A dystopian Peter Pan
Democrats aspire to create a society made up entirely of obedient children ruled over by the abusive Pharma state
One of the strangest facets of the iatrogenocide is that many Democrats can no longer tell the difference between adults and children. It brings me no joy to note this. But it’s everywhere and I have not seen others report on this so I will.
1. Democrats at all levels of government — from President Biden on down to county supervisors and city council members — believe that children should be able to make the decision to take puberty blockers (such as the chemical castration drug, Lupron) and undergo sex change surgery that will leave them permanently infertile.
Nearly all mainstream medical associations (e.g. the American Medical Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, and the Endocrine Society) and public health agencies are staffed by Democrats and they are all on board with this.
Democrats are making several extraordinary intellectual mistakes in this case:
• Thinking that children have the intellectual capacity to make an informed decision about complex medical issues with lifelong implications;
• Not even bothering to study the possible long-term harms from this approach;
• Seeing adulthood as a disease to be prevented; and
• Not realizing that in many cases Pharma and surgeons are enriching themselves by taking advantage of children on the autism spectrum.
In a sane world, any one of these points would end this scheme. And yet Democrats all fell in line in the space of 15 years.
2. Nearly every blue state pushes minor consent bills to allow children to be vaccinated at school without their parents’ knowledge or permission. It’s nearly impossible to overstate how evil these bills are.
• Children are not old enough to properly weigh risks and benefits from vaccines.
• Children will not know their full medical history and any possible contraindications going back to infancy.
• What happens if the child is injured by a vaccine and the parents don’t even know that a vaccine was administered? How will the parents apply for injury compensation during the brief window of eligibility without knowing what was done to their child?
• Minor consent bills are a violation of federal law that requires vaccine information statements to be provided to the parent or legal guardian for any vaccines on the childhood schedule.
I also want to underscore the brazen hypocrisy of minor consent bills. Democratic lawmakers claim that children are mentally capable of making a decision about vaccination. Yet, these bills do NOT allow a child to REFUSE a vaccine that their parents have consented to. So are children capable of making this decision or not? It seems that Democrats consider children to be capable decision-makers insofar as they are submissive and obedient to the drug cartel and all risk of harm is borne by the child, in secret.
A federal court struck down Washington D.C.’s minor consent bill (thanks to the brilliant work of Aaron Siri and his team) thus setting a precedent that these bills violate federal law. And yet Democrats, including those in the California legislature, just keep bringing up these minor consent bills every year.
3. Endocrine disruption caused by giving shots to pregnant women, the HPV vaccine, and Covid shots mean that some children will never hit puberty. Democrats seem fine with this, even though fertility already fell below replacement prior to Covid and now fertility will decline even further.
4. Two of the most important issues for Democrats are climate change and vaccines. And on both of those issues they used teenage actors, with no relevant education or experience, to carry their message (Greta Thunberg in the case of climate change and Ethan Lindenberger in connection with vaccines). Rather than engage on the substance of these issues, Democrats crafted these campaigns as messianic children’s crusades. The message that Democrats are sending is that children somehow know better than adults by virtue of being children — which is an odd stance to take on complex scientific policy matters.
5. The intellectual guiding light of progressivism at the moment, Michel Foucault (1926–1984), also had trouble understanding the difference between adults and children and likely was a pedophile. Foucault’s genius is celebrated by left social scientists while his sexual abuse of boys in Tunisia is overlooked. Why? Could Foucault’s interest in pederasty have shaped his philosophy that sought to erase heretofore existing categories in society?
I find all of this extremely strange. The heroes of the progressive movement — John Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Betty Friedan, Rachel Carson, and Joan Baez were grown ups, statesmen and stateswomen, who took seriously their role in society. In the 1960s, Democrats aspired to stop toxic pollution and achieve equality for women and for people of color.
Now the Democratic Party wants society to remain in a condition of permanent childhood with the Pharma state as the (abusive) parent. Democrats’ most cherished policy goal seems to be a dystopian version of Peter Pan.
What is it about adulthood that Democrats fear?
I think the answers might be surprisingly straightforward.
Pharma fears adults because only adults can hold them accountable. No adults, no Nuremberg 2.0. So Pharma wants as few adults in society as possible. Totalitarian regimes always attempt to disrupt families because they are an independent source of power outside the control of the state. Also, Pharma makes a fortune from poisoning kids with vaccines, treating vaccine injuries, poisoning kids (many of whom are on the spectrum) with puberty blockers, surgically mutilating kids, and just generally destroying people’s health. The Fourth Industrial Revolution is a police state where people are required to remain obedient children forever.
And the bougiecrats? Well, they never really stood a chance. Their parents vaccinated the hell out of them because they thought they were doing the right thing. Many of them have been on hormonal birth control and SSRI antidepressants (including Prozac, which is a fluoride compound) since they were young. And now with regular Covid shots, the injuries accelerate. I think that fearing adulthood is a symptom of widespread neurological injury in this population. So the official platform of the Democratic Party, preventing children from ever becoming adults via endless vaccines, pills, injections, and surgeries becomes a sort of Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy — dressed up as enlightened public policy and allopathic “standard of care”.
I will have more to say about what we do about this in a subsequent post. At a minimum, people who do not understand the difference between children and adults should not be in positions of authority. Also, we are going to need a national voluntary detox effort to help people recover from the harms inflicted upon them by the psychotic Pharma state.
It is a sign of the times that anyone who thinks that there is a difference between children and adults is somehow now labeled a conservative.
Blessings to the warriors. 🙌
Prayers for the vaccine-injured and everyone fighting to stop the iatrogenocide. 🙏
Huzzah for everyone working to build the better world our hearts know is possible. ✊
In the comments, I’m eager to hear your thoughts. Is my analysis correct or am I being too hard on the bougiecrats or otherwise misunderstanding or missing something about the current conjuncture?
As always, I welcome any corrections.
Wanting to chop bits of your body off because you think it isn't 'you' is called body dysmorphic disorder, and it's a serious mental health problem. Like anorexia nervosa. Mental health issues associated with serious physical problems - that can kill you.
And no, a kid is NOT an adult and shouldn't be having the final say in their health decisions. When they hit 16-ish, OK, that's getting into a grey area, and when they're 18, fine, they can make their own calls - right or wrong.
But you know you're not in the land of the living when governments and health professionals say "It's OK, you really want to be a boy/girl/it, don't you (because we've been brandishing weird sexual stuff at you since you could crawl), so here's what we're going to do. We'll chop off all that strange sexual stuff you were born with, create synthetic boy/girl/it sexual stuff, and sure, you'll never be able to breed, and you'll have to take hormones for life, and lots of people will think you're weird, and you'll lose friends, family, you name it, but hey, that's OK. Because this is YOU, isn't it? And seriously, don't worry about people telling you it's all in your head. We believe you. Trust us. We're doctors!"
This whole concept of 'gender' is NUTS. You're born BOY or GIRL and your genetics show that. OK, some weird souls out there get XXY or something, but they are SO rare. But thinking you're born into the wrong body is NUTS. It's not normal, and people shouldn't be encouraging this talk. I'm quite sure there genuinely ARE people out there who have felt this their whole lives, and I truly feel sorry for them. But the great majority these days going in for the new 'fashion' of transgender surgery are just wannabes. Left alone, with no children's drag queen shows, or 'gender' talk, they'd probably just turn out straight, or gay, which was already pre-determined in their DNA anyway.
When I was a teenager, I remember the MSM thought it was horrific that all these Somali girls were being forcibly circumcised with a sharp rock in cold water and then the whole vulva was sewn up, which caused them immense physical pain every time they peed or had their period. Then when they were married off, their husband had to literally cut them open on their wedding night. What a horror show. And now, what, because a 'doctor' is chopping things up down there, it's somehow OK?!?!
The world is CRAZY and anyone who wants this gender surgery done to them is also CRAZY. And they should be getting mental health help, not having their twisted fantasies brought to life! In most cases, though, it's the doctor's and government's twisted fantasies, and the youth of today are the victims.
People make me sick, they really do.
I’ve thought for awhile that it’s a cultural problem we are facing. It’s the product of diminishing motherhood. Women are told they can have it all. We are raised being asked what we want to be in the corporate world. We are expected to go to college and find our dream job. Break glass ceilings. So we go to college, get the job, and then realize that at some point the job interferes with having a family. But, now we are told that we can have it all! So we have children and most women go through a lot of anguish going back to work after the allotted maternity leave is over. It isn’t natural for us to leave our kids in a daycare all day long and see them only for a short time in the evening. This is the beginning of handing your kids over to authority. You are too tired to make decisions and trust the experts to make decisions for your kids. It’s a slow fade. But this is having it all. What a lie. And then we are faced with not only financial decisions, but huge life decisions to fix all those years of lies. Our culture must change. Liberal women who don’t have kids cannot understand or relate to any of it. I know this is an unpopular statement, but unless you have experienced motherhood you simply cannot understand the relationship between a mother and child. My pre-motherhood self would have completely disagreed with all of the above. Motherhood changes a person in ways they cannot understand until they experience it.