Why the fake CDC investigation into vaccine-induced strokes in people 65+ is a limited hangout...
and what that tells us about the actual data
The CDC, FDA, and the White House have a massive problem. The Covid shots don’t work and they are killing and maiming people at an astronomical rate. So yesterday — a Friday afternoon before a long holiday weekend — the CDC launched a limited hangout.
CJ Hopkins gives us an excellent definition of a “limited hangout”:
The way a limited hangout works is, if you’re an intelligence agency, or a global corporation, or a government, or a non-governmental organization, and you have been doing things you need to hide from the public, and those things are starting to come to light such that you can’t just deny that you are doing them anymore, what you do is, you release a limited part of the story to distract people’s attention from the rest of the story. The part you release is the “limited hangout.” It’s not a lie. It’s just not the whole story. You “hang it out” so that it will become the whole story, and thus stop people from pursuing the whole story.
In its Friday press release, the CDC confessed that the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) showed that people 65+ who received the bivalent Pfizer shot [that was only tested in 8 mice] were more likely to have an “ischemic stroke in the 21 days following vaccination compared with days 22-44 following vaccination.”
But the CDC assured us that they looked into and found nothing to worry about so “no change in vaccination practice is recommended.” All of the major news agencies reported on this. Also, lots of people in the movement took the bait that this was somehow a hopeful sign of the long-awaited pivot on policy away from the deadly Covid shots.
C’mon man, this is not our first rodeo.
Here’s how we know this is a limited hangout:
• The CDC only looked at one side effect when in fact there are hundreds of side effects that are generating a statistically significant safety signal.
• The CDC is only looking at people 65 years and older when in fact the safety signal appears across all age groups, especially the young.
• The CDC is only looking at VSD when in fact all post-marketing surveillance systems (VAERS, V-Safe, VSD) are showing problems. [The FDA also has a post-marketing surveillance system called Sentinel BEST and no one outside the FDA has seen that data yet.]
• There is no control group. The CDC is comparing strokes 0-21 days after injection vs. 22-42 days after injection. Surely they already know that strokes are high in both time periods — because once the genetically modified mRNA hijacks your cells to produce toxic spike proteins, that process can continue for months (or possibly longer). The only proper comparison group is the unvaccinated population but the CDC will never run that analysis because of what it would reveal.
• Supposedly the CDC will present more information at the January 26, VRBPAC meeting. But if history is any guide, the data will be presented by John Su, Tom Shimabukuro, Matthew Oster, or Nicola Klein. These people are criminals whose whole job is to manipulate the vaccine data in order to protect the cartel. So whatever info will be presented at that meeting will just continue the cover up.
The CDC announcing the limited hangout when they did, in the way they did, actually tells us a lot about the real data. As the brilliant Liz Willner pointed out on Twitter:
The VSD NEVER finds signals. It’s not a database, it’s a connection to a loose group of HMO databases. It’s highly subject to bias. If they are admitting to a VSD signal, the problem is likely enormous. They couldn’t make it disappear. (For reference, the VSD found no myocarditis signal.)
So the limited hangout tells us that the CDC is seeing red lights flashing everywhere. And their way of dealing with it is to pretend that they discovered a small signal in the VSD that “really was a false alarm.” Their goal is to get the gullible public to say, “whew, those CDC people are really on it!” even while nearly a third of everyone in the U.S. personally knows someone who has been killed by the clot shot.
To any Republican elected officials in Congress who may be reading this, we need you to step up NOW. Hearings are fine, but they are not enough. Symbolic bills are okay, but often a waste of time. As you know, with a divided Congress, there are basically only going to be two bills that will pass in the coming year — the debt ceiling agreement (happening in the next few weeks) and the FY 2024 omnibus spending bill (at the end of the year). So those are the only leverage points you will have and we need you to use them to stop the iatrogenocide. All negotiations with the Senate and the White House in connection with these two bills must include the following three non-negotiable demands:
1. All Covid-19 shots must be withdrawn from the market immediately and permanently. (Existing medicines, not vaccines, are safe and effective at preventing and treating Covid.)
2. Congress must repeal the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and the PREP Act so that vaccine manufacturers can once again be sued for harms.
3. The U.S. must permanently withdraw from the World Health Organization and the CDC must be stripped of any oversight role in connection with vaccines.
This is only a big reach if you don’t realize the full extent of the iatrogenocide. When you realize that the public health establishment, with the backing of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the pharmaceutical industry, launched a pre-emptive war against humanity, the three items listed above become the bare minimum that any civilized society will do in response. The Biden Administration desperately wants to avoid defaulting on the ($31 trillion) national debt and pass a budget bill heading into a presidential election year, so you may as well demand the legislative steps that will actually stop the iatrogenocide, in return for a deal.
Lots of people (Gates, Fauci, Walensky, Califf, Jha, Murthy, Bourla, Bancel, Birx, Collins…) need to be prosecuted for crimes against humanity too, but you already know that.
Blessings to the warriors. 🙌
Prayers for everyone fighting to stop the iatrogenocide. 🙏
Huzzah for everyone working to build the alternative society our hearts know is possible. ✊
In the comments, please let me know what’s on your mind.
As always, I welcome any corrections.
The concept of "limited hangout" makes perfect sense and has occurred many times historically. The Clinton machine had this down pat. Deny, deny, deny until no longer possible to do so, then allow for a sliver of truth....or if confronted under penalty of perjury in a legal setting, the inability to recall serves criminals quite nicely. If we ever see an attempt to hold pfizer higher ups legally accountable for the mass murder they have wrought upon the world, a sudden wave of amnesia seems predictable.
CJ Hopkins' definition of a "limited hangout" is very useful, however, at times I think he goes overboard with it, as for example his criticizing the release of the Twitter files as a "limited hangout." From my perspective, whatever one thinks about Elon Musk, he has still done society a huge favour by releasing this information. For one thing, there is no longer any plausible deniability that the CIA, NSA and FBI were all in on the suppression of free speech and the enforcing of the official Covid narrative. That now sets the historical record straight just as Woodward and Bernstein did for Watergate. I'm not an unqualified fan of Musk by any means, but credit where credit is due! I wrote about it here: https://seanarthurjoyce.substack.com/p/mass-formation-works-in-all-directions