Thinking Points, March 21, 2024

Lockdowns, epistemology in the age of the iatrogenocide, reality, Nord Stream, rational policy over panic, deep state coup d’état, Kate Middleton, conquest, Murthy v. Missouri, snacking with friends

Here are my latest thinking points:

---

Lockdowns

How about we lockdown the politicians and the bureaucrats and then go on about our business.

---

A question for the normies:

If something very bad happened at the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), how would you know? This is not a partisan question, this is an epistemological question that all people of good faith should wrestle with.

For example, just imagine that malevolent corporate interests who want to profit from poisoning kids captured the AAP. Who would tell you?

The AAP wouldn’t tell you because they are captured.

Pediatricians wouldn’t tell you because they are complicit.

The TV news wouldn’t tell you because they don’t want to lose their major advertisers.

The government wouldn’t tell you because they are also captured.

Academics wouldn’t tell you because they don’t want to be the next victims.

So seriously, how would you know?

Courageous parents caring for their injured children would tell you as would a handful of brave pediatricians who would soon lose their licenses for telling the truth.

That’s how you’d know.

And that’s exactly what’s happening.

---

Vaccines are a ruling class political strategy

What if vaccines interfere with the ability to perceive reality itself? That’s what we’re seeing right now isn’t it — many of the vaccinated seem to be losing touch with reality. What if that’s by design? It’s difficult to overthrow the ruling class if one can't perceive reality.

---

What’s the carbon footprint of blowing up the Nord Stream pipeline?

The blowing up of the Nord Stream pipeline is so profoundly weird.

Russia said: ‘We have lots of clean-burning natural gas that we would like to sell to Europe.’

Germany said: ‘We would like to buy your natural gas.’

Russia built the pipeline to Germany.

The U.S. said: ‘No you cannot do that.’ Then the U.S. blew up the pipeline and told Germany to buy our liquified natural gas sent by tankers across the Atlantic Ocean.

How did that not cause a major political crisis in Germany?

And how did that not cause a major political crisis in the U.S.?

It’s one of the largest environmental crimes in history.

---

This is how you do it

Jeffrey Tucker (President of the Brownstone Institute) did an extraordinary thing.

The proposed WHO Pandemic Treaty is based on the claim that “zoonotic spillover” (viruses making the leap from animals to humans) is a major threat to human health. The G-20 (the representatives from the 20 largest economies in the world) endorsed this notion at a summit in Bali in 2022. But the claim itself is far-fetched.

Jeffrey Tucker funded a team of mainstream academics to examine the claims made by the WHO about the risks of zoonotic spillover. They read all of the sources cited by the WHO and read the rest of the scientific literature on the topic. These academics then produced a report titled, “Rational Policy over Panic.”

As you probably already figured out, the WHO is greatly exaggerating the risks in order to enrich the biowarfare industrial complex.

Now Mark Ridley from the Wall Street Journal has picked up the story.

It does not go well for Team Spillover:

A new report from the University of Leeds, prepared in part by former World Health Organization executives, finds that the claims made by the G-20 in support of this agenda either are unsupported by evidence, contradict their own cited sources, or fail to correct for improved detection of pathogens. Over the past decade the burden and risk of spillover has been relatively small and probably decreasing. The Leeds authors conclude: “The implication is that the largest investment in international public health in history is based on misinterpretations of key evidence as well as a failure to thoroughly analyze existing data.”

This is what academia should be! Do the work — examine the evidence, practice skepticism in all things, and report in good faith on what we know and don’t know about the topic. But academia is completely captured as are the postwar international institutions. So the only way to do proper scientific work these days is to create alternative funding streams outside of the traditional academic system. Deep respect to Jeffrey Tucker for stepping up to support the research that needed to be done.

You can read a summary of the study on the Brownstone Institute website. And you can support the life-giving work of the Brownstone Institute (here).

---

My thoughts on the four-year anniversary of the deep state coup d’état

I will not let you trespass my body with your ridiculous junk science.

I will not participate in official lies in order to fit in to polite society.

I will not ignore the suffering of the vaccine injured.

I will not turn off my brain so that Pharma can avoid accountability.

I will not make burnt offerings to your golden calf.

---

Kate Middleton is the new Tiffany Dover

My theory is that Kate Middleton is vaccine injured. But one cannot speak about vaccine injury without getting banned from polite society. So the British royal family does dumb sh*te like hiding her for months and then badly photoshopping a picture to make it look like everything is okay. Nothing is okay. Vaccines are wrecking humanity.

---

It’s so obvious when you see it

The European conquest of the New World was made infinitely easier by the fact that disease killed 90% of the indigenous population.

So as Gates et al. try to conquer and enslave the developed world of course they’re attempting to use disease to reduce the local population.

It’s 1492 again.

---

It’s very, very, very, strange

Four years later, I’m still stunned by how quickly most Americans surrendered to fascism:

News media: “There’s a new Wuhan flu.”

Most Americans: “Welp, I guess the only choice is to burn the Constitution, turn against our neighbors, destroy the economy, and inject ourselves with toxic gene therapies!”

Yes, it was planned years in advance. Yes, they spent billions of dollars on propaganda. Yes, people were afraid. But that still does not explain how profoundly strange it was for an entire society to repudiate all of its values in an instant.

---

Murthy v. Missouri

Question: Does the federal government ever get it wrong when it comes to urgent matters of national security or public health?

Answer: Yes, all the time.

Question: How do we know this?

Answer: The public eventually unearths the truth because of the free exchange of information and opinions guaranteed by the First Amendment.

Question: What is the Biden administration arguing in Murthy v. Missouri?

Answer: That the federal government is infallible when it comes to national security and public health and thus should be exempt from the constraints of the First Amendment.

Question: Isn’t that factually absurd, blatantly unconstitutional, and guaranteed to cause tyranny?

Answer: Yes.

Question: So, um, we’re going to have to overthrow all of it then?

Answer: Yes, the entire system.

---

Your moment of Zen

“Oh hey, whatcha eating?”

---

Blessings to the warriors. 🙌

Prayers for everyone fighting to stop the iatrogenocide. 🙏

Huzzah for those who are building the parallel society our hearts know is possible. ✊

In the comments, please let me know what’s on your mind.

As always, I welcome any corrections.

---