Posts that were banned on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook
Fragile Fascist Clowns cannot permit any dissent from the official narrative lest it hasten the demise of their beloved toxic product
Here are the posts that have gotten me banned or suspended on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook over the last year. Totalitarian regimes are brittle and they cannot handle any critique or independent thinking.
Twitter
I received a lifetime ban from Twitter for a single retweet about how Tony Fauci blocked access to the antibiotic Bactrim during the AIDS epidemic:
No one disputes that Fauci blocked access to Bactrim and this decision killed 30,534 gay men. You can read a brief history of this debacle (here). Fauci’s daughter Alison works at Twitter so no criticism of this mass-murdering gnome is allowed.
Instagram
Instagram reminded me today that they have deleted 6 of my posts!
What was especially galling about this one ^^ was that former CDC Director Robert Redfield literally confirmed the facts in this post and I linked to the article in my comments connected to the photo. So the IG Stasi are claiming that the CDC Director is violating their guidelines, not me (I’m just the messenger).
The censorship came fast and furious in August 2021, as Pfizer was trying to get “full approval” for their junk science mRNA shot. This was an incredibly impactful Call to Action (literally two career FDA staffers stepped down after this) so the goons at Pfizer must have put in a call to the IG Stasi to have the post taken down.
Pfizer also put in a call to Vice.com who put out a hit piece on the founder of OpenVAERS for having the audacity to make federal data easily searchable.
The Instagram Stasi claim clairvoyance about the political economy of the future which enables them to censor any speculation about the likely impacts of current regulatory decisions.
This one was the worst. How does one even begin to explain to Nazis that censoring a post about them acting like Nazis proves that they are Nazis?
I didn’t even use the v word in this one:
After Instagram started censoring screenshots from OpenVAERS (see above), I created series of daily images where I used NY Times data to compare total deaths from coronavirus exactly 1 year apart. It drove Pharma absolutely crazy because it shows that deaths from coronavirus are HIGHER today, after nearly 400,000,000 shots have been injected, than a year ago when these shots did not exist at all. Reuters (whose CEO serves on the Board of Pfizer) put out a hit piece on me for this one:
I’m not clear on why Reuters thinks that the NY Times is lying when they post data from state and local health departments? Alas, Reuters’ breathless “fact-check” article could not explain why 400,000,000 doses of this product had led to more fatalities from the virus than no doses at all.
Facebook
Facebook has lost the plot recently.
Totalitarian regimes are humorless (May 12, 2021):
June 30, 2021, the Stasi are sensitive about being called out for their misbehavior.
This one still cracks me up. Apparently no one is allowed to call Gavin Newsom “Baby Hitler.” 😂 (It even had a typo that rendered it nonsensical but it still got banned!) ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I got a 30 day suspension for pointing out that there are too many toxic chemicals in kids these days.
Then I got another 30 day suspension while I was already suspended for something I said the day before. I guess I served my sentences concurrently? They never actually explain what it is about the post that they object to:
Pharma did indeed proceed to carpet bomb us throughout the month of August. So. many. hit. pieces. They dislike it when we know their playbook.
This was pretty interesting… Facebook “fact checked” a link inside my article on a different site, even though the link in question was not contained in the post on Facebook itself. This happened 3 times in a row (the Stasi literally followed my link to Substack, read the article, and then went back to Facebook to start slapping digital labels on it). Say what you will about the Stasi destroying the Constitution and committing crimes against humanity, their attention to detail is extraordinary!
Then I got another 30 day suspension for asking for a reference for a claim I had seen online. I was actually skeptical of the claim (which is why I asked), but then when they banned me for it I realized that I was over the target.
And then just this week USA Today put out a hit piece on me for this post (I could not respond on FB because I’m still in jail).
If my car stopped working every six months and I had to go out and buy a new one each time, I’d say that it was a failed product.
Why exactly are Reuters and USA Today reading my social media posts? I mean, I’m flattered but it’s just so completely over the top. Here was my exchange with the “reporter” from USA Today (who just graduated from college this year):
My point in posting all of this is just to show how completely absurd it is. It takes a lot of time, effort, and money to set up a global system of surveillance, censorship, and control. It serves no public purpose. Totalitarianism exists to protect the egos of the drug lords and the profits of their murderous multinational firms.
I gotta say-- despite its lack of data, the winner among these is the "I don't speak psychopath" volcano post. If there's any argument for censorship, it's that these bans are like the rival who is making you better. Rooting for you from the cowards' section.
Your writing is a great education to me, as well as providing numerous laughs. Thank you :-)