material are incorporated into the human genome and passed on to the next generation.
Even the BBC states, “Without viruses, humans could not have evolved.”
Estimates vary as to how much of the human genome originally came from viruses. Cold Springs Harbor Laboratory (usually busy with developing gain-of-function bioweapons) estimates that 8% to 40% of the human genome originally came from viruses. The NY Times also cites the 8% figure. This article claims that “40 to 80 percent of the human genome arrived from some archaic viral invasion” (citing a study in Current Opinion in Microbiology).
And two papers published in the journal Cell in January 2018 caused quite a stir by claiming that human consciousness itself stems from the insertion of bits of genetic material from viruses into animal genes.
This God-like potential for viruses to change the human genome was too much for the predatory billionaires to pass up. But what I’m curious about is whether Gates & the Biowarfare Junta are trying to solve the Christian paradox by physically changing people’s DNA? It’s the ultimate God Project.
Think about it:
Gates already lacks ethics and the knowledge of right and wrong. And he is hoping to become immortal through transhumanism — the merger of human consciousness with computers.
But when he looks out on the vast sea of humanity, I wonder if he’s trying to solve the Christian paradox through brute force — physically rewiring people at the genetic level so that they no longer have these three characteristics that make us human?
In an earlier era, philosophers and revolutionaries tried to solve the flaws in human nature via various -isms (stoicism, idealism, liberalism, romanticism, communism, conservatism, progressivism, etc.). Religion has tried to address these flaws through spiritual practice. But is Gates trying to solve this paradox on the molecular level by regressing humanity back into a more primitive animal state?
We already see that many of the Covid-vaccinated are struggling cognitively — they appear to have lost access to logic and reason. Thus far we have blamed this on fear or ideology. But what if it’s more than that? If Gates & the Biowarfare Junta could identify the regions of the human genome that code for consciousness and ethics, would they wipe them out? I think that’s the utopia they seek — turning messy flawed humans into something much more neat, predictable, and controllable — machines, software, or sheep.
Blessings to the warriors. 🙌
Prayers for everyone fighting to stop the iatrogenocide. 🙏
Huzzah for those who are building the parallel society our hearts know is possible. ✊
In the comments, please let me know what’s on your mind.
As always, I welcome any corrections.
Horizontal Gene Transfer Transduction (HGTT) is the evolutionary biology name for evolution via viruses. Biologists have been aware of HGTT since the late 1950s. It turns out that viruses are originally produced by cells and then cast out into the world to share a genetic sequence that is adaptively helpful with other cells throughout all kingdoms of life including all single-celled and multi-celled organisms. When a virus docks into a cell's receptor cite, the cell open the virus unloads the contents of the virus and uses that DNA or RND as well as useful enzymes that are used to insert the genetic material into the cells genome. In addition to updating the cells genome, the cell makes copies of the virus and sends them out into the world to help other cells evolve. Beginning in the 1980s genetic engineering began to hijack this natural process by isolating viruses using ultracentrifugation and then packing into those viruses the genetic RNA or DNA that the engineer wanted to inserted into a target organism's genome. Finally the altered viruses are injected into the target organism. Then, nature completes the process via the natural HGTT process. The successful genetic changes that genetic engineers have achieved by hijacking natural HGTT proves that natural HGTT does change cellular DNA. Going even further, the human version of genetic engineering is called Gene Therapy and it has been used to cure the genetic abnormalities that cause sickle cell anemia, hemophilia and a few forms of hereditary cancer.
The article found here: https://pediaa.com/why-are-viruses-used-in-gene-therapy/ contains the following: Why are Viruses Used in Gene Therapy: Due to the infectious lifecycle, viruses are widely-used in gene transfer during gene therapy. Generally, viruses infect host cells and replicate inside the host cell by integrating viral DNA into the genome of the host. Hence, the interested DNA fragments can be introduced into the cell by packing it inside the viral particles. The three main types of viral vectors used in gene therapy are retroviruses, adenoviruses, and adeno-associated viruses (AAV). In addition, herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1), baculovirus, vaccine virus are also used as vectors. The use of adenoviruses in gene therapy is shown in figure 1.
So, at this point we know that evolution does take place while we are alive via HGTT. Additionally, in some cases, those genetic changes can get into our sperm or eggs and become part of our children's genome making the genetic update part of the collective human genome. Of course that also happens with all sorts of creatures. On the other hand, neo-Darwinian evolution is being found to be incredibly unlikely to result in healthy adaptations. Therefore, it looks like viruses are involved in the primary mode of adaptive evolution.
Still, there's a very difficult to explain step in natural HGTT. How does the cell that produces the original virus determine what DNA or RNA ought to be placed into the virus? We know this isn't a random process because of the studies done with bacteria that become immune to antibiotics. What was discovered is that bacteria that is exposed to poisonous antibiotics produce viruses and share them until all the bacteria are genetically evolved by the HGTT process. That occurs quite rapidly and results is antibiotic resistant bacteria. To make sure that the viruses actually conveyed the evolutionary genetic update to achieve antibiotic resistance, the researchers used ultracentrifugation to isolate the viruses suspected of spreading the genetic update. Then those viruses where introduced to a culture of the same type of bacteria without exposing that bacteria to the antibiotic. After introducing the viruses and allowing time for the HGTT process to update the bacteria genome, that bacteria also became resistant to the antibiotic. Therefore, we know the HGTT process evolved the bacteria. However, how was the genetic sequence that was placed in those viruses devised? Did the little cell figure out what DNA or RNA was needed to develop antibiotic resistance? That seems impossible. Certainly a brilliant consciousness with extensive biological and chemical knowledge must have been involved in figuring out how to evolve the bacterial DNA in order to develop resistance to the antibiotic.
This, brings up the God theory. I like the panentheism version which is the belief or doctrine that God is greater than the universe and includes and interpenetrates it. Even at the cellular level, God is present and involved in life on all levels. Based on many thing including transcendental experiences that I've had, God is most likely pure consciousness which existed prior to the formation of the present universe. That consciousness formed and is everything and everyone.
Max Planck was a proponent for consciousness creating matter. With a Nobel Prize for discovering energy quanta, he became the distinguished father of quantum theory. In 1931, The Observer, a famous British weekly, reported Planck’s viewpoint: "I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness."
Later in his 1944 speech “The Nature of Matter,” Planck further explained how consciousness is present throughout everything: "There is no matter as such. All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. This mind is the matrix of all matter."
Sadly, most physicists focus on physical matter as the universe's foundation and reject Planck’s views on consciousness being fundamental. This is where we get to Toby's discussion and concerns about human consciousness. However, rather than presuming consciousness is a result of evolution, what has been gaining traction in evolutionary biology and astro-physics is that consciousness came first and that God consciousness formed the universe, life and guided the development of life via HGTT and symbiogenesis (the fusion of two symbiotic organisms into one new organism that reproduces).
Many people, including myself, have experienced transcendental experiences in which we either return to a state of oneness, or we exit the physical body to explore the astral realm that is commonly referred to as the Heavens (which include hell). In near death experiences, human consciousness leaves the physical body and operates in a heightened way observing the dead body and people working to revive the body.
A notable example is cardiologist Pim van Lommel. He designed and performed an extensive research project to investigate near-death experiences that take place on the operating table. Under the controlled environment of a cluster of hospitals with medically trained staff, van Lommel systematically studied near-death experiences in a wide variety of patients who survived cardiac arrest. After twenty years of research, van Lommel published his results in The Lancet.
Then, to more widely share what he discovered, van Lommel published "Consciousness Beyond Life: The Science of the Near-Death Experience" in 2007. That book provides evidence that the near-death phenomenon is an authentic experience that cannot be attributed to imagination, psychosis, or oxygen deprivation. Based on his extensive research, van Lommel shows that our consciousness does not always coincide with brain functions. Moreover, consciousness can even be experienced separately from the human body. This research proves the popular machine-brain theory false, making it a myth. Despite that, most scientists and most of the general public believe the machine-brain myth, even though it has been proven false. There are other studies that also prove the machine-brain myth false.
Despite all of that, when human consciousness in located in a human brain it becomes effected by the brain chemistry and other physical issues. When engaged in the head-brain environment the conscious mind affects the brain-body complex and vice versa. This entanglement of the physical body and the spirit being results in a complicated interrelationship that's not understood by science at this time. I doubt that humanity will ever be able to understand the complex interrelationship that takes place between consciousness and matter. So even though Bill Gates and other globalist trans-humanists dream of controlling consciousness using physical devises, it's very unlikely that they will succeed. First of all because they don't view reality from a primacy of consciousness perspective. Secondly, even if they accepted the consciousness comes first perspective that will simply lead to further complexity and evermore confusion.
Sorry for the length of this comment. I'm posting it without rereading it so I'm also sorry for any typos.
You are spot on when you state that Christians don’t believe we just landed here. But we absolutely do not believe we evolved from primordial ooze. We are the result of Intelligent Design, created in the image of God to be in relationship with Him.
Other than that, I take zero issue with your evaluation of the mess we currently find ourselves in with billionaire psychopaths trying to impose their wills on us.