Paraphrasing: circumcision is not simply a confounding factor. Further to your thesis observation on page 39, my sister was associated with a group of nurses who were attempting to organize a protest against male infant circumcision in Kingston General Hospital... Analysis of the MRI data indicated that the surgery subjected the infant to significant trauma. The greatest changes occurred in the limbic system concentrating in the amygdala and in the frontal and temporal lobes... In other words, the evidence generated by this research indicated that the brain of the circumcised infant was permanently changed by the surgery... All of the participants in the research including myself were called before the hospital discipline committee and were severely reprimanded. We were told that while male circumcision was legal under all circumstances in Canada, any attempt to study the adverse effects of circumcision was strictly prohibited by the ethical regulations.
For their whole life, wolves are not made into wild, highly intelligent, fearful psychopaths, because of the genetics related to starch, but are definitely made so by epigenetics controlling the way their genes work. Starch makes wolves blind when their teeth appear and are obedient to their pack by sensory shocks of those teeth, via neural crest cell migration into the craniofacial skeleton. This links indirectly, to neonatal foreskin trauma in humans passing psychopathy down through many generations of both sexes. Ironically, instead of producing leaders who are sociopaths, the reduced rates of circumcision, since the 70s, thus caused cultural shunning and high autism rates. Even such a rare connection to autism has been censored out of AI source data.
I put your Sydney Uni 2019 thesis onto My DJ Reader and will now get so far into it that I may make another reply, before the balance gets queued 8MB down the track for some time next year.
Hurrah for truth, thank you for standing your ground Toby and for the work you did on your thesis. It is about time the narrative crumbled, the lies died and further injuries are prevented.
I am convinced that viruses don't exist and contagion is a myth.
It is in that context that 'Safe and Effective' vaccines are a fraud perpetrated to profit from illness, death, and suffering, not only vaccines, but all of allopathic medicine.
But your beliefs re: Safe Vaccines are ... what? Tell us. And, back it up with facts. Do you *honestly* believe there will EVER be a 'Safe Vaccine'? Other than Kennedy/Trump/ all elected / Frontline unDoctors / Big Pharma and you? spouting nonsense about 'safe' vaccines, give us some proof <-- key word, of this. This should be easy, Toby. And, very important. Name the specific vaccines that are 98% safe. You can't. How about 10% safe? Name them.
And, was there ever a vaccine that actually worked? If so, name them. Be specific. The year and name of the vaccine that 'works'. I've asked this many times and I'm horrified by their responses. Mostly 'Doctors'.
Tha k you for sharing what many believed but bowed to the rich mongers. Kind of like the vp who just died and the profit he made off wars. Please keep bringing it
This is a massive paradigm shift and you're right to call it out. The fact that the NY Times is now admitting that genetic mutations only explain 30 percent of autism cases (and likely less) opens the floodgates for serious investigation into toxicants. Your point about de novo mutations is particularly important because those are spontanious mutations that occur in the child, not inherited from parents, which means environmental triggers are the obvious culprit. The pharmaceutical industry has been working overtime to suppress this conversation for decades. Companies like Merck, GSK, Sanofi, and Pfizer have billions of dollars invested in maintaining the genetic narrative because it deflects blame from their products. The fact that you published the definitive systematic review six years ago and got economicaly blacklisted instead of celebrated shows how broken the scientific establishment has become.
Thank you so much for this huge ray of light shining for us all. Bless you - I feel a huge relief and yet I also don’t feel as positive as you for an outcome any time soon. Fingers crossed 🤞🏼 though 🙏🏼💖
You may be interested in this smoking gun scientific study by University of Maryland School of Medicine - inflammation in early childhood causing autism.
"What they found was striking. In the children who had experienced inflammation, two types of brain cells in the cerebellum—called Golgi cells and Purkinje cells—had not developed in the usual way. These cells are very important."
So just connect the dots what event caused the inflammation?
I already knew only 30% of autism cases had a genetic cause, but only because I bothered to look it up.
Even that 30% may have been caused by some sort of environmental trigger
The truth of things can easily be found for those willing to look or ask obvious questions, there`s thousands of scientific papers online. Sadly, most don’t bother so apathy and hiding things in plain sight can be relied upon.
In the future AI search will probably have to be controlled centrally as they cant afford all this info in hidden corners being collated in an instant and the correct conclusion being generated to the human.
Intellectual apathy gets worse though even otherwise smart people, who are good at maths and statistics, can’t see the obvious mathematical truth of autism increase being the fraction of those with associated intellectual disability growing in proportion with increasing numbers.
If autism is such a mild condition nowadays why do 39% have an IQ below 70? And 64% below 85 (source -CDC figures 2025) ?
Why is it 39%, why not 1% if we are really drowning in future socially awkward programmers and app developers.
Paraphrasing: circumcision is not simply a confounding factor. Further to your thesis observation on page 39, my sister was associated with a group of nurses who were attempting to organize a protest against male infant circumcision in Kingston General Hospital... Analysis of the MRI data indicated that the surgery subjected the infant to significant trauma. The greatest changes occurred in the limbic system concentrating in the amygdala and in the frontal and temporal lobes... In other words, the evidence generated by this research indicated that the brain of the circumcised infant was permanently changed by the surgery... All of the participants in the research including myself were called before the hospital discipline committee and were severely reprimanded. We were told that while male circumcision was legal under all circumstances in Canada, any attempt to study the adverse effects of circumcision was strictly prohibited by the ethical regulations.
https://circumcision.org/circumcision-permanently-alters-the-brain/
For their whole life, wolves are not made into wild, highly intelligent, fearful psychopaths, because of the genetics related to starch, but are definitely made so by epigenetics controlling the way their genes work. Starch makes wolves blind when their teeth appear and are obedient to their pack by sensory shocks of those teeth, via neural crest cell migration into the craniofacial skeleton. This links indirectly, to neonatal foreskin trauma in humans passing psychopathy down through many generations of both sexes. Ironically, instead of producing leaders who are sociopaths, the reduced rates of circumcision, since the 70s, thus caused cultural shunning and high autism rates. Even such a rare connection to autism has been censored out of AI source data.
Should be "lack" of starch makes wolves blind when their teeth appear.
I put your Sydney Uni 2019 thesis onto My DJ Reader and will now get so far into it that I may make another reply, before the balance gets queued 8MB down the track for some time next year.
Hurrah for truth, thank you for standing your ground Toby and for the work you did on your thesis. It is about time the narrative crumbled, the lies died and further injuries are prevented.
I am convinced that viruses don't exist and contagion is a myth.
It is in that context that 'Safe and Effective' vaccines are a fraud perpetrated to profit from illness, death, and suffering, not only vaccines, but all of allopathic medicine.
Read Dr. Tom Cowan and Sally Fallon Morell
https://archive.org/details/contagion-myth-246p
Amen.
But your beliefs re: Safe Vaccines are ... what? Tell us. And, back it up with facts. Do you *honestly* believe there will EVER be a 'Safe Vaccine'? Other than Kennedy/Trump/ all elected / Frontline unDoctors / Big Pharma and you? spouting nonsense about 'safe' vaccines, give us some proof <-- key word, of this. This should be easy, Toby. And, very important. Name the specific vaccines that are 98% safe. You can't. How about 10% safe? Name them.
And, was there ever a vaccine that actually worked? If so, name them. Be specific. The year and name of the vaccine that 'works'. I've asked this many times and I'm horrified by their responses. Mostly 'Doctors'.
What sayeth you?
https://open.substack.com/pub/hpatrick1991/p/autism-is-still-genetic?r=6jr5z7&utm_medium=ios
Thank you for sharing this. Very important. And this is on the rise
Tha k you for sharing what many believed but bowed to the rich mongers. Kind of like the vp who just died and the profit he made off wars. Please keep bringing it
Thank you Toby!
This is a massive paradigm shift and you're right to call it out. The fact that the NY Times is now admitting that genetic mutations only explain 30 percent of autism cases (and likely less) opens the floodgates for serious investigation into toxicants. Your point about de novo mutations is particularly important because those are spontanious mutations that occur in the child, not inherited from parents, which means environmental triggers are the obvious culprit. The pharmaceutical industry has been working overtime to suppress this conversation for decades. Companies like Merck, GSK, Sanofi, and Pfizer have billions of dollars invested in maintaining the genetic narrative because it deflects blame from their products. The fact that you published the definitive systematic review six years ago and got economicaly blacklisted instead of celebrated shows how broken the scientific establishment has become.
Thank you so much for this huge ray of light shining for us all. Bless you - I feel a huge relief and yet I also don’t feel as positive as you for an outcome any time soon. Fingers crossed 🤞🏼 though 🙏🏼💖
Check out my page!
Heads in BASKETS are all I want for Christmas...
I think the New York Times knew exactly what it was doing. When it comes to mainstream media, nothing happens by accident.
You may be interested in this smoking gun scientific study by University of Maryland School of Medicine - inflammation in early childhood causing autism.
"What they found was striking. In the children who had experienced inflammation, two types of brain cells in the cerebellum—called Golgi cells and Purkinje cells—had not developed in the usual way. These cells are very important."
So just connect the dots what event caused the inflammation?
https://knowridge.com/2025/07/childhood-inflammation-may-cause-autism-adhd-3/#google_vignette
I already knew only 30% of autism cases had a genetic cause, but only because I bothered to look it up.
Even that 30% may have been caused by some sort of environmental trigger
The truth of things can easily be found for those willing to look or ask obvious questions, there`s thousands of scientific papers online. Sadly, most don’t bother so apathy and hiding things in plain sight can be relied upon.
In the future AI search will probably have to be controlled centrally as they cant afford all this info in hidden corners being collated in an instant and the correct conclusion being generated to the human.
Intellectual apathy gets worse though even otherwise smart people, who are good at maths and statistics, can’t see the obvious mathematical truth of autism increase being the fraction of those with associated intellectual disability growing in proportion with increasing numbers.
If autism is such a mild condition nowadays why do 39% have an IQ below 70? And 64% below 85 (source -CDC figures 2025) ?
Why is it 39%, why not 1% if we are really drowning in future socially awkward programmers and app developers.
Nobody even RFK addresses this simple fact